Nick Gillespie | October 24, 2005
That collective yawn you heard emanating from Washington, D.C. over the weekend? That was the response to Steve Martin being honored with the eighth annual Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center on Sunday.
Martin joins other has-beens and comic milquetoasts such as Richard Pryor and Carl Reiner in taking home the prize, which certifies that you haven't been truly funny for at least the past 20 years. When Pryor became the first ex-comic to be entombed with the Twain award in 1999, some wise fool advised America to "Send Out the Clowns," including one Steve Martin:
The ex-wild-and-crazy guy, who once spoke in a stoned manner of "getting small," devoted album sides to banjo playing, and made clever movies such as Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid and The Man with Two Brains, has fully achieved his goal of becoming Woody Allen West. That is, he's a "serious" artiste now, having appeared in a Broadway - yes, that serious - production of Waiting for Godot, penned his own dramedy about Einstein and Picasso meeting in Paris, and contributed to The New Yorker, all without ever once inspiring laughter, amusement, or entertainment - or for that matter, any insight whatsoever into the existential human misery to which he has contributed significantly (Sgt. Bilko is a surer sign that God is dead than anything Jean-Paul Sartre could cook up). In short, Martin has become every bit as mummified - and in clean-and-sober hindsight, every bit as unfunny - as the King Tut he once sang about with such reckless abandon.
More here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I recently listened to the audiobook of Martin reading his novel
The Pleasure of My Company. It was quite funny. I also thought
Picasso at the Lapin Aguile was funny, if only for the fact that it
hinges on a time-travelling Elvis.
The fact that Suck routinely praises the current run of SNL is
indicative of what they consider funny.
You must be kidding...
Cocaine is still quite popular... perhaps not
hysterical-cover-story-of-a-news-magazine popular, but still pretty
popular.
I also enjoy Martin's stuff, although his essays have a bit too
much of a "Look, I went to an Ivy League school!" feel to
them.
And, although it's been more years than I want to acknowlege, his
portrayal of the dentist in "Little Shop of Horrors" was
hysterically funny.
Too true Nick. In recent years I started thinking that I was
loosing my sense of humor with age. Everything that is suppose to
be hysterical, I find to be stupid (everything ever made by Adam
Sandler, Tom Green, and Jim Carry e.g. Dumb and Dumber indeed). But
then I saw an old SNL hosted by Steve Martin when he was on his
game and laughed my ass off.
Since then I've been re-listening to the funny men of my youth,
Bill Cosby, and George Carlin circa 1970. I've dusted off older
stuff like Tom Lehrer and Lenny Bruce (but did Dick Gregory
actually make anyone laugh?). Movies ranging from Dr. Strangelove,
to Blazing Saddles, to Caddyshack, I still think are
brilliant.
The problem with funny is, it's only truly funny once. I can't
remember the last time I laughed as hard as I did the first time I
listened to "Let's Get Small". Anyone care to nominate something
produced in the past twenty years?
You use his "king tut" song to illustrate what you consider to be the peak of his comedy??? That's just sad, and it gives good perspective to the rest of your thoughts.
Well, if your idea of comedy only extends to Hollywood movies,
then you're right.
However, if you cast your cultural net a bit father, you discover
he hasn't lost his talent as much as moved on to other areas. His
play, Picasso at the Lapin Agile, for instance was absolutely
brilliant comedy.
"Martin joins other has-beens and comic milquetoasts such as
Richard Pryor..."
I'm sorry Nick, but calling Richard Pryor - unquestionably the
greatest stand-up comedian of all time - a 'comic milquetoast' is
laughable and NOT in a good way.
Perhaps you didn't like his movies with Gene Wilder and I realize
that MS has slowed his pace of creativity just a tad, but I can't
possibly imagine what compelled you to say this.
Come to think of it, what did?
Two clarifications:
1. However poorly phrased in the old Suck piece, my point re: "King
Tut" is that it was never funny and that Martin was now unfunny
like that all the time.
2. Re: Richard Pryor. Whether he's the greatest blah blah blah of
all time notwithstanding (what could that possibly mean, really?),
I was calling him a has-been, not a comic milquetoast (that's Carl
Reiner in that sentence).
"The fact that Suck routinely praises the current run of SNL is
indicative of what they consider funny." Uh, Jeff? Suck hasn't been
updated in five years...
