Jacob Sullum | March 14, 2005
What is it with Illinois legislators and weird ornamental surgery? First they went after forked tongues. Now it's eye jewelry. Their guiding principle: If thinking about it makes you wince, it ought to be illegal.
[Thanks to Nicolas Martin for the link.]
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|3.14.05 @ 10:19AM|#
I think we need a US constitutional amendment to make sure states don't try and mess with the sanctity of the eye.
|3.14.05 @ 11:06AM|#
Ick!!!
Hey, totally off-topic, but as a future, present or past law school student, I have a sudden urge to help create a blog to provide resources for law students. I sure wish I had an outlet for this sudden urge.
Unfortunately, due to limited time, I won't be able to read any threads older than this one today.
|3.14.05 @ 11:18AM|#
I'm with you, Stevo, just, how do you do it? If only...
SteveInClearwater|3.14.05 @ 1:37PM|#
If pierced Mucus Membranes are outlawed, then only Outlaws will have PMMs.
and don't forget
They'll only get my Ocular Prince Albert if they pry it out of my Cold, Dead Eyeballs.