Matt Welch | May 31, 2005
In one of the biggest let-downs in the history of hype, Watergate's "Deep Throat" apparently turns out to be ... W. Mark Felt.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"In one of the biggest let-downs in the history of
hype..."
Does that mean you were hopin' for Al Haig or Henry
Kissinger?
...Even if it really had been Kissinger, the revelation would have
been too spectacular to believe.
Or Buchanan. Or Rehnquist. There were lots of sexier suspects.
It was somewhat anti-climactic, but kudos to those who have been
claiming it was Felt for some time now.
Now if we only knew who killed Nicole Brown Simpson.
But Woodward and Bernstein and Bradlee all refuse to confirm this? I'm still wondering if Deep Throat wasn't a composite character. Supposedly he wasn't in the first draft of their book.
W&B refuse to confirm or deny, still sticking to their promise to reveal DT's name post mortem. But we'll see if they change their mind in light of this.
Since nobody other than Felt will confirm it, I say, blah. My money is on David T (see above)...nobody will confirm or deny him either. Nobody'll really know until W&B bite it. And even then, my general reaction will be, Blah.
If he really was Deep Throat, why would Woodward and Bernstein refuse to confirm it? Pish and tosh.
Well, on reading the piece, it SOUNDS pretty compelling. But
after poking through some of Noah's stuff over at Slate, I'd say
that there's a question of Felt's mental acuity after his stroke.
So there's probably a question of whether he was as clear to his
kids as the article presents him to be. And since it's not
altogether certain that Felt's voluntarily admitting it, I can see
why W&B wouldn't confirm it.
I'm pretty sure it's accurate. But if it turns out to be wrong, I
won't be stunned. (Actually, the bummer was finding out that
Woodward had officially denied it was Diane Sawyer.)
Jennifer's right.
...it looks like all three of 'em, Bradlee, Bernstein and Woodward
confirmed that it was Felt.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Matt, I submit that it's really worth having heard of W. Mark Felt. (Whippersnapper.)
If W. Mark Felt married someone named Ivana B. Tupp, could she call herself Ivana B. Felt-Tupp?
Is it just me, or is it pretty fucking bizarre to have a picture of some snaggle-tooth old man with the banner headline "I am Deep Throat"?
I see all the Nixonites are crawling out of the woodwork to
defend their boy and comdemn Mr. Felt as a "traitor" (Buchanan),
violating the ethics of law-enforcement (Liddy) and the man who
caused the fall of Cambodia (Ben Stein, with a straight
face).
Me, I say sic semper tyrannis...
Maybe I'm just too young to have much of an interest in this,
but why is this such a big deal? ... breaking news! that's right
folks, it's still fresh after 30 years!
I dunno... seems more suitable for the gossip column than the front
page.
Yeah, I understand the guy was involved in one of the biggest
political scandals of recent history, but according to Bernstein
and Woodward, all he did was confirm things they found from other
sources. Doesn't strike me as all that interesting. I'll have to
ask my parents if it's more important if you lived through the
events.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245