Reason Magazine

Site Search

Paul's Progress

The ever-readable Matt Labash, whose nigh-Faustian literary skills were enough to make John Cox interesting, takes on the Ron Paul musical REVOLution in the current Weekly Standard. Paul's inspired "atrocious music," but Labash isn't too hard on them...
Perhaps the most talented Paul songwriter I've encountered is the Pittsburgh folkie named Daryl Fleming, of Daryl Fleming and the Public Domain. He sings with a pleasing tomcat rasp, and when reaching for the bigger notes, sounds like he should be twinning harmonies with The Band's Levon Helm. Fleming feels that limited government is underrepresented in rock and folk music. He's a far cry from dancing pizzas and seems a bit self-conscious about the company he's keeping. "I am not guilty by association," he emails of the grab bag of other Paul supporters. "The 9-11 Truthers, white supremacists, and assorted kooks (perhaps some of the other songwriters?) who support Ron Paul do not invalidate his message. Faulting RP (or me) for some of his non-sanctioned supporters is like blaming Jodie Foster for the shooting of Ronald Reagan."
Over the weekend Paul won the Virginia GOP straw poll with 38 percent of the vote, even after Sen. George Allen made a personal appeal for Fred Thompson.

Republican officials dismissed the poll's outcome, noting that Paul has been concentrating on winning straw polls all over the country.

"He brought people in here. What is more critical to look at is who finished second and third. That is a more true indicator of the feelings of the Republican Party of Virginia," said Tucker Watkins of Randolph in Charlotte County, a former 5th District GOP chairman.

And that Des Moines Register poll that shows Mike Huckabee surging into first place in Iowa shows Paul rising from 4 percent to 7 percent, tied with John McCain.
Send this article to:

« How to Lose Your License… | Main | On Chavez and Laughland »

Comments to "Paul's Progress":

John-David | December 3, 2007, 5:00pm | #

I just got a voice mail today from Ron Paul's wife. Lovely lady, and it was a short call and to the point.

Edward | December 3, 2007, 5:08pm | #

It isn't the kooks who support Ron Paul that invalidate his message; it's Ron Paul's kooky messages:

The Founding fathers envisioned a robust Christian nation.
The Constitution is replete with references to God.
Birthright citizenship confers citizenship on many (read Mexicans) who are diloyal to America.
Kooks love kooks.

Edward | December 3, 2007, 5:13pm | #

And btw, "kooks love kooks" also explains the Urkobold website. Unfunny cunt boils.

steve | December 3, 2007, 5:14pm | #

So now Ron Paul is busing people in? There is video of this event and there are no Ron Paul buses and probably never will be.

I love the spin of these people, It is more important to see who is 2nd and 3rd? Do you people really buy that?

Fact doesn't everyone try to win the straw poll? Ron paul has won most polls either online, text, or straw he dominates.

Keep playing the spin people we will see you in IA and NH

Minion of URKOBOLD | December 3, 2007, 5:16pm | #

Edward | December 3, 2007, 5:13pm | #
And btw, "kooks love kooks" also explains the Urkobold website. Unfunny cunt boils.
DAMMIT - IT'S ABSCESSED, RUNNY BOILS! GET IT RIGHT NEXT TIME.

(full confession: it's really fun lancing them with a darning needle that's been coated with lemon juice)

J Bradford | December 3, 2007, 5:18pm | #

Edward,

I would like to comment on what you wrote, but I'm trying my best to even understand your post.

Are you trying to say those are Ron Paul's messages??

Episiarch | December 3, 2007, 5:20pm | #

What is more critical to look at is who finished second and third. That is a more true indicator of the feelings of the Republican Party of Virginia," said Tucker Watkins of Randolph in Charlotte County

This makes sense. So the guys who place second and third in the Olympics are the real gold-medal winners? It's all clear now, Tucker.

pumaz | December 3, 2007, 5:20pm | #

You have got to be kidding me:
"He brought people in here. What is more critical to look at is who finished second and third. That is a more true indicator of the feelings of the Republican Party of Virginia,"

This is one of the most rediculous statements I have read yet. The rEVOLution is real...and might be televised.
Join the teaparty Dec 16.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

Ali (aka iih) | December 3, 2007, 5:23pm | #

I met the man on Saturday and shook his hand and personally thanked him for all that he does for America. Such a warm personality. It was a delightful weekend.

fish | December 3, 2007, 5:27pm | #

Now Edward you promised during your last anti Paul rant that weren't going to post here anymore.....shoo.....shoo! Back to Pandagon with you!

Cesar | December 3, 2007, 5:29pm | #

Over the weekend Paul won the Virginia GOP straw poll with 38 percent of the vote, even after Sen. George Allen made a personal appeal for Fred Thompson.'

Macaca man probably cost Thompson a few votes.

Lucas | December 3, 2007, 5:32pm | #

Bussed people in....they must be thinking of Romney! LOL

Pig Mannix | December 3, 2007, 5:32pm | #

Today Rasmussen's Daily Presidential Tracking Poll shows him at 7% nationally, which is the highest he's scored yet.

Hey, it's a start.

Fluffy | December 3, 2007, 5:35pm | #

7% is OK to build on when the campaign is a few more days of bad Rudy press away from having everyone else bunched in the teens.

Paul's only chance is a split field. But a split field is exactly what the Republican party is giving him.

Nash | December 3, 2007, 5:42pm | #

"What is more critical to look at is who finished second and third. That is a more true indicator of the feelings of the Republican Party of Virginia," said Tucker Watkins of Randolph in Charlotte County"

War is peace, love is hate, second is first!! Just ask Florida.

Pig Mannix | December 3, 2007, 5:43pm | #

7% is OK to build on when the campaign is a few more days of bad Rudy press away from having everyone else bunched in the teens.

