Nick Gillespie | August 5, 2007
I'm happy to announce that reason online once again broke another traffic record in July; we've busted our previous highs in each of the past five months. In July we pulled 3,016,469 visits, which represents a 69 percent increase over the same period last year and a boost up from June's (then-record-setting) 2.6 million visits.
Thanks to all of our readers and commenters for helping to make the site a hit. And please keep voting up our articles on reddit and digg--it's bringing in new readers every day.
Thanks also to all the bloggers and other sites who consistently link to our stuff, especially Instapundit, Arts & Letters Daily, Fark, and RealClearPolitics, who were among our top referrers last month.
We also want to give a shout-out to PJ Doland Web Design, the folks who built this version of our site and who are constantly working to make it even better. Since launching the new version of reason online last October, those server squirrels that bedeviled the site have gone extinct.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
those server squirrels that bedeviled the site have gone extinct.
You're welcome, Nick. I make sure to hit the refresh button
every 10 seconds or so.
Ruthless,
Ron Paul won the debate by a 10:1 margin, according to the ABC
Internet poll. Considering what a mess the ABC website is, though,
I think a lot of the oldsters got lost looking for the link to vote
at.
Yes! I knew that running around naked at the playground with the
Hit&Run URL tattooed on my penis would help you guys out!
...even if that's not why I was doing it.
Special thanks to joe and John, whose duels contributed 30% of
those hits!
:)
Many of the elderly people trying to vote in the ABC News poll ended up voting for Pat Buchanan.
Special thanks to joe and John, whose duels contributed 30%
of those hits!
QFT. I guess the Blue Team vs. Red Team stuff is good for
something!
It's "Trolly this" an' "Trolly that"
An' "Chuck'im out, the brute,"
But it's "Savior of'is website,"
When the guns begin to shoot.
[Do you like Kipling? / I don't know. I never kippled.]
And don't for get to thank me for my help you Ernst Rhoem
wannabes. Without my commentary things would've been real dull and
hardly anyone would challenge the political anilingus that "Reason
Magazine" displays toward Islam.
Maybe you should pay me.
"There's no need to fear; Underzog is here!" (and don't foget the
"Underzog" movie that just came out)
thoreau,
And they did it without having any abortion or gay marriage threads
in a long, long time. Of course, now that I'm filtered out by many
of my debate opponents, it might not work like it used to.
And don't for get to thank me for my help you Ernst Rhoem
wannabes.
Screw you, you Little Eichman(tm).
I'm happy to announce that reason online once again broke another traffic record in July; we've busted our previous highs in each of the past five months.
Thanks to all of our readers and commenters for helping to make the site a hit.
#!/bin/bash
while :
do
ping reason.com
done
You're welcome :)
[Do you like Kipling? / I don't know. I never
kippled.]
That joke is so old you must have resurrected it from one of the
zombie threads.
Special thanks to joe and John, whose duels contributed 30%
of those hits!
Not to mention about 65% of the verbiage.
Also, special mention has to go to Dan T., whose trolling elicited
75% of the flames.
Don't forget Juanita and/or Jane. I've been seeing a lot of newcomers getting reeled in by his/her/their fake trolling lately.
The first time I read the phrase "server squirrels" I had a
delightful little mental image of a squirrel in a little tuxedo
going around serving drinks and snacks.
I'll miss those little guys :(
I hope some Reseanoid blogs on this:
From Art and Letters Daily--
American prisons employ more people than Ford, G.M., and Wal-Mart
combined. With 5% of the world population, the U.S. has 25% of its
prisoners...
And thank YOU, Reason Online, for teaching us how to laugh about love... again.
Edward:
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/121101.html
Apparently, you're so concerned with trolling that you forgot about
this thread just over a month ago that you yourself commented
in.
Nick,
Was that 3 million figure of unique visits (from different IP
addresses)?
Nick,
Was that 3 million figure of unique visits (from different IP
addresses)?
Breakdown
joe: 522,000+/-
john: 465,000+/-
Other Reasonoids: 1,200,000+/-
Dan T. flames 432,000+/-
Dave Weigel flames 227,000+/-
"For a mag/site/blog called Reason" flames: 117,000+/-
"Drink": 117,000+/-
URKOBOLD: 57,000+/-
The remainder were normal people.
What on earth is a "server squirrel?"
No place like a blog to expose one's ignorance, so here goes:
Server = host computer, eg Hit and Run's website.
Squirrel = rodent, either on staff, like a hamster on treadmill, to
produce the energy on which said server operates, and/or
vagrantly/parasitically self-employed to subvert said server's
operations, on the model of Scientology's
squirrels.
The mammalian equivalents of gremlins, server squirrels were blamed
here for screen-freezes, unpredictable delays between hitting Send
and seeing one's witty remark publicized, posts disappearing, posts
appearing multiple times, parts of posts deleted, and all manner of
glitch.
The conceit of reason.com's rebellious server squirrels, ie its
recalcitrant collective engine capriciously failing to facilitate
the imperious ambitions of soi-disant mavericks, became a
handy vehicle of self-irony. It lent an accessible handle to
express oblique views on labor conditions, animal rights claims, a
Heideggerean gloss on technology's alienation from Nature, and
rueful indulgence in sensuality, as squirrels are at once winningly
cuddly and ferociously punitive.
In the good tradition of discipline-by-negative-reinforcement, I
stand ready to be shamed by wiser heads castigating me for omitting
learned semiotic borrowings about squirrels qua servers
from the likes of Heinlein, Jefferson, Bart Simpson, Janet Jackson,
Bill Gates, and Ayn Rand, which enlightenment I will receive
eagerly, suppressing any reflex to think, let alone respond with
something like, say, Nuts to you.
Edward:
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/121101.html
Apparently, you're so concerned with trolling that you forgot about
this thread just over a month ago that you yourself commented
in.
jf
Are you trying to tell me H&R never covers the same issue
twice?
For as often as Reason gets linked on Fark, they really need to
have a REASON image tag, like they do for other publications and
the state of Florida.
Do you have to make one and submit it?
If you want a really great way to boost the number of visits this site gets, you should take a page from the DailyKos and lie about getting 500,000 hits a day. Not only will the media ceaselessly parrot the bogus statistic, thus giving Reason much needed exposure, you will also have morons like Christopher Dodd claiming it imbues this site with absolute moral authority. Its a win-win situation for you.
Edward | August 6, 2007, 1:59am | #
I hope some Reseanoid blogs on this:
From Art and Letters Daily--
American prisons employ more people than Ford, G.M., and Wal-Mart combined. With 5% of the world population, the U.S. has 25% of its prisoners...
What can I say... Fuck Off?
Did you email this to Nick? If not, then quityerbitchin. If you
did, well you may want to email him about an "attaboy".
Congratulations and more importantly Thank You to everyone at Reason who is supporting the continued growth, I've enjoyed the magazine for many years, receive foundation publications at work, and make this my first site my first read every morning.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245