Julian Sanchez | August 23, 2005
I have no problem in principle with sex-ed programs that focus on abstinence—assuming they're actually effective and don't make those who end up having sex more likely to become sick or pregnant for lack of information, which is a significant if. But it was a little disturbing to see that federal tax dollars have been funding this:
Teenage graduates of the program sign a covenant "before God Almighty" to remain virgins and earn a silver ring inscribed with a Bible passage reminding them to "keep clear of sexual sin." Many of its events are held at churches.
Until the ACLU filed a lawsuit alleging misuse of government funds, the Silver Ring Thing's website apparently laid out their goals pretty clearly:
Among the removed items are the organization's newsletters, which contained a clear statement of the Silver Ring Thing's religious purpose: "The mission is to saturate the United States with a generation of young people who have taken a vow of sexual abstinence until marriage and put on the silver ring. This mission can only be achieved by offering a personal relationship with Jesus Christ as the best way to live a sexually pure life."
Additionally, the Silver Ring Thing's original "12 Step Follow-Up Program" has been modified. Prior to the lawsuit, the website contained only one version of a follow-up program. Now, the site offers a "10 Step Secular Follow-Up Program" and has renamed its 12-step version to include the words "faith-centered" in the title. The new program removes step two, which encourages using the Abstinence Study Bible and step four, which asks students to understand that "God has a plan for his or her life, and a plan for his or her sexuality." And "Deb's Diary," a section of the website that encouraged students to pursue faith and to find completion in Christ, has also been removed.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
God has a plan for his or her life, and a plan for his or
her sexuality.
What if God's plan for me is to fall down that slippery slope of
Man on Dog sex!
And if you're going to find "completion in Christ" you'd better be a good shot with a sniper rifle.
What if God's plan for me is to fall down that slippery
slope of Man on Dog sex!
Then that wasn't God's plan for you.
As someone who is abstaining until marriage, I have never seen how
these programs are supposed to work without (in my case, the
relationship with Christ part) religion. It's why I can't get
behind (pun away) this on a public policy level. Besides, I think
it's lame using gummint money to do our work. We already got the
tax exemptions.
Some Straight Edge kids claim to try, but I don't know any, so I
don't know their success rates. My guess is not so good.
There have been several (well, three) tv programmes about the
American virginity thing here. Apparently, many of the kids who
take the pledge don't consider bj's to be "sex".
There was also an interesting article in The Economist (July 30) a
week or so ago about AIDS funding and abstinence.
The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to "abstinence until marriage" as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in "risky behaviour" - prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
...
The administration is also against all needle-exchange projects for drug addicts, one of the groups most likely to contract, and spread, AIDS in Russia, India and China.
That's from the leader.
I've met a couple of straight edgers in my day. I have to say that my immediate gut reaction was that I'd never encountered a group of people in such dire need of a cigarette, a snort of bourbon, and a good screw.
Apparently, many of the kids who take the pledge don't
consider bj's to be "sex".
And that's from the leader before the current one. I've also heard
people say that about anal sex. Everyone is looking for a
loophole.
The belief among many of them is that it only counts as sex if it can't possibly lead to pregnancy.
I may be jaded, but I've never understood that whole "saving
yourself for marriage" bit. Sex is just sex and I think everyone
would be a lot calmer if they stopped attaching all these weird
mystical qualities to it.
Hmmph. And what about good, honest, loyal Christians who get
divorced? Do they have to save themselves all over again until they
get married the second time? Or does only the first time count?
Reminds me of years ago when I was in high school. The little Christian brats in Young Life (a Christian youth club for HS kids) were the ones who partied the hardest and the most often outside the metalheads. I always thought that was interesting.
Johnny Clarke--
Good loyal Christians aren't supposed to divorce in the first
place.
Extrememly tangential, but I hope worthwhile for someone --
great song on NPR today from The Leisure Class, "Jesus Almost Loved
Me, but He Missed".
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4811940 -
audio to come later on today.
Jennifer,
But, but...wasn't Ronald Reagan a good, loyal Christian? And what
about our president's brother, Neil?
cynical bastard-
Early on, prior to conversion, simply unable to score. Greatly
aided by crappy social skills.
Social skills are better, so now, I'm abstaining.
Johnny-
Sex is just sex and I think everyone would be a lot calmer if
they stopped attaching all these weird mystical qualities to
it.
People would be a lot calmer if they did, but they don't. I don't
think most can.
And what about good, honest, loyal Christians who get divorced?
Do they have to save themselves all over again until they get
married the second time? Or does only the first time
count?
I'd say they should save themselves again until the second
marriage.
Johnny and Jennifer-
Good loyal Christians fail. Christ says try again but follow me
better this time.
I can't fathom what President Ronnie's beliefs were from his public
side. Michael Reagan made that speech at the funeral that his
father was a Christian, but I feel (based on zero research) that's
what Micahel wanted to believe.
