Jesse Walker | April 9, 2003
Some central features of the USA Patriot Act included sunset provisions: If Congress doesn't revisit and reauthorize them at the end of 2005, they'll no longer be law. Now D.C. Republicans, led by Orrin Hatch, are trying to repeal the expiration clauses.
[Via Is That Legal?]
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Freedom, once lost, is rarely regained and oppression, once formalized, is rarely repealed. How many times do we need to learn this lesson?
These items were sold as temporary necessities during a period
of emergency, not as permanent new policy. All the pro-USAPatriot
press pointed to earlier wartime intrusions of civil liberties,
later repealed, as evidence that this act did not, despite
containing long-time wish list items, represent a permanent new
policy.
Gee, I wonder if Jonah Goldberg wrote anything about his dog
today?
I think it was B.Franklin (or maybe it was T.Jefferson?) who wrote, "Those who would sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither."
I might not have it quite right, but if I recall correctly
witholding taxes from paychecks was a temporary war measure which
started in 1944 43?
Um, that temporary measure hasn't ended quite yet. I fear the same
for this Patriot crap. (They way I heard it was that Patriot II
would repeal the sunset provisions. Maybe they figure they can
sneak this in on its own).
Nah, I bet Jonah will write something about squirrels.
I'm not sure the wartime repeals of freedoms where a good idea
even though they were really temporary. Problem is, after every war
we've had the power of the federal government has grown, even if it
recinded the most obvious takings of liberties.
There is a fundamental difference this time, however, that is
really scary and is probably at the same time the reason they are
already talking about repealing the sunset clause. In the case of
conventional wars, it is very clear when the end occurs; somebody
representing one of the governments involved surrenders or
negotiates a truce. Game over. However, in this 'war on terror',
when would we ever consider it won? There is no obvious victory or
end and we can never be totally safe, ever. This is a very serious
logical problem with concepts about 'temporary' government powers
in this context and should be getting a lot more attention in the
press than it does.
This is serious! Time for us to phone and email our reps and
senators and tell them not to repeal
the sunset provisions of the Patriot act and not to pass the
Kyl-Schumer measure. Our freedom may
well depend on our fighting back. These restrictions could be used
against legitimate dissent. If history is a guide they most
likley
will be. Even if you trust Bush think about a Nixon or a Clinton
with these powers. The ideas of liberty are fun to debate but
sometimes the preservation of liberty requires action. Also
lets
post in other places and call talk radio. Fight back friends of
freedom! Make our voice heard!
The election of 2004 is coming (if not pre-empted by another
warlike adventure). Are you going to vote for anyone who supports
the PATRIOT Act (or Son of PATRIOT), or who thinks that repeal of
the sunset clauses is a good idea? Are you going to vote for anyone
who says that he or she thinks it is OK to send our military to
foreign lands in order to "liberate" them in undeclared wars? Are
you going to vote for anyone who supports a faux-war, such as the
War on Terrorism or the War on Drugs, which isn't a declared war,
has no definite ending, and which requires you to give up more and
more of your freedoms (and forfeit more and more of your labor and
resources) with each passing day?
If your answers are "no," then it is likely that you won't be
voting for ANYONE with a "D" or "R" by their names. And if you
don't vote for candidates for the two big parties, will you bother
to vote at all?
It is vitally important that you vote this year and next, and that
your votes accurately reflect not your perception of a horserace or
your long-time party affiliation, but your actual wishes for how we
should move forward as a nation. From where I sit, it is time to
toss the authoritarians of all parties and persuasions out onto the
street. In so many ways, they have led us far away from the
sensible path suggested to us by the people who originally fought
and died to make ours a free country. They have broadcast false
visions that, if followed, will lead to our impoverishment, perhaps
even our eventual enslavement. Other nations have gone down that
path, to empire and ultimate dissolution. That story has been told.
Let's write a new and different one. You get to write a piece of
that with your vote in these critical years. Don't waste your
chance.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245