Henry Payne | October 24, 2008

Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
And the "no regulation" came during a period of magically increased regulatory spending!!
Alan Greenspan says that the subprime mess caused the current financial problems. Did Fannie and Freddie also cause it? I was under the impression that a subprime loan was one that didn't qualify for Freddie or Fannie. Shouldn't Greenspan be saying that all mortgage lending is responsible for the mess?
Well it's oversimplified, but that's to be expected. Some genuinely funny elements too. I especially like "Pookums". I give it a C+
Replace Pelosi with the Chairman (former ranking minority
member) of the House Financial Services Committee* and you might
have a winner.
* Is Barney Frank-enstein too obvious?
Lamar,
Fannie & Freddie changed their minds about subprime loans
according to Arnold Kling
(who used to work at Freddie, even):
* Is Barney Frank-enstein too obvious? - J sub D
Mebbe so. I know I have no interest in the sequel, The Bride of
Barney Frank-enstein, introducing Steven L. Gobie.
Kevin
Mebbe so. I know I have no interest in the sequel, The Bride
of Barney Frank-enstein, introducing Steven L. Gobie.
But Abbott and Costello meet Barney Frank-enstein would be a
hoot.
"Abbot and Costello buy this great big old house, see- and they're gonna flip it, and get freakin' rich, you know. But they're down in the basement, and they find the secret passage to the laboratory, and they pull the sheet off the table, and there's this monster, and all hell breaks loose, and it's a fucking riot. I laughed the whole time I was reading the script, I tell ya. Whaddaya say? Can I put ya down for ten million? If you can't come up with the cash up front, I can introduce you to my guy down at the Federal Reserve, who's working at the Stimulus Window, these days. You won't regret it."
No. Fannie and Freddie don't have anything to do with this. It was all deregulation. DEREGULATION, I tell you! Stop looking at me that way!
The Frankenstein analogy is particularly appropriate for Fannie and Freddie. While I'm not a libertarian, I would agree with many here that the worst abuses in the market occur when you create public-private hybrids like Fannie and Freddie.
Nailed it.
justsomerandomfellow,
What's especially bizarre is that they were allowed to make
political donations to its political owners in Congress. It's like
the Pentagon was making donations to the Congresspeople that
control its budget.
Isn't the real problem the house of cards we've created by living beyond our means with credit?
Yes TrickyVic, and that is why we must all be given even more credit to get us out of this.
...create public-private hybrids
The whole point of such monstrosities is to enable the government
to do what it's not supposed to.
It's like the Pentagon was making donations to the
Congresspeople that control its budget.
The Pentagon would never do any such thing. But if
Congresscritters want to play with tanks or other such toys, that
can be arranged.
The whole point of such monstrosities is to enable the
government to do what it's not supposed to.
And to enable private enterprise to do really stupid things they
would never otherwise consider. It's a lot like "reality"
television.
Last time I got one of those "deregulated" home loans my wife and I
signed/initialed/signed that we had initialed a stack of
government-mandated paperwork that was about an inch thick. And
that's here in Texas, where the state, county, and city don't add
any layers.
"I can introduce you to my guy down at the Federal Reserve,
who's working at the Stimulus Window, these days. You won't regret
it."
Stimulus Window! Now THAT'S a Friday Funny. Thanks.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245