Matt Welch | May 2, 2005
In case (like me) you don't follow football, the
House Committee on Golden Showers
House Committee on Government Reform used the National Football
League as its second professional patsy last week, revealing along
the way that our nation's money-thieving
scolds lawmakers, led by John "Who Else?" McCain, are
drafting one-size-fits-all drug-testing legislation.
[E]very major professional sport and college athletic association would be subject to a uniform testing policy, with the nation's drug czar overseeing the list of banned substances.
My question -- Why stop at "major"? You think Badminton players aren't on the juice? You think anybody on this team hasn't enjoyed a "reefer"?... Though I suppose in this case sarcasm just gives these power-intoxicated legislators even more terrible ideas. Consider that this mentality is spending your tax money, and "reforming" your government:
Asked by reporters why there was a need for a uniform, government-authored policy, [Reform Committee Chairman] Davis [R-Va.] said that, for starters, steroid policy would no longer be negotiated as part of labor agreements.
In addition, Davis said, such a law would "send a message to amateur and professional sports: 'These (drugs) are illegal. It won't be tolerated.' It just gets rid of this issue."
Davis predicted that three or four bipartisan bills would be introduced. "I don't know how the public feels about this," he said. "But I think members (of Congress) are pretty united on this: It's a huge issue and it needs to be taken care of."
Just think how many "issues" we could "just get rid of" through the magic of putting the feds in everyone's bathroom! I hear this book has many useful suggestions! Of course, state lawmakers are having their fun, too:
[New Jersey State Senator Nicholas] Sacco has introduced a bill in the state Legislature that would allow all schools to randomly test student athletes.
Lawmakers in New York, Connecticut and Michigan, meanwhile, are also proposing steroid testing programs for high school athletes. [...]
"We need to show students while in high school that drug abuse can have some very serious consequences."
Why stop at high school? Oh,
nevermind.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
How long before someone actually proposes a "think about the
children!" amendment to the CotUS?
Let's see, a new food pyramid, a centralized drug testing, what's
next? Nationwide mandatory mile jogs?
And what the hell is this line about?
"I don't know how the public feels about this," he said. "But I
think members (of Congress) are pretty united on this: It's a huge
issue and it needs to be taken care of."
Hey, Chairman Dumbass, this PUBLIC of which you speak is why you
have a job in the firt place!! Congress isn't a personal playground
for whatever the hell you asshats decide is the topic du
jour!!
Does anyone know if I can return my government frto it's point of
purchase?? I wanted "democratic republic" but this tastes alot more
like "communist nanny-statism".
As long as they're in bathrooms, will they report toothpaste
tubes with caps not properly re-screwed?
I sure hope so.
Seems like they should... efficiency and all.
Ruthless,
Don't forget about squeezing the tube from the front!!! I've always
wondered when "they" would do something about that...
From Encarta 2045:
"Looking back from the devastation which is now New York, and the
subsequent collapse of American civilization, it seems puzzling why
legislators of the time were obsessed with minutia such as
drug-testing and abortion, while neglecting glaring security
problems like insecure nuclear and chemical sites as well as porous
shipping lanes. The failure to secure all incoming freight cargo
(one of the most obvious structural security deficits), of course,
is what led to the deaths of 18 million Americans, and the
widespread panic which gripped the nation after the deadly Marbury
Virus Shipments incidents of 2011..."
I think we need to find a male Republican that pees sitting down
and threaten to "out" them.
Then watch how fast we get Big Brother out of the bathroom!
Look on the bright side, guys--isn't it wonderful to live in a country so Utopian and perfect that the government can spend time worrying about pippy-poo problems like the honesty of professional athletes? I mean, it's not like we're a country at war with a steadily rising deficit and diminished international prestige and a rising theocratic class and an economy in the toilet, or anything. THAT would be asinine, you see.
I've said this here before, but I think it bears repeating: I think those of us who are under forty WILL live to see a time when all employers are required to drug-test their employees, just as employers are now required to ensure their employees are either citizens or green-card holders.
My question -- Why stop at "major"?
Why stop at athletes? It's time Congress did something about the
competitive advantage of sugar and caffeine abuse in the computer
programming industry.
a time when all employers are required to drug-test
their employees
Please, Lord, let it be soon. I have bills to pay and this clean
piss just ain't moving!
