Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
Yale Students Assert Fake Sword Rights
The Yale Daily News reports:
In the wake of Monday’s massacre at Virginia Tech in which a student killed 32 people, Dean of Student Affairs Betty Trachtenberg has limited the use of stage weapons in theatrical productions.
Students involved in this weekend’s production of “Red Noses” said they first learned of the new rules on Thursday morning, the same day the show was slated to open. They were subsequently forced to alter many of the scenes by swapping more realistic-looking stage swords for wooden ones, a change that many students said was neither a necessary nor a useful response to the tragedy at Virginia Tech...
In a speech made before last night’s opening show of “Red Noses,” [Director Sarah] Holdren said that Trachtenberg’s decision to force the production to use wooden swords instead of metal swords will do little to stem violence in the world.
Via Kip Esquire.
|4.23.07 @ 10:54AM|#
At some point a person can become so smart that they 'tilt' and can't think reasonably at all. It appears that this can happen to universities as well.
|4.23.07 @ 10:55AM|#
Trachtenberg's decision to force the production to use
wooden swords instead of metal swords will do little to stem
violence in the world
Yes, but Betty feels better, and it shows that she's doing
something. And in the end, isn't that all that matters?
|4.23.07 @ 10:58AM|#
In a speech made before last night's opening show of "Red
Noses," [Director Sarah] Holdren said that Trachtenberg's decision
to force the production to use wooden swords instead of metal
swords will do little to stem violence in the world.
I like the way Holdren is willing to go out on a limb in her
speeches.
dhex|4.23.07 @ 11:06AM|#
when you're knee deep in the age of farce, hoi, stating the obvious is often required.
|4.23.07 @ 11:06AM|#
What if somebody comes at me with a real fake sword? How am I
going to pretend to defend myself?
I'm not saying greater availability of real fake swords would
eliminate all episodes of people being stabbed between the upper
arm and rib cage, and then sqeezning so it looks real when the
sword is pulled out, but at least it would give someone a chance,
and reduce the fake bloodshed.
|4.23.07 @ 11:08AM|#
Nobody should be allowed to own a toy sword without going through a background check and buying a permit. Think of the precious little one-eyed children!
|4.23.07 @ 11:11AM|#
Having used "stage swords" previously in high school
productions, I'd actually think that wooden swords might be more
dangerous than metal. Since we were teenagers and kinda dumb when
it comes to thinking things through, we'd have all sorts of
un-choreographed fights and would hit each other, but the dull as
chopsticks tips did nothing paired with the thin, bendable blade. A
wooden sword would either break (yay, thin poinky wood bits stuck
in you!) or hurt/bruise.
And that's on top of the obvious ridiculous idea that even faker
swords is necessary, let alone after a widely known gun act. Wow,
that was badly worded. You know what I mean.
|4.23.07 @ 11:12AM|#
Yale is a private school so let's see if the drama-student market punishes it for this unpopular symbolic gesture.
|4.23.07 @ 11:17AM|#
Yale is a private school so let's see if the drama-student
market punishes it for this unpopular symbolic gesture.
Do ticket sales relate to grades?
Guy Montag|4.23.07 @ 11:22AM|#
Theater majors are not far behind English majors as people who need to be monitored closely.
Guy Montag|4.23.07 @ 11:27AM|#
Having used "stage swords" previously in high school
productions, I'd actually think that wooden swords might be more
dangerous than metal.
Safety is not an issue here. Scaring the scaredie-cat wimps is the
issue.
In other news, Jeff Gordon won the Subway 500 in Phoenix on
Saturday night.
|4.23.07 @ 11:37AM|#
You know, I don't like censorship or silly feel good rules more
than the rest of you, but this seems pretty clear cut.
Yale is a private institution. The students are using Yale theater
facilities, and presumably Yale theater funding, to put on this
show. It is Yale's right to place restrictions on the use of these
resources.
db|4.23.07 @ 11:40AM|#
You gotta fight (dun dun)
For your right (dun dun)
To parry!
thoreau, parrying is an act of self defense. And we know that there
is no place in civilized society for anything like that.
|4.23.07 @ 11:41AM|#
I guess the real lesson of this thread is that symbolic gestures are really easy to make fun of.
thoreau|4.23.07 @ 11:44AM|#
Yale is a private institution. The students are using Yale
theater facilities, and presumably Yale theater funding, to put on
this show. It is Yale's right to place restrictions on the use of
these resources.
