Nick Gillespie | February 3, 2005
Here's the full text of Bush's State of the Union speech.
And here's the Democrats' response.
Last year, I did a super-condensed version of the SOTU.
This year, I was/am too tired. Though I'll note two strange things:
1. For all the talk about Social Security reform, etc., Bush spent a fair amount of time talking about hardcore social conservative issues, including opposition to gay marriage and abortion. Yet this time around, those things went largely uncommented upon by pundits after the fact. Not sure what that means (probably nothing), but I thought it interesting.
2. Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the head of the Senate Democrats, burned a fair amount of time recounting one of the fakest aw-shucks anecdotes heard in recent times, the verbal equivalent of a $3 bill:
A few weeks ago, I joined some friends of mine for a bite to eat at The Nugget--Searchlight's only restaurant [Searchlight, Nevada is Reid's hometown]. We were sitting down in a booth, when a young boy, about 10 years old, named Devon walked up to us.
Carrying a skateboard under his arm, he said, "Senator Reid, when I grow up I want to be just like you."
Well, the truth is Devon could probably do a lot better. But the point still holds and it is this: No one ever had to tell young Devon to dream big dreams, no one ever had to teach him that America is a place of possibility.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
No one ever had to tell young Devon to dream big dreams, no
one ever had to teach him that America is a place of
possibility.
Yeah, nobody has to teach kids to have big dreams, or that America
is supposedly the "place of possibility". This much is evident from
various popculture TV shows trumpeting the rich supastahz' opulent
lifestyle.
No, what must be taught, or better, learned, is that your
boundless childhood dreams shall be tempered by an extremely
oppressive State. When you're a kid, you think, I'm gonna start a
company and make alot of money be very successful---but you have no
idea that the State will regulate your every move and steal half
your wealth. This is a painful lesson that stings the most that
first year out of college, when you're doing your own taxes, and
you see just how much the government takes from you.
You can dream big dreams, and no, that doesn't have to be "taught",
Senator. But what we don't teach our kids is that their dreams will
soon clash with an omnipotent juggernaut that cares nothing for
those dreams. No, the monster cares only for its own survival and
propegation. It's too bad we don't have a course in high school
called "how the government will crush your freedom". I sure could
have used something like that when I was a kid.
Nick Gillespie,
I suspect its because everyone realizes that a federal
constitutional prohibition against same-sex marraige is going
nowhere. Its red meat for the social conservative bigots.
Reid was cloying. I needed to brush my teeth afterwards.
Haven't Washington Democrats ever heard of subtelty? I haved that
same clubbed over the head feeling as when John Kerry "reported for
duty" at the convention.
What is this trend of young children writing to/approaching
politicians?
What the hell are we teaching our kids?
I know the Nugget in beautiful Searchlight. There's nothing like having a bite to eat with the clanging of slot machines in the background. You can look out the windows and follow the progress of the hooker working the truck parking area.
I did a sort of condensed version.
Be warned, though. I don't like this guy and his piece of shit
Administration. Is that adequately disclaimed enough?
On the plus side, the First Lady facing down the East Side Kings in
Austin should be something to behold.
Please enjoy my official summary:
"Hi everyone.
There's been a lot of people voting lately. I like that idea.
My generation is feeling good. Social Security will outlive us. Our
parents are dying, and the free time their inheritance will buy us
means we can buy more pills and think about what laws to pass on
our grandchildren.
Fiscal discipline is important. Here is a long long list of
government programs I will enact and expand. America is a land of
opportunity for Mexi-cans not Mexicannibis. I will spread the
influence of markets for everything but embryos.
Damn it does NOT feel good to be a gangster.
We are working closely with our allies in China, Saudi Arabia and
Pakistan to help stop evil authoritarian regimes.
America has always been on the front line of freedom. Like when we
abolished slavery 30 years after everyone else did.
Told you so about communism. Good bless."
For all the talk about Social Security reform, etc., Bush
spent a fair amount of time talking about hardcore social
conservative issues, including opposition to gay marriage and
abortion.
Eye of the beholder, perhaps? Here's how much time Bush spent on
the issues by my count:
Social security- 9:50
Gay marriage- :41
Stem cells- :53
No mention of abortion outside of the stem cell issue.
Sounded to me like he was just namechecking those social issues for
the base, but isn't going to aggressively pursue them like social
security reform or the energy bill.
We are working closely with our allies in China, Saudi
Arabia and Pakistan to help stop evil authoritarian
regimes.
Chuckle...snort...good one.
Like when we abolished slavery 30 years after everyone else
did.
Actually Brazil abolished slavery in 1888. But aside from that
nitpick great line. (chuckle)
Evan--I know exactly what you mean. I've been working my first
"real world" job out of college for the past year and it took me
months to come to grips with how much I have taken out of each
paycheck. I am suprised people don't automatically become
libertarians after the first time they pay taxes.
On a side note, what kid wants to grow up to be just like a
government flunky? Can't our children look up to someone more
deserving than Senator Reid?
Isaac Bertram,
More nitpicking:
The gradual emancipation of slaves started in Brazil in 1871 (e.g.,
individuals birthed by slaves were born free, etc.).
Cuba did not abolish slavery until 1886.
Anyway, the U.S. was significantly behind the ball on the issue;
most Latin American countries outlawed the practice upon gaining
idependence from Spain (first decades of the 19th century), Britain
having ended slavery (and the apprenticeship program that followed
it) by 1838, France ending slavery in 1848, etc.
Ben
You really want to get bummed. In ten years I get to retire and you
will be one of three workers who will get your payroll tax given to
me.