There's some truth to the general observation that funny young
comedians rarely become funny old comedians. Maybe you can't be fat
and happy and still be funny - which might suggest why angrier,
more political comedians stay funny longer (assuming they started
out funny; why anyone ever saw anything in Al Franken is beyond
me). What about Chevy Chase, for example? He was huge back in the
'70s, and where is he now? Starring in Karate Dog III or
something?
Nick,
Kinda mean-spritied and unnecessarily harsh, don't ya' think.
I rather liked L.A. Story and a number of other Martin
ventures. Sure, sometimes he does crap and falls on his face and
sometimes he churns out some genuinely interesting stuff.
Picasso at the Lapin Aguile is - despite your opinion -
kinda cool.
Comic Milquetoasts? Come on, Nick. These guys ALL blazed new trails
in comedy and entertainment for lots of people on lots of
levels.
Maybe they are no longer relevent...but they were and
noone can take that away from them. You ought to have a little more
respect for that.
Anybody can be a critic. And it takes neither talent or guts to
knock others when they don't measure up to your narrow, subjective
standard.
The lesson is that there is a finite window of funny in any human being. The faster culture changes, the shorter the window. All comedians should strive to burn like the sun for a year or two, then settle down into a career in writing where amusing is good enough.
We can quibble about the reliability or accuracy of qualitative
measurements for determining what 'the greatest stand-up of all
time' means, I agree. It is hard to put into real terms what
Pryor's title actually defines.
But what is not up for debate is that a) black comics like Chris
Rock, Eddie Murphy, Jamie Foxx and Damon Wayans probably would not
exist were it not for Pryor's groundbreaking efforts, b) the
stand-up comedy landscape today - particularly with including truly
dark honesty in material - is shaped in large part by Pryor's
influence, c) some of the greatest comics of our generation
(including the aforemention) like Bill Hicks, Sam Kinison, Doug
Stanhope, Jim Norton, Patrice O'Neal, Louie C.K., Nick DiPaolo, and
Colin Quinn have all acknowledged Pryor as an influence, hero and
inspiration to their lives and art.
I guess I also don't understand the title of 'has-been.' Isn't that
reserved for someone who's talent and appeal is past its prime, yet
they force themselves into the spotlight anyway they can, thereby
embarassing themselves in their efforts? Pryor has made his share
of creative errors, but something about 'has-been' doesn't seem to
fit.
That or I am a Pryor nuthugger.
Looks like we have more proof here that comedy is not
pretty.
It might be that being funny takes too much energy for most
comedians past a certain age to pull off. The few that I can think
of who've remained funny beyond middle age have done it by having
some kind of workable formula (Dangerfield?) or more rarely out of
sheer brilliance (Groucho). When I hear Carlin these days he sounds
like the crankiest old man on the planet (still funny sometimes),
otherwise they tend to lose their edge or leave comedy
altogether.
Anyway, what's the big deal about giving these guys awards, even if
they are past it? Nobody thinks to honor them much when they're hot
because they're such smartasses usually, while at the same time any
actress with a nice face and a hot bod can get lucky and pick up an
Oscar if she gives a halfway decent performance in a successful
movie.
In other words, lighten up, Nick, you'll be a cranky old fart
yourself before you know it.
Warren,
As for nominating something funny in the last 20 years, how about
the Tenacious D album?
They managed to lampoon the entire hair-metal genre in one album,
and the final song, "City Hall," is a whole rock opera rolled into
one song.
It's not as laugh out loud funny, but funny when you think back 15
years -- the crap Tenacious D writes about today was actual serious
material back then.
Then again, maybe I'm so starved for substance that I am willing to
lower my standards (wait, what standards?)
The Jerk = Lifetime Comic Pass (for Carl Reiner as well)
I was born a poor black child in Mississippi.
Best opening line in the history of the written word. Fuck Tolstoy.
(ok, it's not technically the opening line, but that's how it's
remembered)
Pappa Johnson: Son this is shit. This is Shinola. Shit. Shinola.
Shit. Shilnola.
Navin: That's shit and that's Shinola.
Pappa Johnson: You're gonna be fine son.
I watched it the other day and it still holds up. Martin has gotten
a little high tone, but so what. That's the point of success. Make
a lot of money so you can do the projects you want to do and give a
rats ass if anyone likes it. He is Woody west in that way.