All those points are true. There's still nothing wrong with
pointing out how dumb it is.
Of course, if I accept the points that you made then I have to
revise my previous post.
You gotta fight negotiate a mutually agreeable
contract (dun dun)
For your right contractual right (dun dun)
To parry!
Or, if that isn't possible:
You gotta fight use your market power to find a
suitable drama school that will allow (dun dun)
For your right contractual right (dun dun)
To parry!
Somehow it doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
thoreau|4.23.07 @ 11:44AM|#
I guess the real lesson of this thread is that symbolic
gestures are really easy to make fun of.
For once, you and I agree 100%.
|4.23.07 @ 11:44AM|#
Does this really surprise anyone? The Ivy league is particularly inclined to such vaporous reasoning as this. It's their job to be unreasoning, hyperventilating ,politically retarded amoeba. So, let it be . . . it's mildly entertaining and reminds of the scene in Amadeus when the actors are all prancing about on stage without an accompanying score after an acute political overreaction took place. Even the Emperor could see that it was nonsense. "Just look at em!"
|4.23.07 @ 11:45AM|#
It just so happens that I own two fake swords--a rapier and a
claymore. The latter is only fake in the no-sharp-edges sense--it
would function quite well as a bludgeon. Still, I don't think a
wielder of such a "sword" could do much damage on any mass
scale.
Of course, there is the case of Sir Lancelot and his misconduct at
a certain wedding feast.
|4.23.07 @ 11:46AM|#
It is Yale's right to place restrictions on the use of these
resources.
Nobody's saying it isn't.
It's just really pointless and stupid. And it's being done by
someone who's attached to an istitution that's always bragging
about it's high intellectual standards.
And just as it is Yale's right to place restrictions on the use of
its resources it is everyone else's right to ridicule really
pointless and stupid policies.
|4.23.07 @ 11:47AM|#
The late-'90s "Romeo and Juliet" movie should be banned... not for gunplay or being sensitive to tragedy, but because it in itself was a steaming pile.
mllh|4.23.07 @ 11:49AM|#
Yale is not a private institution. Yale, like most other so-called private institutions, receives a huge amount of public funding through research grants for faculty, federal student loans, ad nauseum.
thoreau|4.23.07 @ 11:49AM|#
PL-
Yes, but do you own a high-capacity sheath? Is it a semi-auto
sword, that can inflict one wound per slashing motion of the arm?
Is it an assault sword with a special grip?
Ron Hardin|4.23.07 @ 11:53AM|#
How come if the Dean lady says no swords in plays, anybody pays
attention? What's she gong to do about it?
All it does is cement her crazy lady in the attic reputation.
|4.23.07 @ 11:59AM|#
I feel I must take a moment to defend my Alma Mater. Betty T, as she is widely known, has a long history of doing ridiculous things that defy logic, and it would be a shame if her decision were at all interpreted as representative of the school's students or even of its faculty. She is thankfully finally retiring this year, and will hopefully bother us no more. In general Yale has been pretty good on freedom of expression, and Yale has a pretty strong statement in support of it, which this action clearly violates. No institution is perfect.
mllh|4.23.07 @ 12:08PM|#
Seriously, I know it's fun to make fun of this crapola. Violence
is part of humanity. All our literature is based on either sex or
violence (you know, the two forms of humor). And only really stupid
San-Francisco-ites like this faculty dare do something like
this.
On the other hand, it would be nice if none of our plays or novels
or political discussions or date conversations or movies or poems
or ads or games or interior decorating ever involved anything
violent. I don't fault the idiot for wanting to keep students
mercifully free of bad things, especially in light of recent
events.
But come on! We're not smurfs. Keep eliminating even stage violence
and you'll produce wussies who just stand there like deer in
headlights waiting for a less-than-smurf-like bastard to kill
them.
|4.23.07 @ 12:09PM|#
This is her reasoning (from another article on the same site
linked above, dated today). It's even more ridiculous than I
thought. May be their right as a private institution to do this,
but it's my right under the first amendment to say how silly it
is.
--------
The new restrictions were put in place to protect people in the
Yale and New Haven communities who live or have friends who live in
Virginia, or who have seen people die by gun violence, Trachtenberg
said. She said the outcry from students upset with her decision has
been exaggerated.
"I think people should start thinking about other people rather
than trying to feel sorry for themselves and thinking that the
administration is trying to thwart their creativity," Trachtenberg
said. "They're not using their own intelligence. … We have to think
of the people who might be affected by seeing real-life
weapons."