Well, yeah, but he's going to have to start showing some progress in the polls. The money is all very nice, but what counts in elections is votes. He's made tremendous progress, sure, but he seems to have plateaued in the high single digits. He's going to have to keep advancing to remain viable.

penxv | December 3, 2007, 5:47pm | #

The best Ron Paul song that I've seen is this one...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bCRc2ub8hU

But the best song that I think can pertain to the freedom movement generally and not particularly to Ron Paul is this one...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlqfpPf_EO0

Jamie Kelly | December 3, 2007, 5:47pm | #

Edward is a coward and a pussy. Oh, and stupid.
Cowpusstu, for short.
That's why he'll never leave when he's already promised to, and why URKOBOLD will continue to flame his powdery little boy butt.

Captain Chaos | December 3, 2007, 5:49pm | #

I've got to wonder how Edward and DonderOOOOOOO (oddly absent on this thread so far) get here so quickly. Do they hover over H&R, waiting for any mention of Paul? Or this there some sort of moonbat signal involved?

Taktix® | December 3, 2007, 5:49pm | #

"He brought people in here. What is more critical to look at is who finished second and third. That is a more true indicator of the feelings of the Republican Party of Virginia," said Tucker Watkins of Randolph in Charlotte County, a former 5th District GOP chairman.

Uhh, what?

I can only attribute a statement this idiotic to politicians...

Cynico | December 3, 2007, 5:52pm | #

Even a Paris Hilton CD is more listenable that horrors like that "If You Google Ron Paul" ditty.

Brad | December 3, 2007, 5:53pm | #

Socialists Suck !!!

America is not supposed to be socialist.

I want my country back you tax and spend wacks.

Government does nothing well; why continue to give them more power over your daily lives.

I am voting for Ron Paul in the hope that my children will not be financial slaves to the debt or for the hope that we will not have to sell our country to Dubai when we go bankrupt.

Fools and their rights are soon parted.

George | December 3, 2007, 5:55pm | #

Hey Edward quit fingering your pussy and go online and do some actual research for the presidential candidates for 08

bob | December 3, 2007, 5:56pm | #

Now and then I thank the liberal proprietor of a local blog, and rib him at the same time by running a Ron Paul blogad.

Hearing news of the blimp, I figured it was time for another ad. But the trouble was, when I rotated the blimp pic to fit the tall and narrow space provided, it looked like it was crashing! (Not exactly the brand image we're going for...)

Not giving up easily, I removed the fins and gondola, and advertised it as the "Ron Paul Revolution Suppository" A sure cure for cronic neoconitis. The ad's here for one week.

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 5:59pm | #

I'm here. But it doesn't mean that I have to comment on every little thing that comes up. Am I not allowed to just read what others post sometimes? Or, do I absolutely must post something, so that you all can bash me mercilessly thread on thread?

Nash | December 3, 2007, 6:01pm | #

"I'm here. But it doesn't mean that I have to comment on every little thing that comes up. Am I not allowed to just read what others post sometimes? Or, do I absolutely must post something, so that you all can bash me mercilessly thread on thread?"

Quick post something stupid so we can bash you! In the meantime I'm trying to find a way to bash this post. Need more content plz kthnx

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 6:03pm | #

I'll say only this. I've noticed a shift in the last few days in the GOP primary. My guy Rudy is losing some ground. Not at danger levels yet, but somewhat troubling.

Huckabee is the man of the hour. I'm sure we can all agree on that. This has shaken up my Republican friends, the mainline RedState.com conservative types. All of a sudden they're talking of unity around one fiscal conservative to head off the populist liberal Huckabee.

That unity candidate is either going to be Giuliani or Romney. I'm hoping it's Rudy, but if not, Mitt's just fine with me.

It's too the point now where even Ron Paulists need to start considering that fiscal liberal Mike Huckabee is for real. If we fiscal cons/libertarians don't unite behind one candidate soon, we could all end up the losers.

Mitt, and Fred are both acceptable to this Rudy guy. I think you Paul-bots need to compromise a bit, agree to join the rest of us, under a Mitt or Fred banner, and beat back the Huckabee threat.

VM | December 3, 2007, 6:04pm | #

BAWK BAWK! INTERNET ATTACK CHICKEN SPOTTED!

YES! DUNDEROOOOOOO!

BAWK BAWK! THE FLAMING INTERNET ATTACK CHICKEN AND COWARD EXTRAORDINAIRE!!!

DUNDEROOOOO!

Jamie Kelly | December 3, 2007, 6:04pm | #

Or, do I absolutely must post something, so that you all can bash me mercilessly thread on thread?

Yes.
So, do you carrot-fuck yourself to orgasm looking at pictures of Giuliani?
Bye now.

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 6:06pm | #

Ahh, what would a weekday be without all the Dondero bashing.

But interesting not a one of you has the guts to say anything to my face - I live in the Nation's 4th largest city, Houston, TX and would be happy to meet you all any time, any wheres.

Or, to pick up the phone and say it to me on my cell - 832-896-9505. Just who'se the chicken? Notice many of you post here on bogus names like Fluffy, and stupid shit like that. At least I post my real name, AND my cell number.

Kolohe | December 3, 2007, 6:07pm | #

This makes sense. So the guys who place second and third in the Olympics are the real gold-medal winners? It's all clear now, Tucker.

I would say that the Va GOP lately is more analogous to the *Special* Olymics, but that's pretty insulting to the mentally handicapped.

Craig | December 3, 2007, 6:07pm | #

Republican officials dismissed the poll's outcome, noting that Paul has been concentrating on winning straw polls all over the country. "He brought people in here."

Actually, "he" (meaning Ron Paul) hasn't been concentrating on winning straw polls, and "he" didn't bring any people to their straw poll. The people who support Ron Paul are concentrating on showing up to vote, on their own.

Where the heck are Rudy's supporters? His record in straw polls is abysmal. I wonder if his support in random telephone surveys will translate into votes?

