Reason Magazine

Site Search

New at Reason

In this week's Friday Funny, Scott Stantis breaks out the ink and quill and commemorates the candidates' messages in the never-ending (but almost over!) Democratic race.
Send this article to:

« If Dirty Want His Money,… | Main | Grand Theft Auto IV Steals… »

Comments to "New at Reason":

Add a comment ↓

Taktix® | May 9, 2008, 8:14am | #

Wow, that was funny...

...like four months ago.

Episiarch | May 9, 2008, 8:22am | #

Lukewarm at best. At least it's not Bok, though.

Reinmoose | May 9, 2008, 8:41am | #

I love how bad these comics are
For real, Reason - can't you just hire me to do them, or something? I promise they will be no worse than the current ones.

P Brooks | May 9, 2008, 8:51am | #

If she gets elected, she probably won't call Stantis to do the official portrait.

BakedPenguin | May 9, 2008, 8:52am | #

Reinmoose - these are old, and of limited value to non-H&R'ers but...

check it out | May 9, 2008, 8:56am | #

http://hillaryis404.org/

joe | May 9, 2008, 9:26am | #

The Onion did the definitive Barack Obama "change" joke.

Anything else is a mere "Put 'Em On the Glass" to their "Baby Got Back."

Episiarch | May 9, 2008, 9:28am | #

Link, joe?

joe | May 9, 2008, 9:37am | #

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/black_guy_asks_nation_for_change

Episiarch | May 9, 2008, 9:42am | #

Ha ha, that's hilarious. Thanks.

Brandybuck | May 9, 2008, 1:44pm | #

TThis is the third election in a row where the election was the Democrats to lose. And I suspect they're going to deliberately lose it for the third time too. In 2004 the excuse was that they wanted to be in a position for a 2008 Hillary run, so what's their excuse this time?

R C Dean | May 9, 2008, 1:51pm | #

In 2004 the excuse was that they wanted to be in a position for a 2008 Hillary run, so what's their excuse this time?

Its really hard to build an electoral majority on a coalition of alienated fringe groups?

Or is that the libertarian excuse? I get confused.

joe | May 9, 2008, 2:23pm | #

Obviously, any candidate running against an incubment wartime president should win in a walk.

Like...um...what's his name. That guy who ran against an incubment president in wartime, and won. Oh, it's on the tip of my tongue!

Someone help me out here.

Paul | May 9, 2008, 6:56pm | #

Gerald Ford? No! Uhm, Lyndon Johnson. No wait, Harry Truman!!! What do I win?

Francesco Sinibaldi | May 10, 2008, 3:56pm | #

I'm lazy.

When the night
comes back
telling a story, I'm
lazy: beautiful
sounds of a primitive
faith appear in
my mind, and even
that arrow describes,
in a moment, the
slippery darkness
of a tender caprice,
there, where a
light fades away......

Francesco Sinibaldi

Comment on this article: