March 12, 2008
Please
Attend "How to Make Cuba More Free," Wednesday, March 12, 6.30PM-
8.30PM at Reason's DC HQ!
As one Castro brother grimly replaces another in Cuba, Reason invites you to contemplate one way to immediately make that island prison a little bit less hellish: Lift the ban on American citizens traveling and doing business there.
On Wednesday, March 12, from 6.30PM to 8.30PM, join Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), co-sponsor of legislation to repeal the travel and trade bans, for an evening of conversation about U.S. policy toward Cuba. "The reign of Fidel Castro marked a brutal and dictatorial chapter for the Cuban people," says Flake. "Let's hope that his resignation opens a new chapter. Whether that new chapter will be open, however, largely depends on a new approach to Cuba by the U.S. Government. The U.S. embargo gave Fidel a tremendous advantage in terms of lengthening his tenure. Let's not give his successor the same advantage by keeping the embargo in place."
Soft and hard beverages (including Cuba Libres) and light fare will be served.
For Reason coverage of Cuba, go here.
For Rep. Flake's statement on Fidel Castro's resignation—and the failure of U.S. policy—go here.
We look forward to seeing you on Wednesday, March 12, 6.30pm to 8.30pm at Reason's DC HQ, 1747 Connecticut Avenue NW (three blocks north of Dupont Circle, near S Street; look for the "Free Minds and Free Markets" spotlight).
This event is free but RSVPs are required to attend. Please send them to events@reason.com or 310.391.2245.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I totally reject your garbage that Cuba is:
1) An island prison
2) A hell
3) Not free
Those are things that George W. Bush and the promoters of "lets
repeat a lie thousands of times until enough dumb sheep believe it
as truth" constantly parrot.
It is in the United States Guantanamo base "free and democratic
paradise" where people are routinely tortured in the name of the
war on terror.
It is in the United States were we are instituting a hell where our
constitution is systematically violated by a decider in chief who
effectively tells us: I am above the law! I can violate our
constitution with impunity, and ignore and not enforce new laws
passed by Congress, by merely issuing a divinely inspired signing
statement.
The only freedom that we enjoy today is the freedom given to
corporate elites to impose a fascist system on unsuspecting
Americans who clamor: Give me 'American Idol or give me
death.'
Of course you do not like the freedom that Cubans achieved on
January 1st, 1959. American imperialists and the American mafia
were kicked out of the island.
Mr. Gonzalez, you have to be one of the denser posters I've seen
around here.
On your site, you advocate for lifting the embargo.
reason is a fairly prominent advocate for this
policy, but you decide to fling about sophomoric socialistic
platitudes and name-calling instead of realizing tat you're
attacking an ally.
Secondly, do you see any deeper irony than claiming that America is
less free than Cuba while simultaneously using a Blogspot Account
(Google, CA) and living in Florida? Do you think you'd get away
with your crappy, childish rhetoric in Cuba under the bloody fist
of the Castros?
Of course you do not like the freedom that Cubans achieved on
January 1st, 1959.
Yeah, it's so free there that you've chosen to live in
Florida. I doubt you'll be rowing back any time soon. Tell
you what: put your freedom where your mouth is and apply for
political asylum in Cuba from America the Prison State...that ought
to be good for a laugh.
Say there, "Cuba Journal"... When's the last time someone died
at sea trying to flee the USA for Cuba a tiny boat?
-jcr
BTW, I remember a story I heard from a friend of my father's
about visiting the Soviet Union, doing the standard "intourist"
guided tour back in the Brezhnev era. On the last day before the
tour group was scheduled to leave, they got everybody together in a
room for their KGB tour guide to give them a harangue about the
terrible privations of capitalism. This guy stood up and said
"nobody shoots you for trying to leave."
The apparatchik didn't have an answer for that.
-jcr
Maybe Reason could do us all a favor and go on one of their tours. The only downside is I don't know if they make pleather jackets in the right color.