Keith | December 3, 2007, 6:07pm | #

I wish someone would make a website with a compilation of Ron Paul songs that can be downloaded, burned, and blasted in my hood.

Jamie Kelly | December 3, 2007, 6:08pm | #

I think you Paul-bots Ron Paul supporters need to compromise abandon your principles a bit, agree to join surrender to the rest of us, under a Mitt or Fred banner retreat flag, and beat back the Huckabee threat.

The answer is no, shitface.

AfricanAmericans4Paul | December 3, 2007, 6:10pm | #

Ron Paul has won the majority of EVERY poll that has been held, so far. The only polls he hasn't dominated are the polls where the media pollsters call lonely shut-ins who voted for W twice -- even when he ran unopposed, in the last primary.

When Paul wins NH, MI, NV, and WY, are we supposed to still believe that it only matters who comes in 2nd and 3rd??????????

What happens when he takes 10 states on Super Tuesday? That doesn't count either????????????

Are the NeoClowns gonna demand a "do over"?

Is Paul the ONLY candidate "trying to win"? Well, then, that's just good news for us, isn't it?

The NeoClowns are wetting their pants over Paul. They closed half the open primaries in his honor.

Join the Revolution!

RonPaul2008.com

Jamie Kelly | December 3, 2007, 6:11pm | #

pick up the phone and say it to me on my cell - 832-896-9505

I'd rather spend my allotted minutes stuck in a voice-mail tree trying to get a loan for a ball transplant.

Tannim | December 3, 2007, 6:12pm | #

While ignoring the usual flamespam from Edward and Dunderhead...here's teh interesting part:

"What is more critical to look at is who finished second and third. That is a more true indicator of the feelings of the Republican Party of Virginia," said Tucker Watkins of Randolph in Charlotte County"

There is actual truth here. If you look at second (Thompson) and third (Huckabee) there, what do you see? A lack of support. That's telling. If they have no support, then their polling numbers are inflated by the MSM, especially Huckabee, and that is borne out by his lack of fundraising (see also Fizzled HuckaBomb) and his lack of people and publicity on the ground.

What this means is that the old axiom "The world is run by those who show up" is true, and Dr. Paul's supporters are showing up, in droves. That must drive the GOP establishment (and Edward and Dunderhead) nuts! That's a good sign for those of us that love freedom and peace and prosperity over tyranny, war, and poverty.

RaferJanders | December 3, 2007, 6:12pm | #

Edward you little attention hoar, but your welcome to your uninformed oppinion, and good on ya for proof that you really are a little wog," Arn't Ya". Dr. Paul is every American's Truth in Government Choice. Thanks All,
Ron Paul 08

Craig | December 3, 2007, 6:13pm | #

Well, yeah, but he's going to have to start showing some progress in the polls. The money is all very nice, but what counts in elections is votes. He's made tremendous progress, sure, but he seems to have plateaued in the high single digits. He's going to have to keep advancing to remain viable.

The votes ARE what count, but they have a very tenuous relationship to the polls, especially the polls in early December for the primaries.

Even if Ron Paul never polls above 10%, and the polls are even reasonably accurate, he could still win the nomination, just by getting his supporters to turn out at several times the rate the other guys get their supporters to turn out.

Turnout in the primaries is usually 15-20% (though New Hampshire is significantly higher than that), so a candidate at 10% in the polls could get 30 or 40% of the vote.

It would take exceptionally motivated and well-organized supporters, but anyone who doubts the motivation and the organization of Ron Paul supporters after November 5th is on pretty shaky ground.

J sub D | December 3, 2007, 6:13pm | #

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 5:59pm | #

I'm here.


Where's the Kwell cream when you need it?

Nash | December 3, 2007, 6:14pm | #

"This has shaken up my Republican friends, the mainline RedState.com conservative types. All of a sudden they're talking of unity around one fiscal conservative to head off the populist liberal Huckabee."

Welcome aboard to the Ron Paul Revolution!!

"That unity candidate is either going to be Giuliani or Romney. I'm hoping it's Rudy, but if not, Mitt's just fine with me."

And that is why we fail.

"It's too the point now where even Ron Paulists need to start considering that fiscal liberal Mike Huckabee is for real. If we fiscal cons/libertarians don't unite behind one candidate soon, we could all end up the losers."

Yes very good. Welcome aboard to the Ron Paul Revolution!!

"Mitt, and Fred are both acceptable to this Rudy guy. I think you Paul-bots need to compromise a bit, agree to join the rest of us, under a Mitt or Fred banner, and beat back the Huckabee threat."

Mitt is not acceptable because Mitt isn't a fiscal conservative either. Fred is my second choice but he's polling below Paul and is basically a watered down version who doesn't have the guts to explain to the American people that we can't afford to wage a sustained war in the middle east without the dollar imploding.

The current Republican party and Mike Huckabee deserve each other. The party has tossed every other conservative principle out the window, may as well wear the populist taxation and spending on their sleeve and call it a day.

Cornholio | December 3, 2007, 6:20pm | #

No one has voted yet you idiots. Polls are for the media, and those who believe them are stupid. I appear to be in the sweet spot for polling and I lie to those polls all the time, its fun, try it.
Quick game.
Let me say "grass roots organic support". Guess who we are talking about?

Times Up Neo-Con idiot.

If you guessed any of the George Bush big- government imperialist wannabes, you guessed wrong.

The man can be trusted with your vote. He will do what he says. We all finally have some hope, and a candidate that we can actually vote FOR!
WOOT!

Cesar | December 3, 2007, 6:22pm | #

Eric-

I wouldn't post my cell number because I get enough spam just from posting my email address. Posting your cell phone, in public, on the internet, isn't ballsy. Its stupid. S-t-u-p-i-d.

VM | December 3, 2007, 6:22pm | #

J sub - at least you can get to see a good picture of dunderoooo!

(my! what a "man" is he!)

