Katherine Mangu-Ward from the May 2010 issue
In February, President Barack Obama announced that he was putting the kibosh on George W. Bush’s $100 billion Constellation program, which had aimed to get Americans back on the moon by 2020.
Critics of the space program welcomed the move. In recent decades, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has delivered little more than unreliable cost estimates, missed deadlines, and limited scientific payoff—all while keeping an ancient, expensive space shuttle fleet on life support.
Meanwhile, many private options for getting into space are likely to come online in the next year or two, most notably Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic. If the proposed budget survives the legislative process, $6 billion in space funds will be redirected to such private firms.
Obama’s jolt to the space agency’s budget has several hurdles to clear before becoming a reality. Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), whose home state hosts major NASA facilities, offered this analysis at a hearing in February: “When the president says that he’s going to cancel Constellation, I can tell you that to muster the votes and to overcome that, it’s going to be very, very difficult.”
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
nfl jerseys|11.4.10 @ 10:45PM|#
nmrh
Athletic Shoes|8.12.11 @ 5:39AM|#
so perfect