My favorite Martin anecdote is the way he handles autograph
seekers. He wordlessly gives them a card with his signature
inscribed with these words:
This certifies that you have had a personal encounter with me and
that you found me witty, charming and intelligent.
Pompous? Maybe. Funny? I think so.
So get off Martin's back and remember theses simple keys to
life:
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get
rid of it.
"some of the greatest comics of our generation (including the
aforemention) like Bill Hicks, Sam Kinison, Doug Stanhope, Jim
Norton, Patrice O'Neal, Louie C.K., Nick DiPaolo, and Colin
Quinn"
I have to object to this. If you want a list of people who think
being angry or uselessly profane is a substitue for being funny,
this is close to it with the addendum of Colin Quinn, who has never
amused anyone. These guys may think Pryor influenced them, but all
they heard was "fuck".
Sounds like someone's just a little cranky because he didn't get
a chance to attend last night, because those of us who were there
definitely weren't feeling bored or let down. And complaining that
recipients of "lifetime achievement"-style awards aren't in the
full creative flush of youth has to be one of the sillier things
I've ever seen.
As far as the comments go, including sour-faced button pushing
hacks like Patrice O'Neal and Nick DiPaolo in the same list as Bill
Hicks is very nearly sacrilege. These guys would barely even have
careers if it wasn't for Colin Quinn's unlamented canceled Comedy
Central "talk" show.
Bill Hicks and Kinison = Greatness
Stanhope = Flashes of really good
Louie C.K. = Better writer than stand up
Norton = Wants to be a bad boy but went on Last Comic
Standing
DiPaolo, O'Neal, Quinn = Eh - sometimes I chuckle
How did Whoopi Goldberg ever win this prize? Even one doesn't personally care for the comedy of Reiner, Newhart, Winters, or Tomlin, one has to admit that they certainly had a popular and influential body of work. But Whoopi?
Brian,
Objection noted...and overruled.
Yes sir, Bill Hicks comedy albums/DVDs/biographies are still
selling even 12 years after his death because all he ever did was
jiggle his genitalia on stage and toot a bicycle horn while he
screamed "pussy fart!!!"
Louie C.K. and Jim Norton suck so bad, they're writing and staring
(respectively) in a new HBO sitcom.
I don't understand why comics beg Colin Quinn for facetime so he
can critque their sets. I've seen with my own eyes a couple of
times, but I just don't understand why they'd want expert advice
from one of the most scientific comics around when they bomb just
fine by themselves.
Patrice O'Neal licks so much balls his new HBO One Night Stand
special is being acclaimed by comics nationwide.
Sam Kinison? He just yelled a lot. That's why people filled
stadiums to listen to him.
Nick DiPaolo is so awful he won a couple of Emmy's for writing for
some show no one's ever heard of called "The Chris Rock
Show."
People, wake up. Everyone loves to criticize entertainers despite
knowing jack shit about what they're talking about while they
forget to realize they live their lives in complete anonymity for a
reason. Look, we post comments on a blog written by other people.
Guess what? That's free and anyone chimp smart enough to operate a
mouse and keyboard can do it. I don't know about you, but my
parents are proud of me now that I post comments people forget
about after 3 nanoseconds.
Honestly, what the fuck have you done with your life where people
wait in line and fill huge venues to listen to what you have to
say? I'm not trying to be a dick, but your statement is just
ridiculous.
Whoopi wins beacuse they needed to give an award to a black
female comedian and Moms Mably was dead.
I don't know. I've never understood Whoopi. Or Billy Crystal for
that matter. Talk about a guy who gets less funny with every
birthday. Why don't you bust his balls Nick?
Old people aren't very funny. I know because I'm getting old and turning into a grouch.
Not a Bama,
Agree with you 95%.
Norton will always be a pussy in my eyes for doing Last Comic
Standing. But other than that I agree with your take on all those
guys. But, don't play the what have you done card.
We can't criticize because we don't have sitcoms or have never done
stand up? Well I guess I shouldn't post anything about the feds
fucking up the Katrina response because I've never run FEMA. That's
retarded.
I am the audience. It's these guys� jobs to amuse me. If they don't
I reserve the right to say they suck. And just because they have a
sitcom or a stand up special doesn't mean that they are geniuses.