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 6:28pm | #

Cesar, I have posted my cell number on my website at www.mainstreamlibertarian.com since its inception. I get 200 to 300 unique visitors a day to that site.

Tell me, I don't get it. What's the difference from posting your number on a forum like Reason and a website?

Anyone can Google "Eric Dondero" and get to my website and get my number any way. So, why should I care?

Corey | December 3, 2007, 6:28pm | #

Ron Paul isn't Mitt Romney. He doesn't bus people anywhere. his supporters bus themselves on Romney's busses. He spends his money on getting his message out to the public, not sending people to Straw Polls.

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 6:30pm | #

No, on the contrary Romney is quite fiscally conservative. He was supported enthusiastically by the Republican Liberty Caucus in his run for US Senate against Ted Kennedy in 1992 and his subsequent run for Governor. What's cool about Romney is that he's a Northeasterner. And the Republican Party desperately needs that.

I'll support him 100% if he's the Nominee.

BTW, William Weld has endorsed Romney. And anyone good enough for Weld is certainaly good enough for me.

I believe, but am not 100% sure that libertarian State Senator Bob Hedlund of Mass, has also endorsed Romney.

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 6:33pm | #

Ron Paul is polling decently in New Hampshire and South Carolina. But he's not polling well at all in big states like his home state of Texas, California, New Jersey, and especially Florida where he languishes in the 3% range. Unless he can build support in big states, he's not going to go far beyond the 5% range.

J sub D | December 3, 2007, 6:34pm | #

Mister Moose,

I'll get you for that. When you least expect it, expect it.

Cesar | December 3, 2007, 6:37pm | #

Are you seriously going to support Huckabee if he wins Dondi?

ondigo | December 3, 2007, 6:38pm | #

I thought the point of straw polls was to see which candidate could actually get their supporters to come out (and pay $$) as a show of their organizational strength. Its sort of a dick-measuring tool for big-money donors to know which candidate is swinging longest. That way they know who to suck up to. (Do I know how to work a metaphor, or what!)
It was glorious to read between the lines in the WaPo. Va GOP head John Hager was spitting mad, I gather.

Libertad | December 3, 2007, 6:40pm | #

"But the best song that I think can pertain to the freedom movement generally and not particularly to Ron Paul is this one...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlqfpPf_EO0"

Let me propose another..

http://youtube.com/watch?v=01JQe00XHPI

A warning though...the song is in that meskin' language.

dovv | December 3, 2007, 6:41pm | #

Daughters of Vietnam Veterans for RON PAUL!!

pdog | December 3, 2007, 6:47pm | #

Huckabee would be my worst nightmare. He represents everything I would dislike in a canidate. He is like, the anti-libertarian.

Cesar | December 3, 2007, 6:49pm | #

Huckabee would be my worst nightmare. He represents everything I would dislike in a canidate. He is like, the anti-libertarian.

Those were my thoughts exactly. Hes an economic populist and a social reactionary. Pat Buchanan with a Bible college diploma.

DF Robichaux | December 3, 2007, 6:51pm | #

The polls are wrong and have been in primarys forever in contested races. Ron Paul will win the Republican nomination because:

Huckabee will take Iowa because of the christianist vote then hit a brick wall in NH, Nevada, Wyoming, Michigan and South Carolina. He is back down to middle of the pack after that.

Guiliani will not get off of the ground in the early states and will be buried in the south.

Romeny beaten by Huckabee in Iowa, flip-flops his momentum in the following primaries.

McCain's only chance is New Hampshire and he will not get it done. He does not rise a third time.

Thompson never left the ground and is just digging deeper.

That means that Paul will:
Place in the top 3 in Iowa.
1st in N.H- open primary and libertarian hotbed
1st in Nevada- open primary and libertarian hotbed
Top 2 in Michigan - open primary with antiwar Demo’s coming over after self-disqualification.
Top 3 in South Carolina.

Ron Paul after the first round will have more top 3 finishes than anyone else and will not have to look back. The intial primary states except for Iowa are made to order for a Goldwater Republican who's time has come.

http://www.lifebelowi10.blogspot.com/

Joe | December 3, 2007, 6:58pm | #

It's offical the GOP establishment has lost there mind! As a lifelong Republican who supports Ron Paul all I ask is what are they smokin up there in the GOP penthouse?

""Over the weekend Paul won the Virginia GOP straw poll with 38 percent of the vote, even after Sen. George Allen made a personal appeal for Fred Thompson.
Republican officials dismissed the poll's outcome, noting that Paul has been concentrating on winning straw polls all over the country.

"He brought people in here. What is more critical to look at is who finished second and third. That is a more true indicator of the feelings of the Republican Party of Virginia," said Tucker Watkins of Randolph in Charlotte County, a former 5th District GOP chairman.""

J sub D | December 3, 2007, 7:00pm | #

DF Robichaux,
I really like your optimism. I think there might be too much tint in your eyeglasses (i.e. ain't gonna happen, sure hope I'm wrong).
Still, I really like your optimism.

BakedPenguin | December 3, 2007, 7:06pm | #

Even if Ron Paul never polls above 10%, and the polls are even reasonably accurate, he could still win the nomination, just by getting his supporters to turn out at several times the rate the other guys get their supporters to turn out.
I'm not quite as optimistic as Craig, but I think the polls are going to be woefully wrong about Paul - (e.g., they're going to have to revise their margin of error). Mainly, I think Paul's support among college-age voters who often don't have land lines is going to distort the numbers they've been working with. Also, depending on the methodology of the survey, they might not be talking to all of the right people. If they're only asking voters who were registered (R) from last year's rolls, that's going to ignore a lot of people who switched just to vote for Paul.

The change in primary voting days may wind up helping Paul if the January weather is bad. Paul voters definitely seem much more enthusiastic about voting than others. (Can you see a Thompson voter slushing through freezing rain to vote for in the primary? I think Fred himself would look out the window and say "ah, the hell with it.")

