Reason.com
Letters May 2010
More Than Zero
I agreed completely with the main point of Matt Welch’s “More Than Zero” (February), but the example of China as a victim of U.S. tariffs left me cold. I support free markets for free countries, and while no country fully practices free trade, China is a good example of a bad trading partner. China uses slave and prison labor, does not honor intellectual property protected by patents and copyrights, and actively engages in industrial espionage.
China’s population was a victim of crushing poverty due to the policies and actions of its own government for many years. The people are catapulting themselves to prosperity now only because the leadership there is grudgingly moving out of the way. Targeting tires specifically for a punishing tariff may not be the best move, but I don’t mind Barack Obama looking out for U.S. interests overall when trading with a country that we should be reluctant to trust.
Grant Angeny
Bethlehem, PA
The Greatest Business Story Ever Told
Greg Beato states that Bible translators “appeared to undermine the doctrine of the virgin birth” by using “young woman” instead of “virgin” in Isaiah 7:14 (“The Greatest Business Story Ever Told”). Mr. Beato has it backward.
The 52 Anglican bishops who put together the King James Version were illiterate in Hebrew and Aramaic, and so used as their source text the Septuagint, a work written in the Koine dialect of Greek, a language that had one word that meant both “virgin” and “young woman.” When the Greeks came upon the Hebrew word ha-almah (“the young woman”) in Isaiah 7:14, they used the same Greek word that they applied to bítoolah (“virgin”) in the Pentateuch.
The King James mistranslation oversold the “legitimization” of virgin birth. Translations that are accurate do not undermine what the original texts never proved.
David Altschul
Berkeley, CA
The Forfeiture Racket
As a police officer and property room manager at a small Michigan police department, I can heartily agree with Radley Balko’s excellent essay on the forfeiture issue (“The Forfeiture Racket,” February). When we went to a seminar around 1986 on how to seize money, cars, and houses, the instructor heavily emphasized that the presence of drugs was not needed, just cash. When command and our local prosecutor in Clinton County figured out this was a cash cow, officers were encouraged to spend more time looking for drugs—which meant less time for the deadly DUI and reckless drivers.
The last 25 years of police action enforcing drug prohibition has undermined public safety and left a large stain on our professional image. Despite that, money talks and we continue to steal from citizens who deserve better. Please urge your politicians to repeal all drug prohibition laws.
Det. Howard Wooldridge (retired)
Most Popular Stories
- St. Louis Cops Worry That In-Car Cameras 'Are Being Used Against Them' (5.23)
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
- Reason "Hero of Freedom" Larry Flynt's Latest Stunt? Photoshopping a Penis into Mouth of Conservative Pundit S.E. Cupp (5.24)
- Plastic Bag Ban Will Put Los Angeles In Landfill (5.23)
- A Report From Obama’s “Humane” Drug War: “My son screamed for his mother for what seemed like an eternity” (5.20)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Get Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
nfl jerseys|11.4.10 @ 10:42PM|#
vsdf