Elizabeth Warren Is the Democratic Frontrunner. Everyone's Piling On.
Fellow Democratic candidates took aim over how Warren plans to pay for all the "free" stuff she's promising, her policy in the Middle East, and her thoughts on Trump's Twitter account.
Last night, some Democratic presidential candidates took aim at Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) over war, health care, and how she plans to pay for all of the "free" things she's been promising. Sen. Kamala Harris (Calif.) also got huffy over Warren not joining Harris in demanding that Twitter cancel President Donald Trump's account.
(Andrew Yang still just wants to give everyone $1,000 and New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker seems to just want everyone to get along.)
The three hour debate, put on by CNN and The New York Times, saw Warren facing tough questions and direct criticism from Harris, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (Hawaii), South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, former Rep. Beto O'Rourke (Texas), and even Sen. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.).
The latter three mostly tried prompting or provoking Warren into saying how she would pay for all the programs she's proposing—Medicare for All, universal child care, and tuition-free college, to name a few—and admitting that taxes on most Americans would go up to cover the cost of her plans. But Warren repeatedly dodged direct questions and deflected their concerns.
Watching O'Rourke and Klobuchar (who, as per usual, reminded viewers that she's from the Midwest about 80,000 times) make Warren squirm was sort of fun, but both B-list candidates were plenty bad otherwise. O'Rourke doubled down on a pledge to seize guns. Klobuchar accused Russia of "actually invading our election" in 2016. (O'Rourke did have a good comment on tech companies, saying it's not "the role of a candidate for the presidency to call which companies should be broken up.")
Meanwhile, Harris (who, as usual, reminder viewers she's a former prosecutor about 80,000 times) badgered Warren for not joining her in calling on Twitter to ban Trump. (This has become a running Harris theme.)
Warren's campaign subsequently defined getting out of the Middle East to not really mean that.
Warren campaign aide on the senator's "get out of the Middle East" comment:
"it was a reference to combat troops since we have multiple non-combat bases, in UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, etc. and she did not mean those."
Also pointed me to Warren's tweet https://t.co/SBQZriuR1v
— Alex Ward (@AlexWardVox) October 16, 2019
Pete Buttigieg went after Warren over Medicare for All, saying that his plan—"Medicare for all who want it"—would see that all Americans got health care but still leave people with choice:
Warren replied that "Medicare for all who want it" is really just "Medicare for all who can afford it." That's strange, since the only big difference in Buttigieg's plan is permitting private and health insurance plans to still exist. Any low-income person who wanted to could still opt in to the government-run program. But Warren's model is contingent on forcing everyone to sign up.
Best moments of the debate:
- Julian Castro turning a question on gun violence into a referendum on police brutality.
- Tulsi Gabbard condemning mainstream media's complicity in war-mongering and lazy smears of her.
- Andrew Yang challenging the value of Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I–Vt.) federal jobs guarantee.
Worst moments of the debate: everyone on "Big Tech," social media, data, and antitrust.
Once again, Democrats neatly sidestep the government-fueled problems with big tech: surveillance, cronyism.
— Lucy Steigerwald (@LucyStag) October 16, 2019
The Warren and Yang comments serve as a reminder that the ongoing "Techlash" is bipartisan.
Check out my colleague @MrRBourne's recent paper on tech and antitrust.
— Matthew Feeney (@M_feeney) October 16, 2019
Full transcript of last night's Democratic debate here.
- "A homeless man who pleaded guilty to trafficking cocaine had his case dismissed after the substance turned out to be powdered milk." He said he pleaded guilty because it was the only way to get out of jail.
- Start here for a strange look at a bad study on bots and vaping and Wall Street Journal's peculiar coverage of it:
Over a week ago the Wall Street Journal asked me to comment on the report that occasioned this story. Sadly none of my comments made the cut. But that's ok, I'm happy to repeat what I told WSJ (and more!) on twitter in this thread you're gonna want to readhttps://t.co/B8E9WILc0o
— Amelia Howard (@Amelia_RH) October 15, 2019