National School Choice Week

School Vouchers Aren’t Welfare for the Rich

Data from North Carolina, Florida, and Arizona show how school choice programs take care of students who would otherwise be neglected.

|

|||Monkey Business Images/Dreamstime.com
Monkey Business Images/Dreamstime.com

"Do School Vouchers Only Benefit the Wealthy?" asks an article this month in Governing. Like too many headlines, the implication is that school choice is a scam that disproportionately benefits wealthy students who already live in high-performing districts. The Governing story suggests that Arizona's education savings accounts (ESAs)––publicly-funded savings accounts that parents can use to pay for private school tuition or other education services for their children––rarely help out those who authentically need assistance, favoring already-privileged children instead.

The article cites a 2017 report from The Arizona Republic which found that 75 percent of the ESA money went to students leaving districts that had an "A" or "B" ranking, and only 4 percent of the money followed students opting out of districts rated "D" or lower.

But these numbers hardly even hint at the full story. Arizona's ESA program can only be used by specific groups of disadvantaged students. In fact, Arizona Department of Education data from 2017 reveals that 82 percent of ESA recipients were students with special needs, from military families, or students from D/F rated schools. The discrepancy between the Republic data and the department data arises from the fact that ESA awards vary between $3,000 and $32,000, based primarily on the severity of a student's special needs. It is likely that students leaving D/F schools were receiving smaller awards because they were leaving for reasons other than having special needs.

Also, just because a student is coming from a higher-performing district does not necessarily mean they are wealthy: School choice critics argue that the ESAs are not enough for low-income families without additional resources to transfer their children elsewhere. But the average account value of an Arizona ESA is $13,431 while the average yearly private school tuition hovers around $10,889. Obviously, not everyone rewarded an ESA will enjoy the same range of opportunities based on the amount of additional resources they have, but there are plenty of low-income families that would have been blocked from even considering other options had they not received an ESA.

Wealthy families have long had school choice because they can afford to move to the districts with high-performing schools. Thanks to an antiquated government school funding system that closely ties zip code to education quality, low-income families have been at a disadvantage for decades. When they're implemented at the state level, school choice programs like Arizona's aim to give disadvantaged students a chance to break free from their circumstances and attend a school of higher quality than their neighborhood public school. They're meant to be a solution to the opportunity gap, not a way to make it worse.

So what happens in practice? Beneficiaries of school choice programs are mostly low-income and special needs children––and this is by design, not accident. Roughly one-third of existing programs exclusively serve students with special needs. As for programs not intended for special needs students, nearly all of them, nationwide, set income caps ranging from 185 percent of the federal poverty line ($45,510 for a family of four) to 300 percent of the federal poverty line ($73,800 for a family of four). The only cases where students above these income levels can participate are when they are attending low-performing schools. State-level reports also indicate that many participants are far below these income caps––in North Carolina, a 2017 report found that families using the state's Opportunity Scholarship voucher had a median income of $16,213. In Florida, the average household income of families using the state's Tax Credit Scholarship Program was only 8.8 percent above the federal poverty line, or $27,308 for a family of four.

Compared with the average public school student in the same area, participants in private school choice programs are far more likely to be low-income and minority students. Similarly, charter schools serve disproportionately high shares of minority and free or reduced-price lunch students (a good proxy for determining students from low-income families, since you have to be below 185 percent of the federal poverty line to qualify).

There are currently 65 private school choice programs spanning 29 states and the District of Columbia, serving an estimated total of 482,000 students. Additionally, 3.2 million more students are enrolled in charter schools. Over the years, opponents of school choice have claimed that choice programs are "welfare for the rich,"and "just a scam to make private schools cheaper for rich people." While it's easy to assume that those in power are cronies using school choice to help out their rich friends, it's a bit harder to produce facts to back that assumption up.

School choice isn't about leaving poor families behind and doling out favors to those who already have every advantage––it's about empowering parents to hold schools accountable. If families are happy with their current school, or find newly available options ill-suited for them, that's fine. But government shouldn't force families to stay trapped in failing and floundering schools, just because they correspond with their zip codes, when better alternatives can so easily be sought.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

16 responses to “School Vouchers Aren’t Welfare for the Rich

  1. Legitimate welfare for the rich seems to draw less ire than these movements.

    School choice is so obvious to me. I feel like if you stated the affirmative formation of how school assignment is done now, most would think it silly. “The only thing that determines which school your kids go to is where you live.” It’s silly, and transparently a means to prop up bad schools.