The new restrictions do not ban all types of stage weapons,
Trachtenberg said. She said she did not prevent an instructor in
theater studies who talked to her on Friday from using a dulled
knife to cut a cabbage head in a production, for example.
|4.23.07 @ 12:11PM|#
This week-end I saw a high school production of Peter Pan. It was a PC minefield, what with Peter declaring to the Indians that he was the 'great white leader' and an effectively effeminate Hook stealing the show. But I was given pause when one actor pointed a pistol at another's head...
|4.23.07 @ 12:17PM|#
With that kind of reasoning, I'm only surprised she went to a
sword ban instead of plastering advertising and posters for the
play with "WARNING: CONTAINS SWORDS". Of course, merely mentioning
that plays can have swords might upset people affected by gun
violence.
So why is knife violence on cabbages okay, then? Just because I
didn't have a cabbage patch doll as a child doesn't mean I should
speak for those who had them and were scarred by having sold them
in yard sale violence.
|4.23.07 @ 12:22PM|#
"She said she did not prevent an instructor in theater
studies who talked to her on Friday from using a dulled knife to
cut a cabbage head in a production, for example."
And the angel said unto me,
"These are the cries of the carrots, the cries of the
carrots.
You see, reverend Maynard, tomorrow is harvest day and to them it
is the holocaust."
|4.23.07 @ 12:23PM|#
"We have to think of the people who might be affected by seeing
real-life weapons."
She should be laughed off the campus. This is the most ridiculous
statement I've heard in a long time.
|4.23.07 @ 12:26PM|#
She said she did not prevent an instructor in theater
studies who talked to her on Friday from using a dulled knife to
cut a cabbage head in a production, for example.
So who do they authorize to pre-cut the cabbage before it makes it
on stage so that it can be simul-cut by a dull knife? Is the
cabbage cutting supervisor properly vetted? All background checks
in place? Is the knife registered, in case it gets lost?
|4.23.07 @ 12:44PM|#
I'd like to make a distinction that some people don't seem to
get.
Yes, Yale is a private university. It has the right to dicitate
that in place of fake swords its productions must use peeled
bannanas if it wants to.
Everyone else has the right to call bullshit on it. Having the
right to do something doesn't contain the right not to get
criticized.
What we don't have the right to do is force them to use a
non-stupid fake sword.
|4.23.07 @ 12:44PM|#
Someone had to take action after the stage sword massacres in "Pirates of the Caribbean" (both the ride and the movie). How many animatronic and CGI pirates need to die before we get tough on fake swords?
|4.23.07 @ 12:46PM|#
'you saw Peter Pan and only thought Hook was effeminate?'
Good catch, but Peter was played by a girl.
mllh|4.23.07 @ 12:48PM|#
It's a completely separate issue, and discussing it here would be a worthless tangent, I admit; but I reiterate that Yale is NOT a private institution.
|4.23.07 @ 12:55PM|#
'It's a completely separate issue, and discussing it here would
be a worthless tangent, I admit; but I reiterate that Yale is NOT a
private institution.'
Roger that.
|4.23.07 @ 1:18PM|#
It just so happens that I own two fake swords--a rapier and
a claymore. The latter is only fake in the no-sharp-edges sense--it
would function quite well as a bludgeon.
My Dad's naval officer's sword has no edge to speak of but it has a
point that you could quite handily run someone through with.
We used to play with it all the time when were were kids. We were
lucky noone got his eye poked out. When I was about seven I thought
it would look real neat with some "blood" on it. Man it took a lot
of mineral spirits to get that red oilbased paint off. :)
|4.23.07 @ 1:35PM|#
Isaac,
Now that you mention it, I think the bludgeon has a sharp point on
it, too. Maybe it's less prop that I've been led to believe.
I used to wear the rapier back when me and three friends used to
wear musketeer costumes to Halloween events. Over the years,
though, the venues became more and more restrictive about the
swords. Grrr.
Robert|4.23.07 @ 2:03PM|#
Everybody knows the swords are fake, so the problem is with the
sentiment that they use ones that
look real, so they instead use ones that look
conspicuously unreal, to prove they care? This reminds me of some
other silliness.
One is the street signs near a school for the deaf in Manhattan
that consist of finger spelling "SCHOOL FOR DEAF"
(using stylized drawings of hands) instead of writing it in regular
letters.
