<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
		<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
			<channel>
			<title>Reason Magazine - Staff &gt; Ben Falk</title>
			<link>http://www.reason.com/staff</link>
			<description></description>
			<managingEditor>info@reason.com (Reason Online)</managingEditor>
			<generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
			
<item>
<title>Subsidized Spin</title>
<link>http://www.reason.com/news/show/33152.html</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;Robert Barker, a program manager at the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, says the portrayal of scientists in popular films is &amp;quot;downright insulting.&amp;quot; In light of the declining numbers of U.S. students pursuing science and engineering degrees, he also thinks it's a national security concern.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the Pentagon is spending $300,000 over three years to send mid-career scientists, researchers, and engineers to a workshop at the television and screenwriting school run by the American Film Institute. Their mission: to portray their field--and themselves--as cool. The hope: that working scientists will be inspired to produce screenplays that, in the words of the institute's Joe Petricca, don't paint &amp;quot;scientists as losers.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33152@http://www.reason.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate><author>info@reason.com (Ben Falk)</author>
</item>
			<atom:link href="http://reason.com/staff/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			</channel>
		</rss>
  		