The Bush clan is odd. IIRC, Ma and Pa are conservative
Episcopalians, GW is an born-again conservative Methodist and I
think JEB is some kind of conservative Catholic. The adjective is
consistent. So Neil could be anything as long as its
conservative.
Actually catholics can't divorce. Most christain sects allow it, although they tend to sway in the direction thier donations come from.
Sex is just sex and I think everyone would be a lot calmer if
they stopped attaching all these weird mystical qualities to
it.
wrong...
sex is as powerful as many mind altering drugs and causes major
boundary dissolution, especially so when there are powerful
emotions attached to the act. there is something mystic about
it.
OK, I was confused to find out that Herman is a devout
Christian, because I had him mentally confused with Henry the angry
atheist from weeks of yore. May they never meet.
Jeff, Catholics may not be able to get a secular divorce (that's
officially recognized by the church), but they can get their
marriages annulled. From what I hear, how easy it is depends on who
you approach to get the process started.
David-
Used to but stopped. Really difficult. I was really sad after I
threw out my pr0n collection.
Jeff-
Do you know how the annulment thing works? I've never asked my
Catholic friends.
Herman,
My aunt had her first marriage annulled. From what she said, it's
like the pre-marriage counseling in reverse. Your marriage is
struck from church records, and you pretend like it never happened.
Kind of like an expunged arrest.
Herman,
My aunt had her first marriage annulled. From what she said, it's
like the pre-marriage counseling in reverse. Your marriage is
struck from church records, and you pretend like it never happened.
Kind of like an expunged arrest.
Stevo-
That's funny because a lot of people guess Henry when they forget
my name. Maybe he's my doppelganger? In personally dark moments, I
do have these atheistic leanings....
I wouldn't buy a pair of shoes without trying them on, or purchase a car without test driving it, no way in hell I'd make a long-term committment to a gal without seeing how well we worked in bed. Two years dating a total prude woke me up to that reality, gah, and that was during college too. Waste. Of. Time. Damn.
Herman,
You have a will of iron.
Annulment can be done if the church is able to determine that the
couple never had a "real" marriage. Things like not consummating
the marriage, one person not intending to have children, having an
affair that started before the marriage, one partner being gay, or
in the very old days, a barren wife, would qualify. Naturally, cash
and influence could help someone get a annullment too.
I had a ton of sex in high school. Unfortunately, it was with myself. I didn't get a silver ring or anything.
Don-
Well, no other people or animals involved. You would have qualified
for the ring. Whoopee.
Randolph/Flagrente Delectio - So are you Jane/Juanita then or just
trying to be her successor?
It's funny how the christian abstinence thing not only doesn't work, but completely backfires. I grew up in the middle of mormonville, utah (and haven't been back since) and i can tell you, sex ed in school was basically just "don't do it" and nothing more. abstinence was the ONLY thing they taught, and i believe it's still the curriculum policy today. Anyway, I don't think there's a highschool in america more filled with sexually active teenagers than the one I went to. Everybody was rebelling against the EXACT same rules and norms so the rebellion itself gained a lot more speed.
no, not jane or juanita. I was so frustrated at work today, i thought I would try to raise the hairs on the back of a few peoples' necks, but alas I am outed.
Didn't the Clinton administration get hell when they sought to include the teaching of masturbation as a normal, healthy activity in sex education? Isn't that the most effective way to encourage abstinence?
Didn't the Clinton administration get hell when they sought
to include the teaching of masturbation as a normal, healthy
activity in sex education?
No, Clinton fired Surgeon-General Joycelyn Elders because she
suggested it.
But the Clinton Admin did get into trouble a few weeks
earlier whe the same Elders questioned the War on Drugs esp
marijuana prohibition. Clinton (you know the one who told Rolling
Stone that MJ should be legalized two weeks before the 2000
election) quickly caved and said she didn't speak for the team. I
always wondered if she had been used to float a trial balloon.
Hmmmm-
They did, but a lot of that was a combination of "how dare we talk
about sex in public" and "I hate Clinton, what can he be clubbed
with?" I'd say w/o a religious component, masturbation is the
logical step for those abstaining from sex.
The doesn't solve the it's "kinda lame component" of it. Or to what
LVpine was getting at; that when the school starts endorsing
something kids start thinking the opposite is good. Sure, a couple
of kids might say "yeah, the health teacher is making sense" but
I'm going to guess more would go against it. Really a no win. Darn
kids.
"Do you know how the annulment thing works? I've never asked my
Catholic friends."
I've been told that the difficulty of getting an annulment varies
widely by the diocese and priest. A friend of mine (who DID wait
until marriage) went through a grueling annulment 6 years later
during which her family was called in to "testify" against her.
Apparently, many of the kids who take the pledge don't consider bj's to be "sex"...whew!...that was a close one.
Generally speaking, if a Catholic wants an annulment, he'll have an easier time if his name is Grimaldi or Kennedy.
