Jesse Walker | March 8, 2005
Since I mentioned the fracas over the New York Press's witless pope jokes last night, I should add that the editor has been ousted in the wake of the story. More precisely, he was given a two-week suspension and quit.
Editor and Publisher reports that the papal riff was condemned by Mayor Michael Bloomberg: "As disgusting as this is, it's sadly par for the course for this publication." What does Reason have to do to get a powerhouse endorsement like that?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"What does Reason have to do to get a powerhouse endorsement
like that?"
Publish a piece on "The 52 Funniest Things About the Upcoming Death
of Ronald Reagan."
Oh wait, too late.
Koyen defended NYPress content as "always intelligent." I don't think so. It's zany, inflammatory, fringe-culture-oriented, often entertaining, but only occasionally intelligent.
52 Funniest Things About the Upcoming Death of Deep Throat? Unless the Pope really _was_ Deep Throat. Then I guess they kinda beat you to that.
"If you see through the nasty Pope jokes, for instance, you will
see a well-reasoned political argument."
Jesus Christ, if you're gonna make fun of the Pope, have the balls
to make fun of the fucking Pope; don't try to dress it up with this
kind of socially responsible baloney. There was no political
argument at all in that piece-which was the only good thing about
it, because the jokes really sucked ass. I never imagined myself
saying this, but Bring Back Russ Smith!
I seem to remember a light-hearted piece on the Challenger
disaster coming out shortly before the Columbia disaster. What ever
happened to that? It disappeared almost instantly. I'd like to
re-read it because, if I remember correctly, it had something to do
with the healing process. Any chance we can get a look at that
again?
Anyway, if you do, you might just get such an endorsement.
I find it interesting that people seem to be tripping over
themselves to distance themselves from this piece, either by
expressing self-righteous moral outrage or by questioning the
comedic qualities ("this just sucks")
It's just simple shock-comedy, which feeds on ANY attention one is
willing to give it.
This must be the high point of Matt Taibbi's life to date. The man's first goal is to piss people off, and now he's managed to do it on a national scale. The thousands of people telling him he's an asshole will no doubt assure him that he did a proper job of epatering the bourgeois.
cb, that Challenger piece (which was really a look at the many
jokes that came in the wake of the disaster) was by me, and was
published a mere four days before the Columbia disaster. So low had
NASA's share of the public attention span fallen that at the time I
did that piece, I didn't even know there was a space
shuttle up, and thus was as surprised as anybody when another one
blew up. Much as I'd like to get Bloomberg's highest rating, I
disappeared it from the site, but here's a sample:
Recollected in tranquility, Space Shuttle Challenger jokes seem like a high water mark for catastrophe humor. Other examples of tragicomedy from that era are easily scanned for subversive attractions: Kennedy assassination jokes had the obvious virtue of desecrating a sacred memory of the Baby Boomers. (The best of these japes does not translate well into print: The teller promises to do his famous impression of John F. Kennedy, then jerks his head rapidly backward and forward while making a gunshot sound.) Jokes about Rock Hudson simultaneously worked out feelings of homophobia and medical paranoia. Teases about the dismal deaths of Natalie Wood or Philadelphia's own Princess Grace may have played on our general sense that celebrities deserve any bad thing that happens to them.
Challenger jokes may boast similar subtexts. Looking over the best of them now, we can see a variety of anti-feminism at work; many of the gags at Christa McAuliffe's expense are merely updated jokes about women drivers. Less well remembered is the outpouring of one-liners referring to "O-Rings"-an obvious sexual euphemism but also a useful catch-all for all manner of failures, technical glitches, and disappointments.
But catastrophe jokes are usually not notable for being especially funny or insightful. They are remarkable (and I would argue that here Challenger jokes are the models for the entire genre) for the speed with which they were disseminated and for being the most memorable things about the event.
The speedy dissemination cannot be credited to the technology of the times. At the time, jokes about any public tragedy were said to emanate from "Joke Central." (Believers in the legend of Reagan as a small-government conservative should be advised that at the height of his presidency such a command-economy metaphor seemed entirely plausible.) Later variations held that Joke Central was either run by or in close contact with Wall Street traders, whose then-futuristic communications networks explained the seemingly immediate appearance of the jokes throughout the Lower 48. Challenger jokes seemed to arrive while the news was still breaking.
When I say the jokes were the most memorable thing about the tragedy, I intend no disrespect to the crew of the Challenger or their survivors. But it seems so clearly true as to be unavoidable. It's a fairly good bet you could not name four, or three, or even two of the seven Challenger astronauts. But it's for damn sure you know what color Christa McAuliffe's eyes were.
There was no political argument at all in that
piece
Well, buried in the middle was a good jab about "heretofore
anonymous bureaucrat will instantly be celebrated as world's
holiest man as he travels to AIDS-stricken Africa to denounce the
use of condoms". That's sort-of political.
52 Funniest Things About the Upcoming Death of William
Rehnquist.
Go on. You know you want to. I'll kick it off:
52) Four words: Chief Justice Clarence Thomas
17.In his last days, the Pope was in tremendous pain.
Funny to the BTK Killer maybe. Anyone else? I'm with the Satanist
on this piece of crap.
The piece unintentionally proves a lesson for anyone attempting to write humor or satire: First make sure you have the talent to pull it off. I was insulted that it didn't make me laugh at all.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245