Tim Cavanaugh | February 8, 2005
Reader Bonnie Pettis alerts us to this Fox News story about curriculum guidelines in the Newton, Mass. public school system. Benchmarks issued in 1999 to encourage "Respect for Human Differences" promote "Newton's commitment to active anti-racist education" through various suggested activities:
Students will: Consistently analyze their experiences and the curriculum for bias and discrimination; Take effective anti-bias action when bias or discrimination is identified; Work with people of different backgrounds and tell how the experience affected them; Demonstrate how their membership in different groups has advantages and disadvantages that affect how they see the world and the way they are perceived by others...
Part of the new Social Studies program? A more enlightened Civics curriculum? No, these are benchmarks for Newton's math classes.
The guidelines have shown striking results. According to a local columnist who published the guidelines, Newton's math test results have declined steadily over the past three years, to the point where 32 percent of sixth-graders are now getting D-plus scores or worse (or, in non-prejudicial language, 68 percent of the students are passing).
Here's a math question I never figured out in public school: How come a D is considered a flunking grade? What's the purpose of F if D has all the same effects as a failure?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I've never seen the point of the D either. I'm all for sorting
out varying degrees of talent or lack thereof, but since I don't
believe that classroom tests and assignments are the
best indicators of merit (don't get me wrong,
they're good for sorting people into basic categories, but the fine
distinctions can only be ascertained by performance in jobs, or at
least applied research projects), I think we should have just 4
grades:
Satisfactory/Pass
Fail
Barely passing
Pass with distinction
I'm not so sure that two people whose scores differ by a few
percent are really all that different (the only way to be sure is
to observe them in the real world), but I'm pretty sure that a 20%
difference is telling us something.
I never got why we use 'F' anyway. OK it stand for failing. But why blow the alphabetical system of ABCD? Only once have I seen a school that used a more sensible 'E' for a failing grade.
OK it stand*s* for failing.
Some linguist I am! Sorry, slight agreement problem there.
The reason you all don't understand "D's" is because you don't
understand how our politically-driven education system works. I
work as a public high school math teacher, so I can enlighten you
why "D's" exist and why they are basically the same as "F's"
Parents don't like it when their little clones bring home "F's"
Since their brilliant progeny could not possibly have failed
without help, it must be the teacher's fault. So these parents, who
up till now have had NOTHING to do with their child's education,
pick up the phone and complain loudy to anyone who will
listen.
Principals and administrators don't like "F's" because they have to
deal with the aforementioned indignant parents. Additionally,
failing grades reflect badly on the school's performance, and thus
their own personal performance.
School boards don't like "F's" either. When a student gets and "F,"
he or she can not recieve credit towards graduation for the course
and must retake it. This potentially results in the student
spending more time in school, which costs additional money and
strains the school system's already maxed-out capacity. If that
wasn't bad enough, parents are also voters, and since most school
boards are elected, the school board members tend to get riled when
the parents are upset.
And thus the shit rolls downhill to the teacher. Teachers are put
under enormous pressure not to fail students for all of the
abovementioned reasons. A teacher who gives out too many "F's"
catches serious heat from the school administration. Some schools
actually have a policy forbidding teachers to fail a student in the
same course twice.
If this pressure wasn't enough, teachers have their own reasons for
passing on failing students. Failing students are often disruptive,
ill-behaved students. School curriculum has been dumbed-down so
much over the last 20 years that even a complete knucklehead can
pull a "C" if he tries. The kids who fail usually do so because of
a lack of work ethic, high absenteeism, and out of school
suspensions resulting from discipline problems.
So the end result is that most "F's" are changed to "D's" in order
the pass the student along through the system. The "D" is "the new
F." A "D" doesn't mean "below average" anymore. It means "get this
little bastard out of my face and the administration off of my
ass."
So now you know.
What's the purpose of F if D has all the same effects as a
failure?
It's a cynical device to show smart students that school is mostly
bullshit.
Matt, that explanation presumes that a D is considered "passing." It's not. With a D you get no credit, so you still have to repeat the class. There's no functional difference between a D and an F as far as I can tell.
The 'D' is also used by vindictive teachers who just plain don't
like a student, but who can't justify failing her with an 'F',
because the teacher realizes they would never get away with giving
her an 'F' just because they don't like that particular student,
her writing style, or her ideas. (In regards to non-scientific
classes).
This is especially true of the increasingly arbitrary grading
pattern of modern-day college liberal arts professors -- especially
the ones who know you have little or no interest in their subject
of teaching.
In a college major at many undergraduate schools, a D has the same
effect as an F - failing.