As for songs about freedom, Suspect Device is a punk ditty written about the Irish "Troubles", but it could easily apply to the Patriot Act.

bob | December 3, 2007, 7:09pm | #

In April, when I began supporting Ron Paul, if someone had told me that by December he'd be spending big on radio and TV, and would still have 10 million in the bank and a blimp set for launch, I'd have classified the remark as overly optimistic.

His campaign has been very surprising so far, and likely holds a few more.

Taktix® | December 3, 2007, 7:09pm | #

The change in primary voting days may wind up helping Paul if the January weather is bad.

I'm fucking rain-dancing at my next MeetUp!

AfricanAmericans4Paul | December 3, 2007, 7:10pm | #

Eric Dondero wrote:
"Ron Paul is polling decently in New Hampshire and South Carolina. But he's not polling well at all in big states..."
| December 3, 2007, 6:33pm |

It doesn't matter. Paul is under polling by at least 50%, and his supporters are at least twice as likely as anyone else's (except the Huckster's, whose support is soft, but somewhat enthusiast) to show up and vote. Do the math. As someone else here pointed out (and as I've suspected all along), even if Paul never polls above 10% (among the shut-in W loyalists the media is calling), he can still win the nomination decisively.

Except for Tancredo and Hunter (who are Hamiltonians), the rest of the field are just socialists. If you support any of them, PLEASE stop calling yourself a "libertarian." You're as much a libertarian as Bill Maher.

As for the general election, Ron Paul is polarizing among NeoClowns and Progressives, but will deliver so many disaffected Democrats, 3rd party members, and Independents that he could easily deliver the most decisive victory for the Republican party since 1984....unless the NeoClowns support a John Anderson style spoiler candidate (McCain seems a likely choice for this).

The question isn't whether Paul will go 3rd party, if he loses the GOP nomination. The real question is whether the NeoClowns will try to sabotage Paul, if he wins the nomination.

Josh McDonald | December 3, 2007, 7:10pm | #

All I see are kooks calling other people kooks. I love how anti Ron Paul people call his followers crazy. Neo-kooks are so high and mighty, have no humility, are responsible for this war, and think of themselves as "such good normal god-fearing people." It doesn't really matter because, just like we said in 2004, "if Kerry loses to Bush, the amazingly ignorant neo-kook administration would all but kill the Republican party. Now were going to get health care, immigration, education, social security, all of it. And it never would of happened without George Bush!!
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha. THE LIBERALS WIN!!!!! hahahahahahahahahahahahaha. All hail King George the Kook!!!!
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha. THE BEST PART IS THAT DEMOCRATS DIDNT EVEN SAY ANYTHING, THEY LET YOU KILL YOURSELF WITH YOUR OWN MOUTH!!!
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaa.

Josh McDonald | December 3, 2007, 7:12pm | #

hahahhahahahahahahahaha

Edward | December 3, 2007, 7:12pm | #

The Ron Paul Xmas Song

Ron Paul, the hopeless candidate
had a very tiny head.
And if you ever heard him,
As a candidate you'd say he's dead.

All of the other candidates
used to laugh and call him names.
They never let poor Ron Paul
join in any candidate games.

Then one foggy Christmas Eve
Libertarians came to say:
"Ron Paul with your head so small,
won't stop our imminent fall?"

Then all the candidates mocked him
as they shouted out with glee,
Ron Paul the small-headed candidate,
you'll go down in history!

VM | December 3, 2007, 7:15pm | #

Pic of EDWEIRDOOOOO.

Edward | December 3, 2007, 7:17pm | #

j sub d

Sometimes optimism is a sign of stupidity.

Dynamist Dan | December 3, 2007, 7:34pm | #

And trolling a website with ad hominem attacks on a presidential candidate is a sign of genius.

You'd think the Republican party would at least recognize the potential power Ron Paul supporters may yield in the general election and treat them with some level of respect. This arrogance and disrespect may very well backfire on them.

Jeremiah Ellison | December 3, 2007, 7:54pm | #

You know, I really don't understand the Republican party any more.

They treat the most conservative man like he doesn't belong here while a Democrat leads the polls in the Republican primary. All the while alienating the conservatives behind the true leader.

What the hell is up with this, people? Giuliani is NOT a Republican! And you're trying to say that Ron Paul doesn't belong in the party?

Fine. The Republican party can go to hell, then.

Taktix® | December 3, 2007, 8:03pm | #

You know, I really don't understand the Republican party any more.

I blame their simultaneous control of the legislative and executive branches.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and all that...

Phillip Webizen | December 3, 2007, 8:16pm | #

"He's made tremendous progress, sure, but he seems to have plateaued in the high single digits. He's going to have to keep advancing to remain viable."

What makes you think he's plateau'd? There's no evidence for this: another blatant lie and pathetic spin. You must be desperate, or is it just wishful thinking? Either way, your piece is neither objective, truthful or informative.

sage | December 3, 2007, 8:26pm | #

In about 90 minutes I'm going to a local GOP meeting. I have a precinct to cover and everything. I'll let everyone know how it goes.

Someone Who Doesn't Want to Lose His Job | December 3, 2007, 8:41pm | #

Taktix® | December 3, 2007, 8:03pm | #
You know, I really don't understand the Republican party any more.

I blame their simultaneous control of the legislative and executive branches.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and all that...
But it does rock absolutely as well.

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 8:45pm | #

Oh my God. You all will not believe who just lent his backing to Rudy Giuliani for President.

He's probably one of the Top 5 most well-known libertarians in the Nation, certainly tops on the tax issue.

This is huge!

JoinRudy2008.com

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 8:49pm | #

Keep saying that Giuliani doesn't lean libertarian.

He's got Steve Forbes, Dennis Miller, Sally Pipes, Deroy Murdock and scores of other indentified "libertarians" backing him. And now today, a huge announcement from the Giuliani campaign.

