Five years after 9/11, how about a design actual human beings
might like?
Todd Seavey from the December 2006 issue
div class="bodytext">
p>
When Mohammed
Atta flew a plane into the World Trade Center five
years ago, he was not only a terrorist striking a blow against
America. He was a former architecture student striking a blow
against modernism, the mid-20th-century style often characterized
by geometric shapes, cold glass and steel, Louis Sullivan’s
minimalist principle that “form follows function,” and Adolf Loos’
more puritanical rule that “ornament is crime.”
span class=
"CRbreakgrafline">
o:p>
/o:p>
/span>
/p>
p>
span class="CRbreakgrafline">We’ll never know if such a thought
crossed Atta’s mind in his final moments, but it wouldn’t have been
the first time terrorists saw modernist architecture as a weird
imperialist imposition. In 1997 Basque separatists threatened to
blow up Frank Gehry’s Spanish branch of the Guggenheim Museum in
Bilboa, which looks something like a giant titanium cabbage. A
variety of traditionalists and leftists have criticized
ostentatious, gaudy-modern sites like the Planet Hollywood
restaurant bombed by Muslim terrorists in Capetown, South Africa,
in 1998. Not all the critics are insane.
o:p>
/o:p>
/span>
/p>
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245