Sanctuary Cities

'Making Federalism Great Again'—My Forthcoming Texas Law Review Article on the Litigation Generated by Trump's Assault on Sanctuary Cities

My newly posted article explains how the administration's efforts have had the unintended effect of strengthening judicial protection for state autonomy.

|The Volokh Conspiracy |


My forthcoming Texas Law Review article, "Making Federalism Great Again: How the Trump Administration's Attack on Sanctuary Cities Unintentionally Strengthened Judicial Protection for State Autonomy," is now available for download on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

"Sanctuary cities"—jurisdictions that refuse to assist federal government attempts to deport undocumented immigrants—have become a major focus of political conflict over immigration policy. The Trump administration's efforts to punish sanctuary jurisdictions have led to multiple legal battles over constitutional federalism.

The administration's crackdown on sanctuary jurisdictions has helped make federalism great again. It achieved this unintended outcome by generating a series of court decisions protecting state and local governments against federal coercion, and by leading many on the political left to take a more favorable view of judicial enforcement of constitutional limits on federal power.

This is the first academic article to attempt a comprehensive evaluation of the federalism issues at stake in the Trump-era litigation on sanctuary cities. The article assesses the three main sets of sanctuary cases that have arisen during the Trump administration: legal challenges to Trump's January 2017 executive order targeting sanctuary cities, challenges to the Justice Department's July 2017 policy of conditioning federal law enforcement grants on state and local government cooperation with efforts to deport undocumented immigrants, and the administration's lawsuit against California's "sanctuary state" law. So far, at least, all three have led to notable victories for advocates of constitutional limits on federal power.

The sanctuary litigation has also produced a noteworthy reversal of the usual ideological valence of judicial enforcement of federalism, with progressive "blue" jurisdictions relying on legal doctrines traditionally associated with the political right. Whether this helps trigger a more lasting shift in attitudes towards federalism remains to be seen.

New sanctuary city decisions continue to come down so quickly that this draft does not include the two most recent decisions, one of which was issued only last week. But I plan to incorporate them—and any subsequent rulings—in the final version of the article, which will be published later this year.

I summarized the big-picture issues at stake in the sanctuary cases in this op ed for The Hill, published last year.