Jacob Sullum from the October 2011 issue
In June, administrators at Big
Bear High School in San Bernardino County, California, ordered a
yearbook recall. The defect that triggered the recall was a photo
from the winter formal in which two students, apparently captured
by accident, can be seen messing around in the background: A
17-year-old boy has his hand up the skirt of a 15-year-old
girl.
Police warned students that if they tried to keep their unexpurgated yearbooks they could be charged with possession of child pornography, a crime punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine. Under California law, it does not matter whether “sexual penetration” actually was occurring when the photo was taken, since pictures of minors “simulating sexual conduct” also count as child pornography.
But it does matter whether a person possessing the yearbook notices what seems to be happening in the background of the picture, since the penalties apply only to someone who “knowingly possesses” child pornography. By explaining why they were recalling the yearbook, school officials made every student who had not taken a close look at the suddenly controversial image subject to arrest. In fact, the school officials themselves were guilty of knowingly possessing child pornography from the moment they collected each returned yearbook until they excised and destroyed the offending photo. Since they did not notice the sexual content until after the yearbook was published and handed out, however, they probably do not have to worry about distribution charges.
By the end of June, the boy in the forbidden photo was being investigated for “sexual penetration of a minor,” which can be a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the circumstances. If convicted, he would have to register as a sex offender.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.