Nick Gillespie | December 30, 2002
Over at the Wall Street Journal's Opinionjournal.com, Francis Fukuyama says what precious few Republicanoid conservatives have been willing to say:
Behind the emphasis on power, sovereignty and self-help, the Bush administration has articulated a not-so-hidden idealist agenda that is encapsulated in the term "regime change."
What's curious about Fukuyama's critical piece, though, is the unconvincing and gratuitous slam at "libertarians like those at the Cato Institute." He lumps them in with Pat Buchanan's isolationist tendencies, as if they haven't spent the past decades articulating the legitimate sort of "globalization" (i.e., increasing worldwide free markets, international trade, and open borders) that Buchanan rails against and that Fukuyama defines as essential to a proper foreign policy. [Link courtesy of Arts & Letters Daily]
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
Mark S.|12.31.02 @ 1:28AM|#
Of course Fukuyama doesn't try to differentiate the isolationism, natives, and (dare I say it) racism of the Pukeananites with the non-interventionism of libertarians. Better to lump us in with the crackpots then have an honest debate on whether it's our meddling in foreign affairs that's the real source of Terrorism and Anti-Americanism rather than just Islamic extremism.