Tim, that's College. Most High schools still give graduation credit for a D. As long as the student doesn't have any illusions of taking the next level of the course it doesn't usually matter.
"D" is for "Dolt", "F" is for "Fuckwit".
A subtle but significant distinction.
D or F - Fail
C - Barely passing
B - Satisfactory/Pass
A - Pass with distinction
In other words, thoreau, pretty much what we do now.
where I went to college you had to get a "c" or better to pass the required math courses, a passing, but "d" grade would not count, effective making a "d" an "f", but for the lesser effect on your GPA. No other departements did this that I was aware of. Damn math anyway, it belongs in hell....
Tim,
Not that I'm an expert, but my wife is a teacher in New York State
and I'm pretty sure there is a clear difference between D and F.
I'm curious what system you are referring to.
Matt's comments were dead on.
Even if D and F are both failing grades (not always true), there's a GPA difference. In the 4.0 system, D is 1.0 and F is 0.0. That can make a difference when a student has to maintain a particular average for certain purposes (such as athletic eligibility, maintenance of a scholarship (!), etc.). Where I teach, students are supposed to maintain a 2.0 average to remain "in good standing." They'll supposedly get kicked out if their GPA stays below 2.0 for too long.
RC Dean-
True, but we also have the + and - grades. Also, even though the
letter grades more or less have the meanings that you said, the B
still has the aura of being a "good" grade rather than just
satisfactory. I'd rather ditch the grades and their frequently
outdated connotations and go to labels with unambiguous
meanings.
Tim-
Whether or not a D counts all depends on the school. I seem to
recall that at my college a D would get you units of credit so you
could meet the 128 credit graduation requirement, but if the class
was a core requirement then you'd still have to repeat it with a C-
or better to meet the subject requirement for your major.
So, if you got a D in some electives or GE's you were OK. But if
you got a D in a core class you were in trouble. Or something like
that. Point is, different schools treat the D differently.
Tim,
I don't know how things work where you live, but here in Florida
you get credit for a "D." I'll quote from Florida statute
242.2463:
Grade "D" equals 60 percent through 69 percent, has a grade point
average value of 1, and is defined as "lowest acceptable
progress."
Notice the "acceptable" part.
The legislature has changed the graduation requirements so that a
student now needs a 2.0 cummulative GPA to graduate, so a kid can't
get all "D's" and graduate. However, it is entirely possible for a
student to fail every math and english course they take, get handed
a bunch of "administrative D's," and make up the GPA with "A's"
with easy elective courses.
Yes, things really are that screwed up.
Two quick thoughts:
1. All of the comments at this point are about the last two
sentences of Tim's post (i.e., what's a "D" and what's an "F")
rather than the paragraphs before. Is it that the topic so absurd
that it speaks for itself or that we're running short on ten-foot
poles?
2. The columnist for the Tab lists school administrators' salaries;
is that common practice in local papers?
Matt Medlin at February 8, 2005 02:43 PM
So now you know.
enlightening in a frightening kinda', sorta' way.
I think absurdity wins out.
I'm not sure if it is common practice, but since the "public" pays
their salaries I wouldn't find harm in it.
Tim Cavanaugh,
A "D" is a passing grade at some universities.
The program itself sounds rather screwy.
JLo,
Articles that point out the absurd level of political correctness
in public schools are simply passe. We are all numb to them
now.
"What they do know about is the wonders of Ghana, Mexico and
China," [Lillian Benson, whose children...attend the district's
schools] said.
If only that were true there might be hope. The trouble is they
don't even know that.
As someone who graduated from the Newton, MA school system in
1985, all I have to say is things have changed a hell of a lot in
old Barney Frank's district.
The worst thing I can remember is a teacher who didn't know the
difference between archeology and paleontology.
Only once have I seen a school that used a more sensible 'E'
for a failing grade.
My elementary school used the 'E' as well, and so did the other
schools in our system. I may be remembering this wrong, but I think
my mom (who taught LD kids for a spell) told me that this was
because some administrator thought it stigmatized kids to give them
a grade that stood for 'Failure.'
My university used to have an E grade. It stood for a conditional Fail. Basically you fail the class if you don't pass a test on the 5th week of the next term, you don't get credit. As such there was a 5 point GPA scale. They got rid of it because people would be slacking off mid-semester to pass the test. Now all that remains is a 5 point GPA scale that punishes Fs more.
How about the difference between "archeology" and "archaeology." Did they teach you that in school, too?