This one tops them all, except perhaps Forbes.

It's a big one. A really, really big one.

And a shocker, cause up til now he's kept mum on any public endorsements in the primary.

Brandybuck | December 3, 2007, 9:09pm | #

Faulting RP (or me) for some of his non-sanctioned supporters is like blaming Jodie Foster for the shooting of Ronald Reagan."
Now that I think about it, I do seem to remember a few people blaming Jodie Foster for that. It was on the lines of "look how eeevil hollywood is".

bob | December 3, 2007, 9:11pm | #

Bigger than a blimp?

DDS | December 3, 2007, 9:17pm | #

well Dondi, you've convinced me, I am DEFINITELY voting for giuliani now...

Ray L | December 3, 2007, 9:19pm | #

Who do you think we are...Ron Paul has the most support out of all. Time and Time again Ron Paul wins every poll, it is time to let go and give a true review.

thoreau | December 3, 2007, 9:19pm | #

Well, let's see here. I could look at Rudy's authoritarian tendencies and his lack of any concrete proposal for significant spending cuts. Or I could just trust that Grover Norquist must know what he's talking about, and this will most assuredly work out.

Let's see, should I trust authority, or should I examine evidence? Man, tough call.

kc | December 3, 2007, 9:20pm | #

As far as I'm concerned, the single best campaign song of all time is "Ron Paul for the Long Haul."

The fact that Labash neglected it is a crime against God and Man.

Franklin Harris | December 3, 2007, 9:20pm | #

He's got Steve Forbes, Dennis Miller, Sally Pipes, Deroy Murdock and scores of other indentified "libertarians" backing him.
In other words, he has no libertarians backing him. But we knew that already.

Brandybuck | December 3, 2007, 9:23pm | #

Has anyone called Dondero yet? I'm tempted too, but I don't have an unlisted number. After last week's unprovoked attack on me, I'm not about to allow him the luxury of reciprocity.

Ali (aka iih) | December 3, 2007, 9:32pm | #

Paul is on CSPAN 2 now (I am on the East Coast). 40 more minutes to go (30 already over).

Ali (aka iih) | December 3, 2007, 9:33pm | #


He's got Steve Forbes, Dennis Miller, Sally Pipes, Deroy Murdock and scores of other indentified "libertarians" backing him.


What is an indentified libertarian. One with dents?

mk | December 3, 2007, 9:35pm | #

Straw polls mean fuck all.

revotenow | December 3, 2007, 9:45pm | #

Eric, and the others who say us Ron Paul supporters need to compromise and get behind another candidate, know this.

We will not compromise, we will not flip flop. We will stand behind our candidate because we believe in him, his message, our country, our constitution, and our liberties. We do this even though it is hard and unpopular, we do this because our founders did, our grandfathers did, so our sons/daughters will not have to.

Why don’t you become uncompromised and support Ron Paul.

"In times of change, the patriot is a scarce man; brave, hated, and scorned." Mark Twain. "Only 5% of the population needed to reach critical mass." Can't remember.

Ali (aka iih) | December 3, 2007, 9:47pm | #

revotenow- I stand with you!

Edward | December 3, 2007, 9:50pm | #

Things that are more likely than Ron Paul winning

Jesus returns to Earth.
Hamas recognizes Israel.
Some doctor says obesity is dangerous and Reason lets it pass.
Giuliani drops out and endorses Hillary.
The Mafia gives all its money to charity and goes out of business.

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 9:56pm | #

Franklin? That you? Saying that Forbes, Sally Pipes, and DeRoy Murdock are "not libertarians."

Golly gee there Franklin. I wasn't aware someone had died and made you boss. Wasn't aware that you were all of a sudden crowned "King of the Libertarians" able to decide who is and who is not properly "Christened" with the "libertarian" label.

Quite the power you have there.

Did Murray Rothbard pass it on to you on his death bed or something?

Oops, I plum forgot. Murray died in a chair at a waiting room at a Doctor's office, so it couldn't have been him.

Tell us Franklin who was thy gentleman who christened Thee "King of the Libertarians"?

stewie | December 3, 2007, 9:58pm | #

For the record, my political choices will be:

1.) Ron Paul
2.) Whomever the LP runs
3.) Obama
4.) Richardson

The rest of them (from both parties) are worthless sacks of shite.

Eric Dondero | December 3, 2007, 10:07pm | #

Obama 'eh? A man who has a perfect 100 score from the Marxist ADA. And Richardson the smoking ban champion? Wasn't enough for Richardson to just ban smoking in restaurants. Nah, he had to ban it in bars too, in the entire State of New Mexico.

A Marxist who studied in a Radical Islamic Madrassa as a little boy, and a Nanny-Stater.

Are you sure you're a libertarian?

bob | December 3, 2007, 10:30pm | #

Let me translate for you Eric. People who prefer Ron Paul don't have to be libertarian.

Duh!

Edward | December 3, 2007, 10:47pm | #

stewie

So let me get this straight. If Ron Paul loses, the LP doesn't run anybody, and Richardson wins the dem nomination, you're supporting him. Hmmm, interesting.

dpotts | December 3, 2007, 11:11pm | #


So let me get this straight. If Ron Paul loses, the LP doesn't run anybody, and Richardson wins the dem nomination, you're supporting him. Hmmm, interesting.


I don't get what's so hard to understand. Richardson might be something of a nanny state dem, but he's got a better foreign policy platform than any Republican outside of Paul.

It's our foreign policy, stupid.

AfricanAmericans4Paul | December 3, 2007, 11:38pm | #

Eric Dondero wrote:
"Are you sure you're a libertarian"
| December 3, 2007, 10:07pm |

You still don't get it? Ron Paul has one of the broadest coalitions in recent political history. That's what makes him a winning candidate for the GOP in the general election (probably the only GE winner the GOP has). How many times do you need this explained to you?

