Union Jobs vs. Children's Lives: Which side are you on?
Congress has passed a $26 billion aid package that is intended
to save the jobs of thousands of teachers, nurses, and other
public-sector employees. To critics who call the measure a "special
interest" bill, President Barack Obama says , "I suppose
if America's children and the safety of our communities are your
special interest, then it is a special interest bill."
In politics everyone claims to be on the side of the children, but
who really is? Pat DeLorenzo is a parent whose daughter suffers
from epilepsy. Like roughly 10,000 other epileptic schoolchildren
in California, eight-year-old Gianna suffers from the type of
prolonged seizures that, without immediate attention, can result in
brain damage or death. After witnessing the response of teachers
and school nurses to one of his daughter's life-threatening
seizures, Pat DeLorenzo now believes that teachers and nurses care
more about protecting union jobs than saving epileptic
children.
DeLorenzo feared the worst when he receive a call from his daughter's school, informing him that she had suffered a seizure. Gianna survived that day, but DeLorenzo was outraged that school administrators had not given his daughter Diastat, a drug that stops seizures before they do permanent harm and is FDA-approved for use by laypeople. Today many schoolchildren must wait until an ambulance brings them to a hospital before they receive Diastat. That's much too long, says DeLorenzo who supports, SB 1051, a California bill that would allow trained non-medical volunteers to administer Diastat at schools.
Epilepsy advocates like the Epilepsy Foundation and physicians groups like the California Medical Association have lined up to support the bill. Unions representing teachers, nurses, and other public employees have lined up in opposition, claiming the bill would put children in danger. Their solution: hire more school nurses.
"The unions are not on the side of the kids," says DeLorenzo who believes unions are more interested in expanding their ranks than protecting epileptic children.
"It's exactly the opposite," says Gayle McClean, southern
section president of the California School Nurses Organization and
a member of the California Teachers Association. "We care deeply
for children and we want them to receive the most appropriate care
and that means they need a licensed medical person caring for
them."
Sacramento lawmakers sided with unions and have refused to bring
the bill up for a vote. The bill will officially expire on August
31.
"Union Jobs vs. Children's Lives" is written and produced by Ted
Balaker. Field Producers: Paul Detrick and Zach Weissmueller;
Additional Camera: Austin Bragg, Production Associate: Sam
Corcos.
Approximately 7.30 minutes.
Scroll down for HD, iPod, and audio versions of this and all our
videos and subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube
Channel to receive automatic notification when new material
goes live.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
StumbleUpon
Digg
Delicious
Reddit
Google