If that were the case I would be wrong in saying that I wish Jim
Belushi had shot up with a speedball instead of John. Or that
Carlos Mencina is a fucking hack's hack that's not even Mexican or
funny. Or that Pauly Shore owes me for the air he takes from me
every day by walking this earth.
When you accomplish what Pryor accomplished and then have to
stop doing comedy (stand-up, that is, his best medium, by far)
because of a crippling disease, is it really fair (or even very
nice) to call him a has-been?
And Carl Reiner is unsurpassed as a comedy writer/performer in the
20th century. Grab some of Sid Caesar's DVD's and watch Reiner and
you'll have to admit he was an absolute master. The fact that he
also co-wrote and directed "Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid," is
important, as well. He might not be to everyone's taste, but there
has never been a greater comedy performer than Carl Reiner.
Ralphus -
Fair enough. I don't like Mencia or "According to Jim." But there's
a real biiiiiiig difference between saying someone sucks and "They
don't appeal to me."
And if people want to someone's not good, they a) probably
shouldn't list the best comics out right now as evidence since and
b) they should probably know a lot about comedy and stand-up before
opining so fervently.
If someone doesn't appeal to you, ok, cool. My dad is a smart guy,
but doesn't like Hicks and there's any number of reasons to explain
that. But I'd bitchslap my dad if he ever tried to make the claim
that Hicks isn't talented.
It's impossible to be hilarious for several decades running. The
best a comic can do is to morph into a regular, albeit witty,
actor. Steve Martin, meet Bill Murray.
Comedy is like Rock & Roll in this respect. I love Sticky
Fingers, but I wish Mick would just stop it already.
Norton will always be a pussy in my eyes for doing Last
Comic Standing.
Why is Jim Norton trying to make money (not easy as a stand-up, no
matter how good you are) on Last Comic Standing make him a pussy?
That man is fucking funny. And while there's nothing wrong with not
liking Bill Hicks (or even Carl Reiner) the fact that he's loved
and admired by most successful comedians (not because of his
"message," but because he knew how to write and tell a joke),
counts for a little more.
I think that Gillespie's choice of the phrase, "has been," to
describe Pryor was just plain sloppy, something I wouldn't have
expected from a person who makes words his business. It doesn't
seem right to use that term to describe people who were taken out
of the game by accident or disease, as Pryor was.
"Has been" seems more fitting to describe someone whose talent or
relevance was found wanting in the normal course of artistic or
commercial competition, or who walked away from the limelight by
choice or personal failing, but who keeps trying, in vain, to
recapture or at least trade in past glory.
Regarding Martin, I thought "The Jerk" was a waste of my time and
money, but I have been entertained and even amused by other Martin
efforts, over the years: I always thought he was a better comic
actor than a stand-up comedian (I also loved his dentist in "Little
Shop of Horrors"); he was perhaps best as a writer. I'd be
interested to know the extent of his contribution to the old
Smothers Brothers show, which remains a fond memory from my
pre-teen years.
I thought Pryor deserved the Twain prize, as his best routines were
always honest, human, and uniquely American. Pryor made waves and
scandalized the prudish with his use of street vernacular and
situations; Twain employed regional dialect and slavery to similar
effect in "Huckeberry Finn." I wasn't so sure about Tomlin's
suitability for the prize (though I have loved her work as well),
and for that matter, I doubt that I would have nominated, much less
voted for, any of the other winners of the prize -- not because
they weren't funny (at least, at times) or that I didn't like and
respect their work and influence on the field, but because I never
saw them as kindred spirits to Twain (as, for instance, I saw Will
Rogers, Groucho Marx, and Richard Pryor). Martin just doesn't seem
right for the prize, but I expect that Twain would have appreciated
his banjo playing, as I do.
Alright - my comments have been reduced to a series of typos. That means I'm finished on this topic. Peace.
The Picasso play was hilarious. Martin's essays have been
hilarious. The fact that he decided to grow rather than continuing
to show up on stage with an arrow through his head and repeating
the same old schtick gets Kudos from me even if it doesn't tickle
your funny or any other bone.
It is a shame that that hollywood doesn't support an artist like
Martin and he has to do crappy slapstick to make a check but there
is no shame in that. He is still putting out intelligent and
hilarious stuff even if you have to look for it. Try "How I joined
Mensa".
