Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
Do You Write Strong Manly Prose? Find Out at Gender Guesser
The Gender Guesser is based on some research done in 2003 by a team of researchers from the Illinois Institute of Technology and Bar-Ilan University in Israel who developed a method to estimate gender from word usage. Basically you paste in some text and the Gender Guesser provides a score letting you know how likely the writer is to be male or female.
I've plugged in several of my columns and they generally score male, but some show up as "weak male." Not to worry, "weak male" or "weak female" scores may just mean that one is writing like a European.
In addition, I scrounged around on Web for for some Ernest Hemingway, Mark Twain, Willa Cather and Margaret Mitchell. Their scores tended to cluster in the range of weak male and female. Next, I input some recent op/ed columns by George Will, Maureen Dowd, and David Brooks. Pretty much the same result. '
When you have an idle moment, try your hand at gender guessing by throwing in some of your own writing or that of authors in whom you are interested here.
Kudos to frequent commenter Rimfax for the link.
ce|3.7.08 @ 12:40PM|#
I pasted in a Spillane-style, profanity-laden redneck fight scene and scored female.
|3.7.08 @ 12:43PM|#
Don't know whether it's good or bad that my writing scored very
high on the male side, especially in the informal mode.
In my policy field, most of the analysts are male, so I may be
affected by that.
|3.7.08 @ 12:47PM|#
I pasted in The Call of Cthulhu and got weak male. Now
that's just wrong.
Washington's Farewell Address "friendship and trade with all
nations, entangling alliances with none"-- gets 51.72% WEAK MALE.
Who wrote this thing, John McCain?
|3.7.08 @ 12:48PM|#
I've plugged in several of my columns and they generally
score male, but some show up as "weak male."
You think the ones about global warming will make it change its
mind, Ron? Huh?
Taktix®|3.7.08 @ 12:49PM|#
What exactly make a word more likely to be used by a gender,
other than obvious references to genitalia?
This strikes me as being targeted toward the bottom-of-the-barrel
stereotypes.
On the other hand, perhaps we libertarians have long since shed
societal controls like gender roles, and therefore skew the
results.
I'm guessing the words they think are Male include:
Fart
Cock
Wrestling
Ribs
Bacon
life insurance
For Women:
Shopping
tramp
Bacon
Flowers
Unclean Down There
Marriage
Episiarch|3.7.08 @ 12:51PM|#
I put in this and now it doesn't work any more:
You're wrong! Jackson Roykirk, your creator, is dead. You have
mistaken me for him - you are in error. You did not discover your
mistake - you have made two errors. You are flawed and imperfect.
And you have not corrected by sterilization - you have made three
errors!
Click \'n\' Learn|3.7.08 @ 1:02PM|#
As they point out, the source code is right in the page, and it
doesn't look too good.
The following increase your male informal score: if, in, is.
Female informal: am, but, has
"Something" is +male, "everything" is +female.
Perhaps they need to explain why this isn't as simple-minded as it
seems.
TallDave|3.7.08 @ 1:05PM|#
OK, I call bullshit:
"Chuck Norris will punch you in the face, then JOhn Wayne will
crush your skull with a rock."
Genre: Formal
Female = 69
Male = 13
Difference = -56; 15.85%
Verdict: FEMALE
Jennifer|3.7.08 @ 1:05PM|#
A few months back someone showed me a similar program called the "Gender Genie," which claimed that all of my articles were written by a man except for my story about working on a phone-sex line. So Gender Genie only acknowledges my femininity when I'm faking orgasms? What a misogynistic prick.
Smart Ass|3.7.08 @ 1:22PM|#
So Gender Genie only acknowledges my femininity when I'm
faking orgasms? What a misogynistic prick.
Or maybe it confirms what I have always suspected based on your
posts and your history in the sex-industry...
Hermaphrodite!!!!
|3.7.08 @ 1:25PM|#
Hmmm....my appellant briefs are overwhelmingly male (one in opposition to a drunk driver's appeal was male 1085 and female 0) but my personal stories and essays covered the full spectrum. Seems I'm well balanced in my personal life but, when I put on the lawyer's hat, I become a complete dick.
Rimfax|3.7.08 @ 1:25PM|#
The website owner used this and some other analysis tools to
profile some
vandal/hackers.
