Julian Sanchez | February 23, 2005
Chris Leppard, a 23-year-old Brit, suffers from a rare condition that prevents his stomach from properly signaling his brain when he's full. He has, as one might imagine, become quite obese. British authorities decided this made him a danger to himself, and have had him involuntarily committed under laws normally applied to the mentally ill.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
If this catches on in the States, will we see fat people demanding disability benifits?
As far as I understand they already do this. Where do you think
they get the money for those Rascals? Something in my brain tells
me to eat McDonalds twice a week even though I know it is bad for
me to do so. Therefore I am a danger to myself not only from the
unhealthy food but I'm also at risk of losing my mind while waiting
in line for my food that is supposed to be "fast" food while
watching some mouthbreathing teen try to figure out the cash
register.
(If I didn't properly detect the sarcasm in you comment please
disregard this message.)
Be fair, Britain is a small place: the guy just might have all the food on the island.
"Angry Libertarian Alliance spokesman Dr Sean Gabb said: �What
on earth justifies the intervention of the police and compels him
to have medical treatment?�"
Wow. I didn't know there were any libertarians in Britain
anymore.
This story is patently false, since wise H&R regulars have repeatedly informed us that being obese can only come as the result of freely choosing to be a sedentary, Twinkie-devouring lazyass.
Actually, I've always figured that becoming obese was the result of a variety of factors, none of which are any of the government's damned business.
"since wise H&R regulars have repeatedly informed us that
being obese can only come as the result of freely choosing to be a
sedentary, Twinkie-devouring lazyass."
I note that they don't mention his activity level in the story. But
I'm sure that with all that caloric intake he could easily run
10-12 miles/day. But the same brain that fails to tell him that
he's full also fails to tell him to get off his ass and move a
little.
On a different note, wouldn't his stomach explode or wouldn't he
throw up if he was full? Of course, that's probably why he has four
stomachs. :-)
Actually, I've always figured that becoming obese was the
result of a variety of factors, none of which are any of the
government's damned business.
Amen! Sing it, sister!
Oh, I agree, Jennifer -- it isn't any of his government's business. I'm just noting that -- since, as sage assures us, obesity can never be the result of an uncontrollable medical problem -- the story never happened, so there's nothing to worry about. See how easy that is!
East Sussex County Council said �all proper procedures have been
followed� � and such orders were �in the interests of that person�s
health or safety or to protect other people�.
Thank goodness he's been incarcerated before he sits on somebody,
maybe even some CHILDREN!
I don't mean to pick on the guy but just because his stomach isn't sending the proper signal means he doesn't realize that what he just ate? Poor bastard.
Phil:
"since, as sage assures us, obesity can never be the result of an
uncontrollable medical problem"
Strawman. I would not say "never." But "rarely," is a word I would
use in this case. In fact, the story notes that the condition is
indeed "rare." Hardly justifies an avalanche of obesity
legislation. Or does it?
phil's note is true, mostly, of h+r and many other places.
of course, it takes a lot longer to say "well, excluding the
population hit with some form of illness which makes their weight
gain inevitable or difficult to treat, america's obese population
became so from a number of factors, involving personal choice of
diet, a lack of exercise, time constraints, difficulty in shopping
in areas where fresh produce is more difficult to find and harder
to get to, hereditary factors, body type and childhood eating
patterns."
though, i will not deny the enjoyment derived from asking a fat
taxer about personal income fat taxes or, my personal favorite, a
national exercise quota.
Weird. And Joe was pointing out just yesterday the connection between craziness and obesity among the homeless.
Why can't this guy just take appetite suppressants? Or would
they not work on him with his condition?
Britain, though one of the loveliest and most interesting places on earth, has become frighteningly un-free and statist -- gradually since 1939, then rapidly since 1979 (Thatcher's ascent). British papers' domestic news pages are scary reads.
Not too much straw in that man, sage -- after all, when
presented with an actual medical case, your first instinct is to
ask why he doesn't get off his lazy ass and exercise more. I
shouldn't need to point out that a medical condition that
prevents your body from realizing that it's already full might
cause all sorts of metabolic fuck-uppery if you suddenly start
burning through calories like crazy by running several miles a day,
but I guess I do. If your body thinks it's still hungry when you're
really full, what do you think it will do when it thinks it's
starving?
I agree, in any case, that none of any of this requires any laws,
taxes, policies or involuntary commitments.
How Free Is Britain?
Anthony Daniels answers this question over the "Social Affairs
Unit" blog:
http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000301.php
Phil:
"Not too much straw in that man, sage "
I beg your pardon. You said "I'm just noting that -- since, as sage
assures us, obesity can never be the result of an uncontrollable
medical problem "
Now since that was not even close to anything I said, and since it
makes your arguement that much easier to hit home, that is in fact
a strawman.
But the fact that this guy has a medical problem causing his
obesity is rare indeed, at least IMO. Look at any study you want
and I'll wager that most obesity cases are the result of more
calories taken in than burned each day.
"I agree, in any case, that none of any of this requires any laws,
taxes, policies or involuntary commitments."
Well at least we agree on that. Peace.
Help Me! Help Me! Send the government quickly to help me.
I read all the Hit&Run blog items and all the comments and my
brain doesn't know when I've had enough.
It could be worse, I suppose. Just imagine the horror of being
addicted Salon or Slate.
Is there a Happy Libertarian Alliance, too? -
aaron
A Silly L.A. might be more fun.
Kevin
If the British government continues to violate the freedom of its citizens in this manner then I see no option short of invasion! ;)
"He's since been released and he intends to sue."
I hope he can find, in that Nanny State, a barrister who can
stomach a case like his.
If the British government continues to violate the freedom of
its citizens in this manner then I see no option short of invasion!
;)
If you could it would be appricated :D (as long as bush isnt in
charge (shudders))
British Libertarian
When we come we'll burn down the Parliament and No 10 Downing
Street to even the score. :)
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245