He was the best host of the Oscars since, well I can't think of
anybody that came close. Didn't Bob Hope do those once?
Whoopi Goldberg hasn't been funny since Color Purple.
bb
I don't know. I've never understood Whoopi. Or Billy Crystal
for that matter. Talk about a guy who gets less funny with every
birthday. Why don't you bust his balls Nick?
Word. For the record, I like about half of Whoopi's work, Jumpin
Jack Falsh was a gas (sorry, had to go there). I think her
one-woman show I saw back in the 80's was brilliant. But I have
never found Billy Crystal anything more than mildly amusing, and
that includes his stand-up and his work on SOAP.
I'll also throw in Robert DeNero and Ben Stiller as actors that are
always unfunny.
As far as Richard Pryor being the genesis of black comedy. That's
just stupid. There were dozens of ground breaking black comedians
before him. Redd Foxx, preceded him by fifty years for crying out
loud. Bill Cosby credits his early brand of comedy with trying to
distinguish himself from all the other black comedians who were
universally talking about race.
Not A Bama,
Fair enough back at cha. That list probably wasn't the best list of
modern comics to bag on (still hate Norton). But any one of those
guys would have no problem saying another comic sucks. I don't
remember Hicks saying that Leno wasn't his cup of tea. But I do
remeber him doing an impression of Leno eating an UZI.
Just to be clear, Redd Foxx preceded Pryor by about 20 years. I think Pryor was as funny as Bill Cosby was, just in completely different ways.
I don't remember Hicks saying that Leno wasn't his cup of
tea. But I do remeber him doing an impression of Leno eating an
UZI.
There are three reasons for that, in my opinion.
First, when you're a successful and admired comedian, your opinion
regarding comdedy carries more weight than someone who enjoys
comedy, but never makes it.
Second, Hicks (like most of us) thought that Leno used to be a
great comedian (and Leno actually helped Hicks on his way up), but
that he'd completely changed into shill for superficial,
middle-American values.
And finally, Hicks was dying of cancer when he did that bit and I
think he was in the "anger" stage.
Les,
Anyone that touched that show was a pussy. He was worse to me
because he talked shit about how stupid it was while trying like
hell to make it on. What is it Jimmy? Are you a bad boy or a
network friendly comic? Make up your mind. Besides that, I've never
heard one memorable line from him. It's all pretty generic angry
comic stuff. That and I have some kind of irrational hatred for
him. Besides that he's great.
Now to open another can of worms - can someone explain Dane Cook to
me?
But why is a comic a "pussy" for trying to make money on a network show? How many comedians have made a living doing shows they thought were stupid? That's not being a pussy. It's surviving in show business.
I just want to draw some attention to Martin's oft-overlooked comic masterpiece, The Man With Two Brains.
First, when you're a successful and admired comedian, your
opinion regarding comedy carries more weight than someone who
enjoys comedy, but never makes it.
I don't buy this. I've never played football, does that mean I
can't say the Texans suck? I've never written a novel, does that
mean I can't say the DaVinci Code is crap? Professional opinions
are not necessarily better opinions. Exhibit A: Joe Theisman.
I've watched as much comedy as anyone out there. I know what's good
and what's bad. And I also know that it's all just my opinion. Jeff
Foxworthy's Blue Collar Empire attests to that.
Most of the great comedians were funniest while they were neurotic fuck-ups. Money and age have a way of curing neurotic fuck-upedness...
Ralphus,
I don't disagree with you. It's not an absolute. I just always find
the opinions of people who make art more interesting than the
opinions of those who enjoy it.
In regards to their art, that is. I don't give a fuck what an artist thinks about foreign policy, for instance.
I don't give a fuck what an artist thinks about foreign
policy, for instance.
Me neither. They should stick to something they know something
about. Rainforest biology, for instance.
Les,
You're right. I can't knock a guy for trying to make a buck.
Especially if your Gary Gulman or John Heffron. But if Little Jimmy
Norton is such a rebel, why would he want to go the Saggat route?
Sure Saggat has lots of cash, but is he happy? Probably. But that's
not the point.
We talk about age ruining great comedians; network TV has been the
downfall of more careers. For every Seinfeld and Raymond there are
thousands of shitty pilots featuring neutered comics smoldering in
a heap.