Rimfax|3.7.08 @ 1:27PM|#
Jennifer,
I ran some of your old comments here and got FEMALE/FEMALE. I just
used the first few that came up in Google ("site:reason.com
Jennifer").
Jennifer|3.7.08 @ 1:30PM|#
I ran some of your old comments here and got FEMALE/FEMALE.
I just used the first few that came up in Google ("site:reason.com
Jennifer").
Well, my comments are written in a somewhat different style from my
professional pieces. Apparently, using a lot of crudeness,
prfanity, obscenity and vulgarity is a "female" trait. Huh. Who
knew?
Episiarch|3.7.08 @ 1:32PM|#
Apparently, using a lot of crudeness, prfanity, obscenity
and vulgarity is a "female" trait. Huh. Who knew?
I did, bitch! (said in falsetto)
Jennifer|3.7.08 @ 1:38PM|#
Now I know how to get in touch with my feminine side. Hooray! I hope it's not all gooshy, though.
Guy Montag|3.7.08 @ 1:42PM|#
Mine came back Chuck Yeager.
Somewhat offended to be confused with a Air Force fixed-wing
driver, but not that bad to be confused with that particular
one.
|3.7.08 @ 1:43PM|#
85% Male! Woo! My gender identity issues are OVER!
I think it liked that I used the word axiom.
Episiarch|3.7.08 @ 1:45PM|#
I hope it's not all gooshy, though.
So you said this just to temp me to be disgusting, then? Well, I'm
not taking your sloppy bait.
|3.7.08 @ 1:46PM|#
I pasted in a Spillane-style, profanity-laden redneck fight
scene and scored female.
Well, on the flipside, if you pasted in a profanity-laden catfight
(preferably in the mud), that would almost have to be male,
right?
stephen the goldberger|3.7.08 @ 1:46PM|#
my writing came back weak male.
best part:
"Weak emphasis could indicate European."
Jennifer|3.7.08 @ 1:55PM|#
Article criticizing proposed no-smoking-around-kids law:
Genre: Informal
Female = 432
Male = 1177
Difference = 745; 73.15%
Verdict: MALE
Genre: Formal
Female = 592
Male = 759
Difference = 167; 56.18%
Verdict: Weak MALE
Weak emphasis could indicate European.
.
.
.
.
So informally, I'm a man, but formally, I'm an effete European
man.
This is NOT a fucking improvement AT ALL.
|3.7.08 @ 2:03PM|#
I was consistently male until I threw in a letter with a reference to my son's dance lessons. Then I turned into a female. Think there is any connection?
|3.7.08 @ 2:08PM|#
I thought for sure I would come up female, given my hesitation
to the use of profanity but came up "Male". Who knew cursing was
female?
FUCK! (gotta get back in touch with my feminine side).
|3.7.08 @ 2:34PM|#
The first thing I got it to say anything other than "weak male" (including my own writing) was pasting the entire text of Rothbard's Do You Hate The State?. For that it just said MALE. Walter Block pieces also seem to rate as MALE. Bastiat also seems to rate as MALE, despite his euro heritage.
javier|3.7.08 @ 2:37PM|#
Mises, human action - MALE
An essay I wrote on GM in europe - MALE
MISES and I are the same!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am the same caliber of writer!!!!!!!
javier|3.7.08 @ 2:38PM|#
Nathan,
I put bastiat's what is money through and it was weak male, but the
whole piece is set in dialogue which might change shit.
|3.7.08 @ 2:39PM|#
Dagny walked straight toward the guard who stood at the door of
"Project F." Her steps sounded purposeful, even and open, ringing
in the silence of the path among the trees. She raised her head to
a ray of moonlight, to let him recognize her face. "Let me in," she
said.
"No admittance," he answered in the voice of a robot. "By order of
Dr. Ferris."
"I am here by order of Mr. Thompson."
"Huh? … I … I don't know about that."
"I do."
"I mean, Dr. Ferris hasn't told me … ma'am."
"I am telling you."
"But I'm not supposed to take any orders from anyone excepting Dr.
Ferris."
"Do you wish to disobey Mr. Thompson?"
"Oh, no, ma'am! But … but if Dr. Ferris said to let nobody in, that
means nobody-" He added uncertainly and pleadingly, "-doesn't
it?"
"Do you know that I am Dagny Taggart and that you've seen my
pictures in the papers with Mr. Thompson and all the top leaders of
the country?"
"Yes, ma'am."
"Then decide whether you wish to disobey their orders."
