"Own work"/wikimedia"Own work"/wikimediaWhile it is certainly the case that the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) is a more worthy recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize than some other winners such as the European Union, President Barack Obama, and Al Gore, it remains the case that even if the OPCW is successful in overseeing the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons this process will have little to no effect on the brutality of the civil war in Syria or when the conflict will end.

Chemical weapons in Syria are responsible for a small fraction of the total number of casualties in Syria. Most of the people killed and wounded in the civil war have been killed or wounded by what are described as “conventional” weapons.

However, not only will the OPCW make little impact on the war in Syria, but the news that the OPCW had won the Nobel Peace Prize prompted some probably unintended reactions in Syria, with one member of Assad’s ruling party telling the AP that the decision underscores the Assad regime’s “credibility.”

From the National Post:

Fayez Sayegh, a lawmaker and member of Assad’s ruling Baath party, told the AP the award underscores “the credibility” of the Damascus government. He said Syria is “giving an example to countries that have chemical and nuclear weapons.”

NPR has highlighted some of the reactions in Syria to the OPCW winning the Nobel Peace Prize:

"An award for what? They have only been two weeks in Syria and they already got the Nobel? It would have been more honest if (Russian President Vladimir) Putin got the award," said a sarcastic Kadar Sheikhmous, a Syrian activist who left the country and is now in Turkey.

"The award should have gone to the children killed in the August attack on Ghouta," he said in reference to the chemical weapons attack in a suburb of Damascus that left some 1,400 people, many of them children.

More from NPR:

Some Syrians cited the OPCW's short time in the country, though the Nobel committee noted the work the group has done elsewhere. Other Syrians felt the award failed to recognize the more than 100,000 Syrians who have been killed in more than two years of warfare.

Some even interpreted it as a present to President Bashar Assad for agreeing to give up chemical weapons — even though the opposition says it was his regime that used them to deadly effect.

Perhaps not the reaction The Norwegian Nobel Committee was expecting.