June 18, 2003
Remember Chief Charles Moose? He's the Maryland cop who was the public face of the DC sniper investigation. He quit today so he could write his book about the sniper case (actually, the book's already advertised on Amazon). The resignation ends a standoff with the Montgomery County Ethics Board, which was opposed to the chief's book.
You'd think that the sniper books (Moose's, The Washington Post's, etc.) would not only be out by now, but that they'd already be remaindered. In fact, there's a number of things worth learning about the sniper case. Among them: why investigators thought the threatened public should remain in maximal ignorance, and whether officials now believe this approach may have cost lives. Not to mention that business about a white van.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"violated "bedrock principles" of the county's code of ethical
conduct, which forbids employees from exploiting the prestige of
public office for personal gain."
Written by the same county fathers who retire and immediately go to
work for one of their government contractors.
The DC police had one or two witnesses who spotted a dark
Caprice driving away from the DC shooting with its lights off.
Somehow, either the DC cops or Moose's team fscked up and instead
it was White Van Fever.
As for Moose, I've got a couple quotes and news about their racial
discrimination lawsuit against Marriott Hotels here.
It includes a classic: "Hotel security asked to see his key, as
is standard practice, and his reply was, 'Don't you know
who I am? I'm Chief Moose!'" he said.
And, for you historians of the blogosphere, Jim Henley of
highclearing.com coined the phrase "a pack, not a herd" in response
to the public being kept in the dark.
Also, have those surveillance drones which were deployed to catch
the sniper ever been recalled?
Salary for Chief of Police: $80,000/yr
Cashing in on a book deal: $5,000,000.00
(Which would you pick?)
With many of the facts now in, the local law enforcement people,
so universally praised during the process, seem fairly incompetant
in retrospect.
The secrecy, the misdirection, the seeming to dance to the shooters
tune (as confused as it was). If Malvo had just been a psycho and
not an idiot as well (leaving notes, calling the police repeatedly
to provide them clues) he might still be out there shooting.
"violated "bedrock principles" of the county's code of ethical
conduct, which forbids employees from exploiting the prestige of
public office for personal gain."
The irony of this statement is so overwhelming, I may vomit.
The speaker, Doug Duncan, is an authoritarian leftist who, last
year, essentially tried to ban smoking in Montgomery County. He has
currently tabled an initiative to ban all smoking in public places,
a la Nurse Bloomberg. Neither measure has much chance of passing,
but like the book controversy with Moose, it raises Duncan's
profile statewide.
Surely, it's mere ironic coincidence, that Duncan is also presently
using his County Executive position as a bully pulpit to deliver
Paul Begala-style stump speeches here and there around Maryland, in
preparation for the next gubernortorial campaign.
Duncan would consider this using the public office for private
gain, I'm sure, but Duncan probably considers anything that keeps
him in public office to be of benefit to the public...
I read somewhere recently that his salary is actually
$160,000.
The only problem with Chief Moose in this episode as I see it is
that he jumped the gun a little. The traditional etiquette about
making money from public service is, you do the job, you quit, then
you go out and make your pile. It seems like he was trying to have
it both ways.
Moose's salary was about $160,000, the highest in the DC Metro
area, and a revelation to those who read of it in the paper. Who
knew it was that high? And $160K is high - higher than a Senator,
Congressman or Cabinet member.
Moose was NEVER told not to write his book. He was simply told that
he couldn't profit from it. Freedom of speech never entered into
it. He wanted to treat the sniper episode as though he'd won the
lottery -- i.e., look what came his way via his position -- rather
than as something he could help other deal with by sharing what
worked IN HIS JOB. He wanted to cash in, not to help others. And
now he's gone -- good riddance.
When Chief Charles Moose publishes his book, I hope he will dispassionately comment how during the sniper investigation, his force repeatedly "dropped the ball" and "failed to connect the dots." More importantly, in the interests of full disclosure and public education, there really should be some sort of public inquiry into "what went wrong." Unfortunately, few police departments want to be subject to this kind of scrutiny. I also highly doubt that Moose was really in control of the investigation. More likely, those working quietly behind the scenes, thought he would be more useful if he were primarily a spokesperson. The sniper investigation reveals a greater systemic problem with large modern day police forces, particularly those that have failed to adopt (or properly implement) managerial techniques like Compstat (which includes the simultaneous systematic analysis of crime data and increased of accountability of middle management).
EMAIL: draime2000@yahoo.com
IP: 62.213.67.122
URL: http://www.enlargement-for-penis.com
DATE: 01/27/2004 12:05:31
An unimportant door is never locked.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245