Damon W. Root | July 15, 2008
In a gesture of
solidarity with Harlem's many struggling residents, Rep. Charlie
Rangel (D-N.Y.) has announced that he will vacate one of the
four
rent-stabilized apartments he currently maintains in the Lenox
Terrace luxury complex. The unit in question, a one-bedroom costing
Rangel just $630 each month, currently serves as a campaign office,
a cozy arrangement that quite clearly violates city and state
rent-stabilization guidelines (he's holding on to his two-bedroom,
his other one-bedroom, and his studio). But as the New York
Times notes, the immaculately dressed Congressman isn't out of
the woods yet:
While it appears legitimate for Mr. Rangel to have one rent-stabilized apartment for his home, some Congressional ethics experts question whether his acceptance of the additional units, given at the discretion of the landlord and not generally available to the public, violates the House of Representatives' ban on members accepting gifts of more than $100.
Under House ethics rules, a gift is defined as any "gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value." And some suggest that the difference between what Mr. Rangel pays for the second, third and fourth apartments and the market rate could fit that definition.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245