Another is the recent practice of dressing child models and actors
in ads for bath toys, etc. in brightly colored or
otherwise conspicuous swimsuits instead of trying
to conceal their wearing of swimsuits.
Yet another was the controversy over the yearbook photo of the high
schooler in chain mail.
|4.23.07 @ 2:18PM|#
When I was a little tyke (three, maybe) I used to walk around everywhere with an enormous plastic toy sword strapped to my belt. You could never get away with that kind of thing now...
|4.23.07 @ 2:30PM|#
Wooden swords can be much more dangerous.
Miyamoto
Musashi who probably won more duels to the death than any other
person in history preferred wooden practice swords to the real
thing. He found that the crushing injuries it produced were more
incapacitating than clean cuts.
peachy - my kids have a knight's costume. they love marching around
with swords and shields, although when my daughter was one, she
feltthat the sword should be held by the blade and not the hilt.
:)
|4.23.07 @ 2:40PM|#
Now that you mention it, I think the bludgeon has a sharp
point on it, too. Maybe it's less prop that I've been led to
believe.
Well the Naval Sabre is purely ceremonial, of course, so the edge
for slashing is no longer required. I suspect the point is still
there because, well frankly, wouldn't a sabre with a rounded end
look stupid? My Dad carried in a few parades, at least once all
decked out in cocked hat and frock coat (a uniform sadly missing
from the modern navy).
I believe that the navy still had a few cutlasses around in the 20s
to issue to a few enlisted men for boarding parties but supply
officers on heavy cruisers in the South Pacific did not get much
opportunity for hand to hand combat.
I used to wear the rapier back when me and three friends used
to wear musketeer costumes to Halloween events. Over the years,
though, the venues became more and more restrictive about the
swords. Grrr.
The sword has unfortunately ended up in the family my father's
second wife. One of the grandkids took it to school for Show and
Tell in the late 80s or early 90s. Everyone was impressed. Of
course now the little bugger would be jailed.
|4.23.07 @ 2:55PM|#
I wish we had an aristocratic class in the U.S. . .and that I was a member of it, of course. Then I could threaten to run through someone who careens into my injured shoulder. Honor is honor, after all.
|4.23.07 @ 3:06PM|#
Everybody knows the swords are fake, so the problem is with
the sentiment that they use ones that look real, so they instead
use ones that look conspicuously unreal, to prove they
care?
Uh, so what's the problem again? Outrage that a college play will
not be as violent as perhaps it could be? The horror.
|4.23.07 @ 3:17PM|#
Roger that. They are(were?) one of the more common "stage" weapon manufacturers. High carbon steel with a lifetime guarantee, provided you don't sharpen the edge.
|4.23.07 @ 3:19PM|#
Some of the prop swords are pretty nice. The rapier came from some Spanish manufacturer and has ornate etchings on the blade.
|4.23.07 @ 3:27PM|#
I'd like to see Hamlet without all of the swords. And sans
poison.
Well, they did try to do The Merchant of Venice without
the anti-semitism at the Stratford (Canada) Shakespeare Festival a
few years ago.
Absolutely nobody liked it so they won't be trying it
again.
|4.23.07 @ 3:31PM|#
Julius Caesar without the assassination.
Macbeth without. . .um, well, with nothing at all.
And Passion plays without the crucifixion.
|4.23.07 @ 4:06PM|#
When I was a little tyke (three, maybe) I used to walk around everywhere with an enormous plastic toy sword strapped to my belt. You could never get away with that kind of thing now...
What kid during the '80s didn't have a plastic He Man sword?
BY THE POWER OF GREYSKULL!
|4.23.07 @ 4:11PM|#
Uh, so what's the problem again? Outrage that a college play will not be as violent as perhaps it could be? The horror.
Shakespeare without violence is like a Romance novel without a love
scene, a sci-fi show without a hot alien chick, or an Ayn Rand
story without a violent rape sequence.
|4.23.07 @ 4:28PM|#
Well, I was in one of these productions with blunted swords, and someone substituted a real pointy sword--and put poison on it! You wouldn't believe the carnage! I still think Fortinbras was behind it.
Jennifer|4.23.07 @ 4:36PM|#
Theater majors are not far behind English majors as people
who need to be monitored closely.
Excuse me? I use my mad English skills to write grammatically
correct essays explaining why gun control is bullshit.
|4.23.07 @ 5:23PM|#
Were Gimli and Legolas lovers? What about Sam and Frodo? Sure
looked like it in the movies, that's for sure.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245