The problem that most NeoClowns have with Paul is his principled and consistent opposition to the Iraq debacle. This is very interesting, considering that it is now generally considered a mistake (even among most Republicans), in that the pretext for the war was erroneous. The best excuse most can come up with for a continued US presence is that we're already there; In other word, "Yeah, we were wrong, but now that we're there, we have to finish the job" (a rational that makes about as much sense as "mistaking" a stranger for your wife, but refusing to pull out 'til you're "finished"), or -- as the Huckster dubiously "reasons" -- "Well, shucks, we done broke it, so now we gotta fix it." And THAT's the basis of your rejection of Paul? Because he was right all along, and objects to perpetuating an error? Stop drinking te koolaide.

sage | December 3, 2007, 11:49pm | #

Ugh.

The meeting went only "OK," and I found out something very discouraging. When I am working as a precinct committee officer (which I was elected to tonight), I cannot stump for any particular candidate (thanks a lot, Mctaint/Finemold!). So I will have to be very careful about how I go about doing this.

Sigh. This post to no one in particular, especially a specific cockbite on this thread.

Franlin | December 4, 2007, 12:03am | #

On this date in 2003, John Kerry was polling 4% nationally (lower than Ron Paul). Something to think about.

Someone Who Doesn't Want to Lose His Job | December 4, 2007, 12:06am | #

sage: good luck, man.

Franklin | December 4, 2007, 12:21am | #

Eric, no, that wasn't me but, if it makes you feel better, I don't think they're libertarians either. Then again, I don't think anyone that would support Giuliani for pres is a libertarian (not saying I don't have other reasons). I'm no guardian of the label, I could care less. Hell, the LP has done enough to destroy the label. That's just what I think. Remember, even the word liberal used to mean something different. Maybe one day, after the neocons have changed the meaning of the word libertarian, I'll have to refer to myself as a "classical libertarian".

Oh, and Paul is at 7% nationally in todays Rasmussen. That's 3% higher than Kerry on this day 2003.

Ali (aka iih) | December 4, 2007, 12:39am | #

Franklin-

You know what, to hell with labels. These gets labeled and relabeled. What brings people together are common beliefs, philosophical, and political views. Labels are just like flags; they too can be used to lead one to fascism and totalitarianism. I would always give Eric the benefit of the doubt when he says that he or Rudy are libertarian. They just define "libertarian" in a fundamentally different way than what you and I would define it. But who cares, what matters are our positions on the issues.

Pig Mannix | December 4, 2007, 12:50am | #

@Phillip Webizen

What makes you think he's plateau'd? There's no evidence for this: another blatant lie and pathetic spin. You must be desperate, or is it just wishful thinking?

I say I think he's plateaued because he hasn't really advanced his standing in the polls since early November! That isn't wishful thinking, that's worried thinking. I'm one of his supporters. I'd like to see him steadily improving his standing.

bob | December 4, 2007, 1:16am | #

Over a third of the November 5th contributions came from first time donors.

Screw the polls. Money talks.

mketcher | December 4, 2007, 1:17am | #

Here's a new music video that supports Ron Paul. It's not about Ron, per se, but it's an excerpt from a zombie-musical feature film, "Song of the Dead." The filmmaker is giving $1 from each DVD sold to the Ron Paul campaign. The film is an anti-war satire that takes aim at the war on terror and the MSM.
See it at:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=qQmkkoxSKYw

Mad Max | December 4, 2007, 1:24am | #

Eric D/R,

I’m sorry that some of the H&R comments have gotten so vitriolic as to make you look reasonable by comparison. You’re acting like you’re trying to engage people in conversation, and I appreciate that.

However, it will take more than talking down Dr. Paul, and dropping the names of the many libertarians/conservatives who are hedging their bets by supporting other candidates, to get me to give up on the good Doctor. He’s the only candidate I can vote for without needing a shower afterwards.

“No, on the contrary Romney is quite fiscally conservative. He was supported enthusiastically by the Republican Liberty Caucus in his run for US Senate against Ted Kennedy in 1992 and his subsequent run for Governor. What's cool about Romney is that he's a Northeasterner. And the Republican Party desperately needs that.”

OK, Romney is more fiscally conservative than Ted Kennedy. I give him that. But then again, 100 boatloads of drunken sailors with unlimited charge accounts taking a month’s shore leave at the priciest brothel in Marseilles are more fiscally conservative than Ted Kennedy. The bar is pretty low. [insert Ted Kennedy bar joke here]

Edward,

You’re certainly giving a lot of attention to talking down a candidate who you say has no chance of winning.

I certainly appreciate your constant reminders about Dr. Paul’s social conservatism. “OMG, he supports the Pledge of Allegiance! And God! And Mom! And apple pie!” As a Right-Wing Fundamentalist Chrisofascist (™), I find all this very reassuring.

But be assured that Dr. Paul’s Rainbow Coalition has room for everyone – Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Jains, atheists, agnostics, [insert name of unpopular sports team] fans, you name it.

“The best excuse most can come up with for a continued US presence is that we're already there; In other word, "Yeah, we were wrong, but now that we're there, we have to finish the job" (a rational that makes about as much sense as "mistaking" a stranger for your wife, but refusing to pull out 'til you're "finished")”

There’s a joke worth stealing. Thank you in advance.

Vote Quimby | December 4, 2007, 1:37am | #

8 Point Agenda by Latyrx. Plus it gives hip-hop fans a libertarian point of view. Try and listen to the song if possible to get the real effect. It's fan-freaking-tastic.