My schools (in Rochester) all had "E" not "F". Hence, I always thought "ABCD-F" was really dumb, too. And there was a clear difference between "D" and "E". "D" was "below average", but passing. "E" was "failing". Simple, eh?
I know this would horrify today's educationis babblers, but in
my grammar and high-school career, we didn't receive letter grades.
We got numbers. An excellent 4rd grade report card might
look like this:
English....91%
Geography..94%
Science....96%
Religion...92%*
Math.......91%
etc.
I seem to remember letter codes for attendance, deportment and
effort, also.
Our high school GPAs were computed by awarding points for a numeric
range, with an extra point for taking advanced classes. (A
sophomore taking geometry earns 4 points with a 92% (A in
letter-speak.) A freshman taking the same course and achieving the
same grade would be awarded 5 points.
I can remember 65% being the standard for failure, and in a pure,
Bart Simpson "Behold, my F!" manner, the teachers would inscribe it
in red ink. Anyone doing "D" work - 66-75% - would get a warning
mid-year that they were in danger of failing, in writing if not at
a teacher/parent conference. Of course, parents signing the report
card was a requirement, so nobody could claim that they were
ignorant of their child's plight.
As for Newton, this "matrh as social studies" nonsense has been
around for some time. I have no objection to multicultural inputs
to an elementary school math class, as long as it is really
amth-related. We learned that the "Arabic" numerals originated in
India, and how the West's favorite computational system, Roman
numerals, were inferior for doing accurate arithmatic. Bring in the
abacus, and even chisanbop. If it helps teach math, good. If its
just more Blobbish propaganda, ditch it.
Kevin
*Yes, you might have guessed these were private schools run by
religious institutions. They used horrible tactics, such as my 9th
grade algebra teacher, Sr. Stephen, who "drilled and killed" me
from "C" work to a 100% score on the New York State Regents algebra
exam at year's end.
My brother, a high school science teacher in Ohio, passes everyone in order to avoid angry parents and administrators. He isn't allowed to flunk more than a small percentage. He has to explain every F grade to the administration. A HS diploma is worthless. Matt Medlin is too correct.
We got numbers in high school, too. For GPA purposes, 90-100 was
4.0(A), 80-89 was 3.0(B), 70-79 was 2.0(C), and below 70 was
0.0(F). They dropped D's, but stuck with the 4 point system.
Advanced Honors classes were worth 5,4,3,0, and truly remedial
classes were worth 3,2,1,0. (I had a 5.0 one semester, to give a
feel for how generous they were with the honors designation. I
think the Valedictorian had something like a 4.4 GPA.)
This was a public school - magnet, but that didn't affect the
grading system, the regular programs used it, too. (Magnet school -
take all the talented kids and talented teachers, bus them to a
failing inner city school building, and give them an education
almost as good as they might get in private school while using
their grades and SATs to make the sucky inner city school look good
even though the only time the regular and magnet students see each
other is in art, health, and passing periods.)
"How about the difference between "archeology" and
"archaeology." Did they teach you that in school, too?"
Both spellings are acceptable.
My brother, a high school science teacher in Ohio, passes
everyone in order to avoid angry parents and
administrators.
Twba, you must be referring to my high school physics teacher. Og
bless him.
My brother does teach physics.
Twba, we should talk. I wasn't kidding about that comment. Does he
fly planes for a hobby? Is his wife a teacher also? If you don't
want to disclose info about him, I understand, but I must say that
I am curious....
If you don't want to disclose info about him, I understand,
but I must say that I am curious....
Especially since if it is the same person, then he could rightly
verify that I totally blow at physics.
Smacky,
Geoff is a tall dork married to another teacher. I don't think he
flies planes.
Twba,
Oh. I don't recall having any instructors named Geoff. But it's
nice to know that there is more than one merciful physics
instructor out there. (Well, "nice" as long as none of the kids he
incorrectly passes don't go on to become shoddy radiologists or
nuclear scientists or the like.)
:p
smacky--
they go on to become whiny college freshmen who show up in their
physics instructor's office saying "I don't understand why I'm
failing. I did great in physics in high school!"
Hmm I always thought it went like this:
D is for "Done."
F is for "Free books next semester."
DON'T YOU ALL GET IT, D&F DO NOT MATTER ANYMORE.UNDER NCLB EVEN IF EVERY CHILD GETS 100% ON THEIR "MANDATED" READING,MATH ETC. TESTS AND MORE THAN 5% OF THE CLASS IS SICK OR ABSENT THE CLASS FAILS. I KNOW, IT HAPPENED AT MY DAUGHTERS FINE PUBLIC INSTITUTION.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245