Cuba Journal
Outstanding angry rant. Too bad that
internet sites with music = fail
I'd be all for Bay of Pigs II (only this time without JFK
chickening out), but it's probably not necessary. If the rumors of
Raul following the China model, the Cuban regime's days are
numbered.
Milton Friedman's argument that economic freedom will inevitably
lead to political freedom has worked pretty well the last
half-century.
As soon as most Cubans have cell phones, they're one flash mob away
from freedom.
I'd be all for Bay of Pigs II
Of course you would.
You wouldn't be the one having to kill others for your
"vision".
There's no shortage of hypocrisy when a so-called "conservative"
advocates top-down, big government solutions for National
Glory®.
Cuba Journal | March 9, 2008, 10:53pm | #
I totally reject your garbage that Cuba is:
1) An island prison
2) A hell
3) Not free
Good heavens! A COMMUNIST TRUE BELIEVER!
Haven't seen one of those up close since the Cultural
Revolution.
I'd thought Michael Moore was the last of the species.
Aresen - too many people attend his movies for the entire audience to be looking for ironic entertainment.
Alright, why are the google ads at H&R for sites regarding reporting clergy sex abuse?
You wouldn't be the one having to kill others for your
"vision".
And you don't have to live under Castro. That said, if they're
taking private militias I'd be there, though again it's probably
unnecessary.
There's no shortage of hypocrisy when a so-called
"conservative" advocates top-down, big government solutions for
National Glory®.
Well, I'm more of a libertarian than a conservative. Frankly, I
don't care who liberates Cuba, or about "national glory." It's the
11 million Cubans living under Communist dictatorship that concern
me.
Frankly, I don't care who liberates Cuba, or about "national
glory."
Except you said you wouldn't mind a "Bay of Pigs II", which would
necessitate involvement from our Government.
I totally reject your garbage that Cuba is:
1) An island prison
2) A hell
3) Not free
Yet I noticed you remain domiciled in Fla.
Tall Dave, I forgot about JFK leaving all those Cubans sitting on
the beach with nothing but their............(think: if Fat Clemenza
hadn't taped the gun for Michael behind the toilet tank).
BTW, I remember a story I heard from a friend of my father's about visiting the Soviet Union, doing the standard "intourist" guided tour back in the Brezhnev era. On the last day before the tour group was scheduled to leave, they got everybody together in a room for their KGB tour guide to give them a harangue about the terrible privations of capitalism. This guy stood up and said "nobody shoots you for trying to leave."
The apparatchik didn't have an answer for that.
On the same subject, I remember a story told by Natan Sharansky in
which he and his friends, as youths in the Soviet Union, would
often read Communist propaganda magazines from Britain, as it was
one of the few international magazines the Communist government let
into the Soviet Union.
Sharansky and his friends soon realized that these magazines were
precious. Not because of the Communist propaganda they spewed, but
because they knew Britain had freedom, and they were shocked that a
government would let a magazine which criticized the government be
printed. If people out there were allowed to criticize their own
government, Sharansky thought that there must be hope.
As an addendum, I fail to see how the Cuban people's lives have been enriched in the last half century.
American imperialists and the American mafia were kicked out
of the island.
The big difference between Meyer Lansky and Fidel is Lansky only
got an honest cut for running honest casinos where the
exceptionally middle class Cubans (better off than most of Europe)
enjoyed an urbane life style whereas Fidel is worth around a
billion made purely through the extortion of being the big fat ass
on top of the government heap. Of course, he is not so fat now,
frail and phlegmy looking is more like it. Hey, Cuba Journal, do
you ever wonder why Fidel betrayed Ernesto in the first place?
In a just world, Fidel Castro would be executed by choking on a
cigar stuffed down his gullet in the middle of one of his
long-winded speeches.
-jcr
I can't help but be malicious when Communist are involved, but just so you know I'm not just screwing with you. When the services of assassins are employed, tokens from the target are often necessary to prove that the deed was executed. Photographs don't really prove much, even when they are not tampered with the scene can be staged, so tokens like hands and heads are used to provide proof of a kill. As Fidel showed 60 Minutes some years ago, he proudly has those hands of Ernesto in his possession which the Bolivian army sent him as proof the kill. What they got in return is anyone's guess.