    1. Because the Left’s power is based in controlling the organs of indoctrination of society. Government schools give the power to indoctrinate children.

  2. Let’s look at the worst case scenario.

    We’re always told that public school teachers can’t teach effectively at least in part because class sizes are too large.

    So, the wealthy only benefit from vouchers, take their kids out of public school, class sizes in public schools decrease – everyone is better off.

  3. Just the fact that LeBron “King” James opened his own school in the Cleveland (or Akron) area tells me all I need to know about school choice and the failings of inner-city public schools. But of course King James is lauded as a HERO and Betsy Devos is the DEVIL, for advocating the same things.

  4. IIRC, schools in Texas get funding on the basis of their attendance.

    If my student attends elsewhere, shouldn’t the funding follow?

  5. School choice isn’t about leaving poor families behind and doling out favors to those who already have every advantage??it’s about empowering parents to hold schools accountable.

    Except that it’s not really empowering parents to hold schools accountable. We used to be able to do this when every school had its school board and there were thus 130,000+ different governance entities in the US with probably close to a million parents/neighbors serving part-time and volunteer on their school board. But then we consolidated public school governance into maybe 14,000 districts that combine all the elementary/middle/high schools into one governance entity which by its nature then becomes far more pedagogically professional. A parent who has kids in elementary has little interest and less knowledge about how the high school should be run and so that voice simply disappears from running schools.

    But providing ‘school choice’ doesn’t fix this at all. Those districts are going to instead become even MORE insiderish on the committees they set up to decide which school alternatives get taxes allocated to them for vouchers.

    1. The point of competition is that we don’t need to solve these sort of mechanistic problems. Make budget dependent on enrollment, and districts which don’t allow parents to provide input will lose their funding to the extent that frustrates the parents.

      1. School choice presumes that what you call ‘mechanistic problems’ are actually solved – without solving them. Parents are presumed to know exactly how to judge excellence in education – and to allocate taxes to make it happen. But incapable of actually doing that as part of a school board. And in this system the positive results will ONLY happen for their own kids. Others kids? well fytw. Good schools/classrooms can be created – but not in the buildings/classrooms that have already been built. Only in different buildings (and I’m willing to bet the land set aside for them has all sorts of tax boondoggles set aside as well).

        Honestly, the whole thing seems like just a way to ‘compete’ to rent-seek off of existing property taxes.

    2. The point of vouchers is that *parents* do the allocating of taxes to schools.

      1. The vouchers go to the schools that are approved by some voucher credentialing committee. Which is exactly the sort of smoke-filled room that ends up corrupt as hell. They ain’t gonna be allowed for some jackass parent to buy booze at the local liquor store

  6. It’s welfare for breeders who use it. As long as I have to pay to send someone’s kid to school while not having any of my own sent to school it is welfare. Just because it’s conservative backed welfare doesn’t make it OK and it definitely doesn’t make it libertarian.

  7. I earned $5000 last month by working online just for 5 to 8 hours on my laptop and this was so easy that i myself could not believe before working on this site. If You too want to earn such a big money then come.
    visit……….. http://www.Mesalary.com

  8. Hey!
    As for me using school vouchers is a cool occupation because students can save money on these vouchers! Money that students can save on these vouchers they can spend on buying some papers from the site that presents the company Paperial from which students buy research papers and other types of papers! It is the best research paper writing service that exists in the USA and that helps students a lot!

  9. I essentially started three weeks past and that i makes $385 benefit $135 to $a hundred and fifty consistently simply by working at the internet from domestic. I made ina long term! “a great deal obliged to you for giving American explicit this remarkable opportunity to earn more money from domestic. This in addition coins has adjusted my lifestyles in such quite a few manners by which, supply you!”. go to this website online domestic media tech tab for extra element thank you……

    http://www.geosalary.com

  10. School vouchers are welfare for the rich. So is public school in ritzy neighborhoods.

  11. School vouchers are good for everyone, believe me. It doesn’t matter if you are rich or not, your knowledge counts and that’s it. If you are educated enough and care about what you do, then you will never face some kind of scrutiny. Yes, you can face some problems while studying, but that’s ok. You can always use a speech writing service at https://paperell.com/speech-writing-service to get some help. Believe me, it will solve most of your problems and will help you with your study.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.