Now in return you'll get to do the same thing to the next
generation. That is unless in the mean time Congress comes to its
senses and decides that taxing poor kids to give money to rich
geezers is a really, realy shitty idea.
"I suspect its because everyone realizes that a federal
constitutional prohibition against same-sex marraige is going
nowhere."
This morning, I saw Pat Robertson interviewing Frum on the 700 Club
(or whatever they're calling it now)--somebody has to keep an eye
on the enemy--and both of them seemed to agree with Gunnels.
...on this issue anyway.
Let's just call it what it is: Social Security is a government
run pyramid scheme.
As for that kid wanting to grow up to be a Senator (forgot about
"like you Mr. Reid" - ick), he needs some serious psychological
help.
What ever happened to dreaming of being a cop or fireman? Next
thing you know, these kids will want to be high-priced lawyers.
Gary
I could nitpick more by pointing out that several US
states (eg PA - 1780, MA - 1783) abolished slavery very
early in that timeline.
Treating the US as a unitary state (which many people, esp.
foreigners, do) creates many problems in overlooking many of the
liberal impulses that arose in the States (eg abolition of
capital punishment in MI, 1845) and were exported to Europe (much
to the consternation of those in the traditional power
structure).
Of course, enshrining slavery in the COTUS and the Fugitive Slave
Act, effectively maintained slavery as a national institution, so
one ought not to be that sanguine.
The corollary of the verse "the sins of the fathers..." is of
course "the children shall not be rewarded for the virtues of the
fathers".
But I shouldn't go on because I don't want to spoil Pavel's joke,
because it was really good.
I love H&R.
You never know when an errant quip will get you either ignored or
enlightened as to the historical progression of New World
abolishionism.
The whole Egypt thing caught me off guard in the speech. They just signed a big trade agreement with the US and Israel (!) and the economy is opening up. There's a good article in the WSJ on the new PM and the reforms he's instituting. I was impressed at the liberalization of the economy since my previous visit. The government is still pretty authoritarian and brutal, but it's an improvement.
Isaac Bertram,
I could nitpick more by pointing out that several US states (eg
PA - 1780, MA - 1783) abolished slavery very early in that
timeline.
Don't forget Vermont; it abolished slavery in 1777 (its
constitution is considered by some EAR scholars to be the most
radical of the original thirteen states) - of course it was
rebelling against the state of New York at the same time it was
rebelling against the British crown, so there's the technical
question of whether one considers it a state in 1777 or 1791. Its
ban was also outright, whereas most of the northern states that
banned slavery did so gradually.
Treating the US as a unitary state (which many people, esp.
foreigners, do) creates many problems in overlooking many of the
liberal impulses that arose in the States (eg abolition of capital
punishment in MI, 1845) and were exported to Europe (much to the
consternation of those in the traditional power
structure).
Well, I don't believe I was doing that (any more than you guys were
at least).
"Saudi women are still enslaved."
And the "guest workers" the Saudis bring in from other parts of
Asia often don't fare much better than the indentured servants of
another age.
I don't know that it's fair to compare enclaves where slavery
was abolished (Vermont) to nation-state wide emancipation (Britain,
later US).
It should also be pointed out that abolitionism in the northeast
was about as much an exercise in moral courage as lifting a ban on
negroes in the NHL.
As Britain abolished slavery, the empire was still profiting much
from the use of slaves in sugar cane harvesting, among other
things.
Seems to me no matter how you slice it America was behind, not in
front of, that particular march to freedom.
Considering the limited opportunities in a tiny near-ghost town like Searchlight, Nevada, maybe the kid really did say such a thing. And he probably meant, "I would like to be able to get out of this freakin' graveyard and fly on jets and have hot young staffer gals running around, and all on the taxpayer's dime, just like you Unca Harry!"
Being Senator Bigshot sounds better than driving down to Laughlin every night to deal blackjack to cheapskate oldsters killing Social Security checks.
When I was Devon's age, I didn't want to be Harry Reid, I wanted
to be Brit Reid. Black Beauty was a sweet ride!
Two or three years later I wanted to be one of those young,
good-looking guys getting elected to Congress who had the windblown
hair and held their sportcoats over their shoulders, shaking hands
with voters, their shirtsleeves rolled up all the while.
Kevin
Well, I don't believe I was doing that (any more than you
guys were at least).
It was more of a general caution. I think you know too much about
the sovereignty of the States, and the diversity within the country
to do that.
Oh, and I would never forget Vermont. If it didn't get so fucking
cold I'd probably live there. I just picked two states I know from
memory.
Oh, Wyoming, Female suffrage (1870). Most histories credit New
Zealand (1893?) with being the first country to give women the
right to vote. Switzerland didn't get around to it til
1971.
P.S. I suspect their participation has contributed to
keeping our Presidents beardless.
Few people realize it's just covert product placement by the
razor/shaver industrial complex.
Isaac Bertram,
We're moving to NC from northern New England.
We've had an exceptionally mild (except for about a week) winter so
far in our little micro-climate. Where we live it was 43 degrees
today. That's blazing hot for this time of the year. Its expected
to stay in the mid-30s to low-40s for at least the next ten days or
so.
Though southern New England has been buried in snow this winter,
we've had relatively little. If it continues this way expect lots
of forest fires.
Pavel
Seems to me no matter how you slice it America was behind, not
in front of, that particular march to freedom.
Taken as a whole that would seem to be true. There's also a great
deal to be said for those countries that were able to accomplish it
without exploding in civil war.
GG
Where we live it was 43 degrees today.
Sounds downright balmy. :) It wasn't much warmer in Central FL a
few days ago. (It's actually been colder some days).
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245