And in the end the vicious become the infirm.How exquisitely egalitarian.
Cuba Journal -
Since you brought up Guantanamo, are you familiar with the mine
field that surrounds the base?
The mines aren't there to keep people in... the Cuban regime placed
them there to keep the people in and enjoying the fruitful freedoms
of apartheid.
Will you be playing Jay Chevalier's "The Castro Rock"?
WFMU did:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/24/nyregion/24towns.html
At this point the enbargo has become pretty pointless. At the same time, however, I think you are kidding yourself if you think that ending the embargo is going to make Cuba more free. First, Cuba is not 1970s China cut off from the outside world. Plenty of free countries in Europe trade with Cuba. It is not like the Cuban people are not exposed to outside influences. Second, the US trades with countries like China, Zimbabwe, Venezuala, Russia, Belarussia, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan, and any number of other tinpot dictatorships. Has trading with them made any of those countries more free? In many cases it may have made them less free by allowing the governments to have the wealth necessary to stay in power. Sadly, I am not sure Cuba will ever be free.
I hadn't heard that Fidel was suspected of having a hand in killing Che. I did know that he was suspected in having a hand in killing Camilo Cienfuegos.
American imperialists and the American mafia were kicked out
of the island.
And Russian imperialists and a Cuban kleptocracy was installed in
their place. Net benefit to Cubans? I doubt it.
Its worth pointing out the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe traded with the west during the Cold War. There was no embargo on them, and that didn't stop them from having shitty economies.
FWIW, "Cuba Journal", you'll find precious few authors for
Reason or posters on this blog that support-
1)Bush
2)The Patriot Act
3) Violations of civil liberties.
So fuck off and take it to Red State where there are people who
actually hold those views. We're not the neocon strawmen you're
looking for.
At the same time, however, I think you are kidding yourself if you think that ending the embargo is going to make Cuba more free.
It won't make Cubans any more free.
However, Cuba is one of those rare places where labor unions are
against the law, workers make $500 a year, and where anyone who
complains about job conditions goes to jail, and yet the left won't
scream about the sweatshops because the Cubans have big murals of
Che Guavara and that looks all revolutionary and cool.
A lot of European and Canadian corporations are getting very rich
exploiting the near-slave-labor, and without any of the negative
publicity you normally get for using slaves.
It is only fair that America gets its share of that slave labor...
and at the same time score a few points for being "progressive" for
doing buisness in Cuba. It is a win/win situation.
Cubans won't be free, but we will be getting commodities and labor
for just-a splash-above-free.
I'd take a Bay of Pigs II, too, if I could just privately organize and equip a fighting force and launch it without getting arrested by the US of A.
"Cubans won't be free, but we will be getting commodities and
labor for just-a splash-above-free."
The best way in the world to exploit workers is to do business with
the commies.
-jcr
"The reign of Fidel Castro marked a brutal and dictatorial
chapter for the Cuban people," says Flake."The reign of Fidel
Castro marked a brutal and dictatorial chapter for the Cuban
people," says Flake.
Absolutely true, but also true of every other chapter of Cuban
history.
Absolutely true, but also true of every other chapter of
Cuban history.
Not quite.
Absolutely true, but also true of every other chapter of Cuban history.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say Batista was better than
Castro Clan.
The best way in the world to exploit workers is to do
business with the commies.
Think of it as outsourcing your worker exploitation to overseas
experts.
One side benefit of free trade with Cuba: maybe the Castro brothers could see about ordering up some snappier military outfits for themselves. Jeezus, it looks like they're wearing leisure suits with a little military frou-frou tacked on. Today's smart generalissimo clearly should be better dressed.
Apropos of nothing . . .
I knew this guy who admired the *young* Che Guevara, but was sad
that Guevara grew up to be an oppressive Commie apparatchik. The
guys parents were Cuban refugees.