Now some guys can make network work for them. Carlin was extremely
mainstream in his early days, but he parlayed that success into the
ability to do things the way he wanted to. The difference is now
you don't have to play the game to make it big. I�m not personally
a fan, but Dane Cook is a good example. Here's a guy that has built
a cottage industry around himself with very little mass exposure.
Now he's getting film work and will probably have a sitcom before
too long that he'll have substantial control over because he's
bringing a bankable name with him. He didn�t whore himself out to
the net on a fucking reality show.
Hicks would have ripped Jimmy Norton a new one.
Hey, maybe Norton is miserable with himself already. Then your
vengeance will be complete!
I see Dana Cook going the comedy/action/cop movie route. Or
something. I'm not a fan either, but he certainly is enthusiastic.
About something.
Damn your drunk tests are hard.
The Man With Two Brains was great.
Dr.Hfuhruhurr: You. You're the elevator killer. Merv Griffin.
Merv Griffin: Yeah.
Dr. Hfuhruhurr: Why?
Merv Griffin: I don't know. I've always just loved to kill. I
really enjoyed it. But then I got famous, and - it's just too hard
for me. And so many witnesses. I mean, *everybody* recognized me. I
couldn't even work anymore. I'd hear, "Who's that lurking over
there? Isn't that Merv Griffin?" So I came to Europe to kill. And
it's really worked out very well for me.
Les,
I relaize my hatred of Norton is bordering on obsessive. I'll let
it go.
I'm Dave Attel fan myself. When it comes to fat, bald and bitter
drunken comics there can be only one.
I hang out wth an albino, a midget and a guy that thinks Lord
of the Rings is real. Together we call ourselves the
Unfuckables.
ralphus,
And Carl Reiner co-wrote and directed The Man with Two Brains
thirty years after he was a huge TV star on Sid Caesar's
shows! Never should anyone slag on Reiner. Ya hear that Gillespie?!
Never!
And I'm in complete agreement about Dave Attel. He's so fucking
quick and can really write a good joke. I love him.
Not only is it hard to stay funny for long, but looking back at
things that used to be funny, it's usually hard to figure out why
they were so funny in the first place.
The Stooges are the exception that proves the rule.
The Marx Bros. remain hilarious, especially in their earlier movies. And again, Sid Caesar's shows had moments of timeless brilliance.
For one, I saw Dave Attel live and became a fan only after that,
because his ability to read a crowd is not conveyed on
television.
Secondly, as far as crap sitcoms, I recently read an article about
90210 cast members -- a sort of "where are they now" thing. Three
or four of them have sitcoms ready to take over the mid-season
cancelled sitcoms. It's like a backup tank to ensure the shit
stream doesn't run dry.
One comic that seems to have been ommitted so far is Steven Wright.
Deadpan is extremely hard to do well, and the only other one in
recent memory who pulled it off is, of course, Bob Newhart.
Woody Allen, Mel Brooks, Neil Simon, Carl Reiner ...
Ceasar had a murderers row of writing talent behind him.
I want to get a full body tattoo of myself only
taller.
Wright is great. Too bad his southern comedy cousin Mitch Hedberg
had to check out on us.
Picasso at the Lapin Agile was quite good -- probably one of the funniest plays I'd see at that point. Hell, it's been 5 to 10 years since I saw it, and I still fondly remember the line: "A four corner triangle is what Euclid rides IN HELL!".
Don't forget Carl Reiner created the wonderful Dick Van Dyke Show, patterning it after his own life. ("Richie" is meant to be Rob Reiner!) Even hacky Garry Marshall (tho I like him OK) helped write some later DVDS episodes like the very funny "Odd But True".
I'm surprised nobody appreciated the capitalist sentiment
expressed by Martin:
In receiving the award, Martin called it "the only significant
American award for comedy -- except for money."
Beautiful.
"As a Libertarian, I believe that consenting adults have the
right to do whatever they want, except band together."
-- Emo Phillips is pretty
timeless.
You are right. He is not funny any more. Now, redneck standup,
that's hilarious!
Thank God for redneck standups. If they weren't here to pave the
way for the future of standup comedy, God knows where we would
be.
P.S. Who is Rick Prier?
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245