I think it's a good idea that the celibate are starting to identify themselves by wearing a silver ring...hopefully this will avoid that awkward moment at the end of the third date. Still, a lot of people wear silver rings...having "NO" tattooed on your forehead would be a clearer statement of your non-intent.
Didn't promise anyone but myself to remain a virgin in HS, for religeous reasons. Wasn't a mistake, but the girl I was saving myself for sure wasn't worth it because she didn't want to save herself. Well, she did, but a bunch of Christian psychodrama got in the way and it turned all bipolar. Maybe they should explore and discuss why saving yourself and then working, growing, and learning with one partner is preferrable to meeting someone with whom your body clicks and then not being with them the rest of your life and pining for those feelings. I'm just saying.
This is all pretty amusing - well, except for the American government's complicity in numerous AIDS deaths and unwanted pregnancies via its bullshit religious test for aid money.
The thing I don't get about having oral sex to remain a virgin
is how the hell you're supposed to stop it from progressing to
"actual" sex. Do people actually have serious relationships where
it just stops there?
Anyway, this is one of those topics where my inner Randroid outs
itself... abstinence seems like denying one's true nature,
sacrificing so much of the joy of being human for a "higher", and
therefore empty and imaginary, ideal.
I grew up in a strict pre-Vatican II Catholic family (with the
exception of my evangelical Lutheran mom) and thus, the idea of
having sex before marriage was something you didn't even think
about without having a rosery and a preist to confess to handy. Of
course, I carried this line of BS into high school where I loudly
denounced any and all forms of sexual activity. I went as far as
calling a class mate a "whore" for daring to challenge my beliefs
during a health class debate on the topic. I didn't date; not that
it mattered since as the high school geek I was deemed
"untouchable" by the rest of the student body.
Now, as a 30-year-old atheist "technical virgin", I really regret
what I thought then.
GAH! Somehow this got posted before I had a chance to
finish:
I grew up in a strict pre-Vatican II Catholic family (with the
exception of my evangelical Lutheran mom) and thus, the idea of
having sex before marriage was something you didn't even think
about without having a rosary and a priest to confess to handy. I
didn't date. Not just because I was the school geek whom every
female laughed at, but because my parents didn't allow it. The
really scary thing was, I actually believed this crap well into my
early 20s.
I carried this line of bullshit into high school where I loudly
denounced any and all forms of teenage and/or premarital sexual
activity. I went as far as calling a class mate a "whore" for
daring to challenge my beliefs during a health class debate on the
topic. I didn't understand why I was being sent to the principal's
office. After all, I had "God" on my side.
Now, as a 30-year-old atheist "technical virgin" (and not by
choice), I really regret that I didn't have a "wilder" childhood. I
now envy the kids I used to say where going to Hell for getting
laid on prom night, or earlier. At least they had some fun when
they were young enough to appreciate their good looks and
hormone-fueled appetites. Now I'm staring down the barrel of
middle-age and only have to look forward to dating drooping and
wrinkled middle-aged douche bags. Joy.
My advice to America's youth: Get laid. Get laid now because it
doesn't get any better when you're older and uglier. Use a condom.
Use the pill. Don't listen to the morality mongers and teenaged,
Christian, brown-noses like I was. Fuck! Fuck like there is no
tomorrow.
Wow Randolph. I'm sorry to have to say this, but you're the worst troll ever. I guess it's true about always returning to the scene of the crime. Although, I don't think they usually come back in the same clothes wearing a nametag.;)
I didn't get any at all until I was nearly out of college - not for religious reasons, but because I was clueless around females. Looking back from near-fifty, my greatest regret in life is that I wasn't more "assertive" with women, from high school on.
Go Akira, Go!
Wiser words were never spoken. You have to shoot while the geese
are flying. And shoot some of the sanctamonious bible thumpers
while you are shooting your wad.
Shem,
And I would've gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for that
meddling Cavanaugh, and his little server.
Timothy: Nice to know you thing of your girl as a car or a pair of shoes. Property.
What never seems to come up in these discussions is the
disconnect between our grandparents, who went through puberty at 14
and got married at 16; and our kids, who are going through puberty
at 12 and ideally getting married after college at 22.
There's a difference between being chaste for a year and for a
decade. Particularly when to some of the moralizers "chaste" means
you don't even see a drawing of a member of the opposite
sex from the time you're weaned to the time you're wed.
Damn! My budding career as a troll has been struck down in
its youth...
Ha, ha!
If wanna fly like the eagles you have to learn to piss with the big
boys, Randolph.
Larry A- My grandparents didn't get married at 16. They married at 25 and 23, respectively, exactly on the average for my grandfather, a man of the WWII generation, and only one year younger than average for my grandmother. But then, my grandfather at least didn't have the same pressures to remain celebate that kids today have. For most of history, pre-maritial sex was tacitly accepted in this country. It was implied heavily that if you get caught, you wind up marrying your partner, but as long as you did it was no problem. This absolutely no sex until marriage idea is relatively new historically.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245