MM
Actually, Guevara had embraced the Trotskyite notion of "Permanent
Revolution", which the apparatchiks definitely did not like. So
Fidel sent Guevara out to foment revolution elsewhere and "die
gloriously in the cause of socialism."
Fidel got rid of a problem and gained a (conveniently) dead
hero.
Do you think we should catch Cuba Journal and put him in a zoo
for endangered species? (I mean after he finishes his service as a
superdelegate.)
The Venezuelan Student Movement for Liberty
POLICY FORUM
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
12:00 PM (Luncheon to Follow)
Featuring: Yon Goicoechea, Former General Secretary, Venezuelan
Student Parliament; Gustavo Tovar, Author, Estudiantes por la
libertad (Students for Liberty) (Caracas: El Nacional, 2007); and
Gerver Torres, Senior Scientist, Gallup. Moderated by Ian Vásquez,
Cato Institute
The Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Watch the Event Live in RealVideo
Listen to the Event in RealAudio (Audio Only)
On December 2, 2007, Venezuelans rejected through a referendum
constitutional changes proposed by President Hugo Chávez that would
have turned their country into a socialist state. The Venezuelan
student movement played the key role in that outcome. Student
leader Yon Goicoechea will explain how and why students from public
and private universities from across the country came together in
defense of basic liberties. Author and human rights activist
Gustavo Tovar will describe how the movement's philosophy of
nonviolence helped to forge an effective opposition. Gerver Torres
will discuss the significant impact of the "No" vote on public
opinion and politics in Venezuela and throughout Latin America. All
three speakers will discuss the future of the student movement and
of Venezuelan politics.
Registration for events at the Cato Institute closes 24 business
hours prior to an event; however, seating is still available. If
you would like to attend this event, please feel free to register
on-site. Thank you.
One side benefit of free trade with Cuba: maybe the Castro
brothers could see about ordering up some snappier military outfits
for themselves.
No one is stopping them from going to Milan right now and getting
the latest in Italian fashion.
"No one is stopping them from going to Milan right now and
getting the latest in Italian fashion." ( RC Dean)
Yes! Just like everyone in Chavez' cabinet does! They should follow
their example.
I would really really love to read/hear waht happens if this
lady Julia E. Sweig comes to this conference. She is the CFR expert
on Cuba and she ahs written several articles advocating the ending
of the trade embargoe. I bought her books and cotnacted her office
last year asking why she thinks all the CFR candidates seemed to
take the OPPOSITE position as her. She had no good answer.
Obviously the CFR leadership guys like Richard HAAS do NOT agree
with her. If she really cares about this issue she should attend
this event.
Julia E. Sweig info:
Nelson and David Rockefeller Senior Fellow for Latin America
Studies and Director for Latin America Studies
Award-winning author of Inside the Cuban Revolution and director of
numerous Council-sponsored Task Forces on Latin America. Her book
Friendly Fire: Losing Friends and Making Enemies in the
Anti-American Century was released in April 2006.
Phone: +1-202-518-3410
Email: jsweig@cfr.org
And if Reason has any real interest in opening up free trade
with Cuba it would help to figure out what can be done to get the
Council On Foreign Relations folks to help...unless you just think
the CFR has an agenda that includes screwing the America middle
class as much as possible.
No matter what you think about CFR's goals/motives...it certainly
does have an influence of foreign policy in this country. To ignore
that just makes you look frivolous.
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=516024&cc=5901
It's a sad state of affairs when playing pro soccer in the US is
considered a good career move.
any reprots on what happened at teh event...any talk of collaborating with CFR or do all of you refuse to admit its existence?
"It's a sad state of affairs when playing pro soccer in the US
is considered a good career move."
HTML Illiterate beat me to it.
It seems 7 Cuban soccer players decided to defect and stay in
Tampa. Now there are not enough men remaining on the Cuban soccer
team and they will have to forfeit.
Good for them. :-)
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245