Tim Cavanaugh | April 28, 2006
Is George Clooney dropping hints about what the big job will be
for the gang in Ocean's 13? The star actor and director
has been
touring Chad and Sudan. His trusty sidekick?
Uncle Father Nick Clooney, the erstwhile
American Movie Classics host and brother of singing legend
Rosemary. Clooney is
working both sides of the aisle in an effort to get the United
States to stop the genocide in Darfur.
I like Clooney and I don't want to make the umpteenth cheap shot about Hollywood stars and their political campaigns. I think military intervention in Darfur is a non-starter, and I'm glad about that. But what's the clear categorical distinction between intervening in Iraq (which I think it's fair to say Clooney and many other Darfur hawks opposed) and this one? Why does it always seem like progressives support any intervention that clearly does not advance any American interests? (I don't think invading Iraq advanced our national interests, but people made that case, which you definitely can't in the case of Sudan.)
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245