"Oh, no, ma'am! I don't!"
"Then let me in."
"But I can't disobey Dr. Ferris, either!"
"Then choose."
"But I can't choose, ma'am! Who am I to choose?"
"You'll have to."
"Look," he said hastily, pulling a key from his pocket and turning
to the door, "I'll ask the chief. He-"
"No," she said.
Some quality in the tone of her voice made him whirl back to her:
she was holding a gun pointed levelly at his heart.
"Listen carefully," she said. "Either you let me in or I shoot you.
You may try to shoot me first, if you can. You have that choice-and
no other. Now decide."
His mouth fell open and the key dropped from his hand.
"Get out of my way," she said.
He shook his head frantically, pressing his back against the door.
"Oh Christ, ma'am!" he gulped in the whine of a desperate plea. "I
can't shoot at you, seeing as you come from Mr. Thompson! And I
can't let you in against the word of Dr. Ferris! What am I to do?
I'm only a little fellow! I'm only obeying orders! It's not up to
me!"
"It's your life," she said.
"If you let me ask the chief, he'll tell me, he'll-"
"I won't let you ask anyone."
"But how do I know that you really have an order from Mr.
Thompson?"
"You don't. Maybe I haven't. Maybe I'm acting on my own-and you'll
be punished for obeying me. Maybe I have-and you'll be thrown in
jail for disobeying. Maybe Dr. Ferris and Mr. Thompson agree about
this. Maybe they don't-and you have to defy one or the other. These
are the things you have to decide. There is no one to ask, no one
to call, no one to tell you. You will have to decide them
yourself."
"But I can't decide! Why me?"
"Because it's your body that's barring my way."
"But I can't decide! I'm not supposed to decide!"
"I'll count to three," she said. "Then I'll shoot."
"Wait! Wait! I haven't said yes or no!" he cried, cringing tighter
against the door, as if immobility of mind and body were his best
protection.
"One-" she counted; she could see his eyes staring at her in
terror-"Two-" she could see that the gun held less terror for him
than the alternative she offered-"Three."
Calmly and impersonally, she, who would have hesitated to fire at
an animal, pulled the trigger and fired straight at the heart of a
man who had wanted to exist without the responsibility of
consciousness.
Her gun was equipped with a silencer; there was no sound to attract
anyone's attention, only the thud of a body falling at her
feet.
She picked up the key from the ground-then waited for a few brief
moments, as had been agreed upon.
Francisco was first to join her, coming from behind a corner of the
building, then Hank Rearden, then Ragnar Danneskjöld. There had
been four guards posted at intervals among the trees, around the
building. They were now disposed of: one was dead, three were left
in the brush, bound and gagged.
Total words: 748
Genre: Informal
Female = 1119
Male = 1072
Difference = -47; 48.92%
Verdict: Weak FEMALE
Weak emphasis could indicate European. Genre: Formal
Female = 715
Male = 723
Difference = 8; 50.27%
Verdict: Weak MALE
Weak emphasis could indicate European.
Jennifer|3.7.08 @ 2:50PM|#
Hey! I finally wrote something non-orgasmic which Gender Guesser
accurately realized was written by a woman! Here it is, in its
entirety:
MY BATTLE WITH PROSTATE CANCER
By Manly McRambo
"Shit!" I said. "My testicles are rotting from within. Ouch ouch
ouch this hurts and cancer sucks."
My wife, a woman with whom I enjoy regular heterosexual
intercourse, looked concerned. "You ARE current on your
life-insurance premiums, aren't you, dear?" she asked.
"Of course," I said. "Being that I am a man, I take my
responsibility to my family very seriously. I also enjoy going to
strip clubs and watching televised sports. Ball-scratching also
used to be fun, until that started to hurt too much."
Genre: Informal
Female = 80
Male = 44
Difference = -36; 35.48%
Verdict: FEMALE
Genre: Formal
Female = 152
Male = 86
Difference = -66; 36.13%
Verdict: FEMALE
Someone Who Doesn\'t Want to L|3.7.08 @ 3:09PM|#
OK, one of my articles and my statement of teaching philosophy
came back male (though as with a lot of people here, apparently, my
article showed euro-male in the formal setting).
I checked and I do indeed have the testes, so this is an excellent
program.
