Julian Sanchez | January 10, 2005
The New
York Times' cover story this morning looks at the small town of
Truro, Massachusetts, where police are seeking to solve a
three-year-old murder by asking for voluntary DNA samples from
every man in town. (Presumed Innocent notwithstanding, they're
figuring semen found on the victim's body points to a male
perpetrator.)
Fine to the extent that it's genuinely voluntary, one supposes, except that the story quotes one officer as saying that police are "trying to find that person who has something to hide," and suggests that those who refuse to provide those "voluntary" samples will find themselves under close scrutiny. My intuition is that this would probably pass muster in court, but it certainly feels like it's brushing up against the boundaries of the Fifth Amendment.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245