Ronald Bailey | February 1, 2007
Possibly, according to National Wildlife Federation scientist
Doug Inkley. Inkley studied Phil's record for the past century --
the number of times the rotund rodent saw
failed to see his shadow which allegedly predicts an early end to
winter versus the number of times his pudgy silhouette was
obscured visible indicating that winter
will drag on for six more dreary weeks. Inkley
reports that:
He found that in the first 75 years of the 20th century, Phil cast no shadow only four times, which according to folklore meant an early end to winter.
But in just the last 25 years of the century, Phil cast no shadow fully eight times, alerting us that winter was coming to an early end, a six fold increase!
Tomorrow - Groundhog Day - the Intergovernmental Panel Climate will add its views to Phil's as it releases the Policymakers Summary to its Fourth Assessment Report of the scientific basis of climate change.
Thanks lunchstealer for pointing out my confusion about the meaning of seeing and not seeing groundhog shadows.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245