Someone Who Doesn\'t Want to L|3.7.08 @ 3:13PM|#
Jennifer,
In your story, you have the dude complain to much about his aches
and pains and discuss life insurance. The machine thinks that's
girly.
"About Gender Guesser" returns:
Genre: Informal
Female = 383
Male = 1460
Difference = 1077; 79.21%
Verdict: MALE
Genre: Formal
Female = 794
Male = 891
Difference = 97; 52.87%
Verdict: Weak MALE
Weak emphasis could indicate European.
|3.7.08 @ 3:19PM|#
That was brilliant, Jennifer.
I was consistently male until I threw in a letter with a
reference to my son's dance lessons. Then I turned into a female.
Think there is any connection?
I'd venture to say yes. Everything I ran through was firmly "male"
until I put in a piece of creative non-fiction about breaking my
leg at a high school dance. That was "weak female" until I removed
some words like "tulle" and "chiffon." Other than that, an
inorganic chem paper was the most androgynous of my "weak male"
writing.
I've seen my karyotype, and I'm definitely XX.
TallDave|3.7.08 @ 3:24PM|#
In your story, you have the dude complain to much about his
aches and pains and discuss life insurance. The machine thinks
that's girly.
Yah. More manly dialogue would go thusly:
"Are you busy, honey?" he asked. "No? Then bend over the couch
here. Ow! Ow! Ow... oh yeah!"
Genre: Formal
Female = 0
Male = 35
Difference = 35; 100%
Verdict: MALE
.|3.7.08 @ 3:47PM|#
If they actually wanted to do this, I can give them a few ideas.
It would actually be pretty interesting to see if one could develop
software that can accurately predict male or female based on
writings.
However, some crappy little javascript code is not the way to do
it. It looks like they are rating the "gender" of words themselves
-- they would be better suited with a database that updates itself
after each trial.
For instance, you submit text, it analyzes it then predicts your
gender. Then you tell it if it was correct. Based on that, it
adjusts the gender values of various words (only slightly) &
would even allow for the addition of new words.
.|3.7.08 @ 3:51PM|#
syntactic analysis would be interesting as well:
Do men and women (on average) use the same words in different
ways?
disclaimer:
I do not think this implies genetics as causation, obviously could
be cultural. Testing how well this sort of thing holds up over
different cultures and languages would be interesting as well. Its
just an interesting thing.
economist|3.7.08 @ 5:03PM|#
to the guy who's spoofing joe,
Please don't spoof joe while he's not around. Then I might pick an
argument with a satire. It's very difficult to know when it's a
spoof and when it's actually joe. I have posted this warning on
another thread, too.
|3.7.08 @ 6:45PM|#
economist:
I use this screen name, or "joe's an idiot" and use the same email
(except that I forgot a couple of times recently)
And I don't use joe's name or email. It ain't kosher, and anyway I
get no juice from teasing (baiting) an absent joe.
Robert|3.7.08 @ 9:03PM|#
I'm a boy. What's disturbing about the ratings of my writings at my site (linked from post ID) is that while I rate overwhelmingly male in my informal writings, usually male but sometimes somewhat female or European in my informal writings, in the one place I want to be most formal in the sense of serious, my resume, I come out solidly female. So it's like the more formal the circumstances, the more female it takes my writing to be.
Mad Max|3.8.08 @ 10:03AM|#
An excerpt from one of my articles was male.
I tried two 80+ post H&R comment threads, and they came up as
"male" (assuming we count comment threads as informal). I did a
H&R thread with about 35 posts, and it was "weak male."
Ann Coulter's latest column came up as weak male/possibly European.
Unless you classify the column as informal, in which case it's
male.
I plugged in a couple scenes from "Hamlet," and they were weak
male/possibly European. This is understandable, because Shakespeare
is technically European. Also, Hamlet was, let's face it, a
wuss.
But then I plugged in the last scene of Shakespeare's *Titus
Andronicus.* This is the the grossest, most violent scene in a
gross, violent play. It's the scene where Titus tricks the queen
into eating her own children. It came out as weak male/possible
European, just like the Hamlet scenes! Maybe it was the cooking
reference.
|3.8.08 @ 10:07AM|#
Hmmm...my failed "novels" came back as 'weak male possibly
EUROPEAN', whilst my overly verbose poetry and blogging came back
as overwhelmingly male.
It also forced me to confront what a mediocre writer I am when my
writing is more 'female' (disregarding my awesome usage of
descriptors).
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245