Julian Sanchez | December 31, 2004
The Justice Department takes a step in the direction of the civilized world by expanding its definition of torture, which (one hopes) may reduce the frequency of "fraternity pranks" of the sort complained about by FBI agents in these documents. The full memo is here (PDF). Note that it backs away from, but does not explicitly repudiate, the previous assertion that the president may, at his discretion, suspend treaty-based proscriptions on torture.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
It's war. If we need to use certain methods to obtain
information that will shorten the war, save lives and generally be
in the best interest of troops/civilians then there should be no
limits.
Now, keep this mind, the most gruesome forms of torture are not
effective at retrieving information. This has been proven over
time. The really sicko stuff that the pacifists are pictureing as
they read this post are not the kind of methods employed for
retrieving information.
It is war. Another proven little facet of human nature, and not
just American human nature, is that if it is perceived that the
prisoner is going to be too much of a burden, the typical foot
soldier is more likely to give no quarter. It's easier to just kill
them outright.
Darth Vader using the Force to crush the throat of his enemy to get the where abouts of one rebel stronghold is not torture. He isn't even touching the guy, for christ sakes! Besides, its war.
I note for the record that Lord Vader's technique failed to help
him conjure up the stolen data tapes or find the rebels' hidden
fortress. And I think his gloved hand around the throat of the
recalcitrant rebel scum was close enough to constitute
"touching".
I wonder if Jedi mind-control techniques are constitutional?
This is the funniest torture-related thread I've seen!
If Lynndie England starts rolling up her hair like a pair of
headphones I'll be worried.
"If we need to use certain methods to obtain information that
will shorten the war, save lives and generally be in the best
interest of troops/civilians then there should be no limits."
This was an unnecessary war to begin with. And who decides on whom
we should use these "any methods"? Should we use them on every
single arab male we meet? Should we round them all up and hang them
by their balls till they give us the goodies?
If you catch Osama or Zarqawi then, ok, but your argument ignores
the fact that our methods have probably aroused more emnity towards
the US and will end more lives then lives we'll save from the
utilization of your methods.
But hey, it's WAR, man! Why bother thinking about any of that?
Let's kill us some camel-jockeys!
Happy fucking New Year.
This wouldn't have anything to do with Gonzales' upcoming
confirmation hearing, would it?
...NoOOOooo, of course not!
P.S. I love it when burger-eating attack monkeys defend the use of
torture. Even if everyone else forgets what they said, in the back
of their heads, they'll always know they did it. I just wish they
would broadcast their support for torture louder and to a wider
audience.
...Tell us again...why is it okay to torture people? Should we
differentiate between terrorists and...? Are we bending the use of
the word "torture" to include...? This is war, isn't it? Tell us
again...
So if a thrill-killer used these techniques on the girl he
grabbed before killing her, would he qualify for the death penalty
because of the aggravating circumstance of "torture?"
Of. Course. He. Would.
joe, would you want to hand down a death sentence to somebody who can suffocate you by using The Force?
Look, asking me what I'd want to happen to somebody in a black
mask who throttled me with the Force is just a way of saying I'm
soft on crime. I'm not soft on crime.
joe S. Dukakis
Crime? What crime? Lord Vader was using legal and approved techniques for wringing out the truth from an unlawful combatant (See Conversations with the Emperor, v. III, p. 1370). That's just like you, Mr. Dukakis, to attack the Empire's legitimate authority to protect us from these rebel terrorists. What's next, a protest about the rezoning of Alderaan?
I find nothing in case law or the Geneva Conventions to suggest that asphyxiation is torture.
Ray:
It's war. If we need to use certain methods to obtain
information that will shorten the war, save lives and generally be
in the best interest of troops/civilians then there should be no
limits.
Of course there should be limits and that limit should be that no
torture what so ever is permitted. You want to allow savagery if
the government can make justification that it was for some cause.
Your utilitarian excuses run counter to the fundamental idea of our
republic, the sanctity of thre individual. A ramification of this
idea is to limit what may be imposed on a small group for the good
of the majority.
Full disclosure: I consider the sentiment of that part of your post
to be so un-American that you might as well be spitting on the
flag. Your post disgusted me.
Everyone remember the Analogies in the SATs?
Torturing a terrorist in a "ticking bomb" scenario : Torturing
prisoners as part of ordindary intelligence operations :: Shooting
enemy soldiers on a battlefield : Shooting POWs
joe,
Even in that scenario, we can't make it legal. I admit that we can
imagine some pretty compelling nightmares but, beside the
transgression against justice that is committed when torture
occurs, there is just too much room for the government to use that
type of a scenario as an excuse. Now, if the president issues an
emergency executive order to torture in this type of scenario and
the ticking bomb turns out to be real, and the victim of the
torture is found to have been able to reveal critical information,
that's one thing. If both of these conditions do not obtain, then
it's impeachment time.
Did Bush authorize any torture in Iraq or Gitmo? If so, he should
be impeached for sure as there's not even the allegation of a
ticking bomb.
Oh yeah, I'm really not down with executive orders
in general. It's like the pres. gets to be King if he really wants
to. What kind of limited government is that?
milla jovovich nude britney spears naked pictures britney spears wallpaper jessica simpson wedding pictures paris hilton pictures jennifer lopez photos britney spears naked pictures nikki cox nude avril lavigne photos britney spears pics new paris hilton videos lindsay lohan nude liv tyler nude brande roderick gallery lindsay lohan naked tyra banks nude jennifer lopez naked lindsay lohan nude nicole richie pictures jenny mccarthy nude reese witherspoon nude amanda bynes nude avril lavigne wallpaper jennifer aniston nude lindsay lohan photos mariah carey nude shirley temple movies meg ryan nude jennifer lopez naked paris hilton porn brande roderick gallery paris hilton video tape carmen electra playboy britney spears poster ashlee simpson photos mariah carey pics pamela anderson videos kate winslet nude charlize theron nude carmen electra videos hilary duff pictures shania twain pictures new paris hilton videos jennifer love hewitt pics vida guerra nude lindsay lohan pictures torrie wilson pics britney spears nude angelina jolie nude heidi klum nude salma hayek nude pamela anderson videos britney spears fake paris hilton video tape torrie wilson playboy ashlee simpson wallpaper paris hilton nude pictures paris hilton sex vida guerra nude jennifer lopez nude elizabeth hurley nude angelina jolie wallpaper jessica alba poster christina ricci nude new paris hilton videos anna nicole smith pics kate winslet nude carmen electra nude pics liv tyler nude liv tyler nude angelina jolie pictures paris hilton sex videos alicia key pictures marilyn monroe pictures victoria silvstedt nude eliza dushku nude maria sharapova nude angelina jolie naked sarah jessica parker nude halle berry pictures paris hilton tape paris hilton videos eliza dushku nude serena williams pics angelina jolie nude jennifer garner nude halle berry nude torrie wilson playboy pics carmen electra wallpaper christina aguilera naked free paris hilton sex tape torrie wilson playboy pics britney spears new videos victoria silvstedt nude serena williams pics christina aguilera wallpaper christina milian pictures christina aguilera dirty christina milian pictures denise richards nude angelina jolie pictures christina aguilera wallpaper britney spears photos kristin kreuk pictures vida guerra nude shannon elizabeth nude sarah jessica parker nude jennifer aniston nude brande roderick gallery christina aguilera nude eva mendes nude hilary duff pictures serena williams pics paris hilton tape hilary duff naked sandra bullock nude shannon elizabeth nude maria sharapova pictures kristin kreuk pictures michelle vieth video gratis jennifer aniston nude carmen electra pics amanda beard pictures lindsay lohan nipple slip
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245