I have it on good authority that there are Ph.D. students out
there who abuse their bodies with massive amounts of Mountain Dew
in order to do their research and write their dissertations.
This is clearly an outrage, and it's unfair to those who can't
tolerate the same level of abuse and still compete.
I don't like to watch steroid-crazed 400-pound monsters trying to pulverize each other on artificial turf, while a bunch of half-wit speed freaks known only by their first names (Terry! Howie! Poopy!) bark out nonsense at the half. Also, I gots things to do on Sundays....
So when will someone introduce a mandatory weekly piss test for all members of Congress, their staff, and all of their families? We can't have our laws be made under the influence of anything other than religious zealotry, bribes, and power madness!!!
thoreau--
It's worse than that. If it wasn't for crystal meth and Jolt cola,
I'd *still* be in grad school.
It's time Congress did something about the competitive
advantage of sugar and caffeine abuse in the computer programming
industry.
Three words, Rhywun: Don't. You. Dare.
Also, I gots things to do on Sundays....
So you forsake a sport that plays on two or three days a week for
one which plays constantly from 1 PM to 2 AM ET, 7 days a week, for
6 months plus playoffs? That makes sense... ;)
I don't like to watch steroid-crazed 400-pound monsters
trying to pulverize each other on artificial turf, while a bunch of
half-wit speed freaks known only by their first names (Terry!
Howie! Poopy!) bark out nonsense at the half. Also, I gots things
to do on Sundays....
I admit it: I have a bloodlust.
"Well, Terry, what the Pats need to do here is put points on the
board, while keeping the Rams from doing the same! That's THE KEY
to this ballgame, Terry."
MP -- Yes, but I don't actually have to *watch* any of those
games on the teevee; just a pleasant radio soundtrack for work
(especially when Vin Scully's at the mic).
Though I recall listening to Dick Enberg call Rams games in my
youth, football has always seemed to be a visual sport, and also a
pretty foul-smelling male-bonding ritual....
Twba,
I heard about that before. I wondered, does being thin counteract
the increased hairyness, acne and shrunken breasts that are the
side effects of steroids? Give me a smooth-skinned, breasted fatty
over a Nicole Bass/Chyna clone any day of the week and twice on
Sundays.
Jennifer,
Did you mean to say Bush is going to put the whole ECONOMY into my
toilet sniffin' around?
Mo, I had to google Nicole Bass/Chyna to figure out what you were willing to kick out of bed. That chick, if she is a chick, is big enough to kick me out of bed. She's a man, baby.
Where the hell do nine year old girls get the cash for steroids? Something must be wrong with these polls.
"Terry! Howie! Poopy!"
Ha ha. Made me wonder: What if someone develops a 'roid that is
only detectable by stool sample? Might act as quite a
deterrent.
You know one "sport" where most of the "athletes" actually are on steriods is pro wrestling. Why doesn't the government want to step in there?
Actually, Dave, what I'd like to know is why you put the word "sport" in quotes? You sayin' rasslin's fake?
Dave this could be a part of the answer to your question! http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/16/eveningnews/main681055.shtml
I've said this here before, but I think it bears repeating:
I think those of us who are under forty WILL live to see a time
when all employers are required to drug-test their employees, just
as employers are now required to ensure their employees are either
citizens or green-card holders.
Tangentially related, but my wife and I were at the mall this
weekend, and near the big playground inside the mall (and not
coincidentally, next to the DMV office), there was a booth offering
free fingerprinting of children for parents. I told my wife, "I'll
bet you $100 that within 10 years, more parents than not will have
their kids implanted with some kind of RFID locator chip at birth."
Mark my words. The age of privacy is over.
Phil -
While I certainly have problems with mandatory drug testing
conducted by the govmint on my children, I don't believe they have
a reasonable expectation to privacy invasion from me. I would
therefore have no problem implanting an RFID chip in any of them.
I'd do in a heartbeat. 18th b-day present? Tell em about it.
A large part of the reason both spectator sports and
participation sports became popular in the western world in the
19th century was the Christian belief that "the devil will find
work for idle hands"; in other words, sports were supposed to keep
our kids too busy to find time for sex, drugs, and other forms of
do-it-yourself entertainment.
Guess where your kids will go to find fun, and/or consolation,
after they're kicked out of (or don't dare sign up for)
after-school sports because of drug testing?
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245