Jacob Sullum | January 4, 2005
The Miami Herald reports that a Cutler Ridge, Florida, bar owner who is resisting the state's voter-approved smoking ban has met with some success, winning a favorable ruling from an administrative law judge. Apparently the legislators who wrote the ban were clear that they didn't want any smoking but failed to specify what bar and restaurant owners were required to do about it. My favorite part:
On July 9, Florida Alcohol Beverage and Tobacco agent Jorge Fernandez walked into Pace's bar and saw people smoking. He told manager Lisa Tyrell, who got Pace on the phone with the agent. Pace received a warning that day and asked Fernandez to tell him when he would be back so he could "make sure he had patrons smoking inside his business," according to case documents filed by the state.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
is jorge chaneling claude raines again?
seriously: i don't do well with smoke, but gimme a freakin' break.
i don't like bars that are too loud, either, but you don't see
people in the defense of hearing out there (or we've grown deaf to
their calls, much as we no longer hear the trees scream in
pain)
but we're more-or-less grownups here. we know smoking is bad. being
around smoke bothers some, not others. sit in the freakin no
smoking section, have another beer, and shut the fuck up.
sheesh.
"what are you going to do? arrest me for smoking?"
"yes". smack smack. leash leash. wires. gitmo. doggie doggie.
lydie.
I think it's telling to take a look at non-smoking
establishments in areas that still allow smoking.
There are so few that they don't matter.
Incidentally, Philadelphia's mayor is attempting to ban smoking in
public this year. During his time off from avoiding FBI
investigations, that is.
drf just can't quite shake his fascination with Lynndie Englund,
leashes, and hoods, can he?
Hey, its a free country. Whatever jiggles your handle.
Restaurant smoking bans are an abomination, but I don't know that
any of them impose penalties on the smoker.
that's right, RC, you old ham you.
you know, you get the vizzini award for today.
congragulations.
it all started when a cheezhead with no ability to analyze
conflicting views to said cheezhead's narrow, suffocating over
zealotry lectured me on the virtues of traffic lights.
it's been downhill ever since.
and my usual comment to those who approve of torture apply to you,
too.
vizzini award?
Does this have anything to with a land war in Asia or a contest
against a Sicilian when death is on the line?
There was some question as to whether the beggar or his minkey was breaking the law... So I let them of with a warning.
hey pint:
yup. and how his intellect makes plato et al seem like morons
(paraphrase).
and warren, you said, "minkey"
I often wonder if this blog were a picnic, would a soccer game break out a la the Flying Circus pitting the Greeks against the Germans.
There are so few that they don't matter.
Wrong. It matters very much to the state. Defiance cannot be
tolerated. It's a power thing.
Wrong. It matters very much to the state. Defiance cannot be
tolerated. It's a power thing
The state is concerned with non-smoking bars where smoking is
allowed?
Italy has banned smoking in bars and restaurants:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6759566/
Pretty soon, the only place you will be able to legally smoke in
public in Europe will be that bastion of liberty, France. :)
On a side note, it's interesting how a key component of that
article is "No Drop", as in, many restaurants have seen no drop in
customers since the ban went into effect. This is always how
attacks on liberty are viewed, as if, unless it really screws up
your profit margin, then, it's a-oh-fucking-k. That's the litmus
test. Not whether it's an abomination to liberty, freedom, personal
responsibility, and everything else this country is built upon. No,
what does THAT shit matter? If we can rob people of their liberty,
but not cause too many ripples in the foot traffic counts, then why
not?
No principles, only pragmatics. Sad.
The state is concerned with non-smoking bars where smoking
is allowed?
Absolutely. Don't get me wrong, it may not take top priority. Like
everyone else, government chooses its battles. But once a law is
written, they will not allow open defiance. At least not enough to
provide threat. This is a key element of all the "self-enforcement"
and "exemptions" contained in bans. Larger businesses tend to
follow law without question. Smaller ones sneak by until they make
the news, then the screws get tightened. Together, these effects
allow the bans to take hold without generating defiance sufficient
to threaten the state's power.
But to allow even one bar to openly defy the ban would be a threat.
One that must be countered to prevent other bars from following the
lead.
"Italy has banned smoking in bars and restaurants:"
I sure this will be as scrupulously observed as the tax laws.
:)
Two things.
I got the new The Onion calendar for 2005. The first
article on there is "Only place left to smoke is a room in Iowa."
If you can find it on the net...it is great.
Secondly, my wife and I disagree on this whole smoking ban thing. I
live in Florida and despise the smoking laws. She just rolls her
eyes when we have guests from out of state who try to ask for
non-smoking section in a restaurant...becuase she knows I am going
to go on my tirade.
What I would like to see...is that since government can force a
private establishment to not allow a certain type of behavior in
their restaurant...how come they can't force all restaurants to
provide us all with after dinner mints too. haven't you noticed how
restaurants these days have moved away from providing free mints at
the door or with your check? I think this is a SERIOUS problem that
needs to be explored.
Maybe drf misspelled The Vezina Trophy - for letting the least
get by you on the net?
http://nhl.com/hockeyu/history/trophies/vezina.html
A cheesehead gave drf grief about a traffic light? Don't all
Wisconsinites do that when FIBs cross the border? :)
Kevin
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245