We believe in maximum effect

[And absolutely] every single facet of the gem

[Including] {but [not limited to the]

{Pursuit of truth [which has been] {unduly

[Smoothed over] {made soothing [to those]

Who have been doing the polluting in fact

{We wrote some raps

[Now I have here in my chest an outline]

{A list, [a platform], {manifesto, [a mandate

From intro] {to outro, it's absolutely rock solid

From the {bottom to the top and the [top to the bottom]

{Here's a outlook, and how it reads, [number one,]

{We don't believe in other people thieving the ideas

That our cerebrums cultivate and create, but if you're stealing them

[Now that's a calculated mistake]

{A combination infinite involving digitized code.. you can't break, point two:

[We believe in unconditional control

Not under supervision of another operator] {so

[What that means is our beliefs our boundaries shall all be balanced properly

Without restriction, limitation or revoke, Point three:]

{We don't believe in you controlling we [That's point three]

{I'm not obligated to listen to shit that you're telling me

That's the type of thing that could lead to a felony, I don't give a fuck

You yellin' at me at the top of your lungs, you do it

Otherwise it isn't gonna get done, I hold the reins to my tongue

{And decide when to close and open the door, the point four:

[Point four, you been warned, so before we move on

Just from point four on, just so you don't distort

The order make us go back and forth, once more

Let's repeat what we've recorded thus far, now point one:]

{We don't believe in other people thieving the ideas

That our cerebrums cultivate and create, make no mistake, point two:

[We believe in unconditional control of our beliefs and our opinions

Our souls, our growth, and our dominions, point three:]

{We don't believe in you controlling we

I'm not obligated to do or say or listen to a god damn thing, a point four

[Point four], {point four, [point four],

{point four, [point four], {point four, [now point four]:



We believe in all of the above just for the reasons given

Up, livin' it up, livin' not.. givin' up - setting

Government and loving it, so we self-sufficient

Not trippin' off of that subliminal stuff

We not submitting coming with it rough and tough

We gonna suppliment your knowledge with.. a substance

We not gonna let an opportunity get left out

We not.. gonna let some indecision stop what we about

We not.. gonna show no mercy over flowing the drought

Chad | December 4, 2007, 2:28am | #

Wow...what an intelligent and constructive conversation.

You should all (including the Paul supporters; and I support Dr. Paul) thinkg about growing up.

Eric D, as for attacking Richardson (who I would NEVER vote for by the way) for smoking ban, what about Czar Giuliani and his ARDENT and enthusiastic support of all things drug criminalization and his short-sighted view on the 2nd amendment as demonstrated in the CNN debate?

Take it easy everyone. Just try to cool it off on all sides and see if you can't get something out of the conversation other than self-gratitude. Or maybe that's what politics is all about. . .

Kolohe | December 4, 2007, 2:54am | #

A Marxist who studied in a Radical Islamic Madrassa as a little boy,

You giannormous hack, he went to elite private school in Hawaii from fifth to twelth grade; you know, when you actually learn shit. Are you goddamn worried he knows how to undermine America with fucking fingerpaintings and crappy macaroni dioramas?

penxv | December 4, 2007, 3:13am | #

"Let me propose another..

http://youtube.com/watch?v=01JQe00XHPI

A warning though...the song is in that meskin' language."

I liked it. This is good too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imqvH_0Yxs0

Franklin | December 4, 2007, 3:17am | #

Ali: word.

Pig Mannix: Paul gained points in the latest Iowa poll and the latest national poll (came out today I think). When the last NH and SC polls came out, he had gained in those states as well. I'm pretty sure the trend will continue, even if by only 2-4% at a time. Remember, those polls are "likely primary voters" (read: voted for Bush in 2004). Paul dominates the category of "unlikely primary voters" so if he can get 10-15% of the "likely" category in NH, he's going to upset. Ironically, this year Paul's "unlikely primary voters" are more likely to vote than the "likely primary voters".

Vote Quimby: Since everyone is sharing hip hop, don't forget Talib Kweli. His newest album is all over YouTube.

Chad: First time here? It actually seems fairly tame when compared to other threads.

-------------------------

Uh oh. This ad says don't vote for Ron Paul. (Found on LRC Blog)

Kolohe | December 4, 2007, 3:33am | #

sorry chad, didn't see your post.
i'm all settled down now.
(not sure about growing up; though i just had a winterboch, so that and the other holiday stuff is definitely starting to make the tummy grow out)

DDP | December 4, 2007, 7:23am | #

Deroy Murdock? Libertarian? Are you fucking joking?

"This is all the more reason for President Bush to reinstate waterboarding, proudly and publicly, so America can get the information we need to prevent Muslim-fanatic mass murder and win the Global War on Terror.

Appropriately enough, waterboarding is not used on American citizens suspected of tax evasion, sexual harassment, or bank robbery. Waterboarding is used on foreign Islamic-extremist terrorists, captured abroad, who would love nothing more than to blast innocent men, women, and children into small, bloody pieces. Some of them already have done so.

Waterboarding has worked quickly, causing at least one well-known subject to break down and identify at least six other high-profile, highly bloodthirsty associates before they could commit further mass murder beyond the 3,192 people they already killed and the 7,715 they already wounded.

Though clearly uncomfortable, waterboarding loosens lips without causing permanent physical injuries (and unlikely even temporary ones). If terrorists suffer long-term nightmares about waterboarding, better that than more Americans crying themselves to sleep after their loved ones have been shredded by bombs or baked in skyscrapers.

In short, there is nothing “repugnant” about waterboarding."

-Deroy Murdock

Any person within their wits that writes the above text is not, by the loosest definitions, a libertarian. Torture (or "enhanced interrogation", in Oceanic terms) violates one of the basic doctrines of libertarianism.

I know you want to stay safe little Dondero, and that you will sell your soul to the smallest man offering that safety. But please don't obfuscate our philosophy with your cowardice.

There is more to libertarianism than low taxes.

PS- "I'm now declaring for Giuliani, unless some more libertarian candidate like Dennis Miller, Ron Paul, Gary Johnson or Wayne Root jumps in the race." - Eric Dondero

So, Ron Paul is "more libertarian", by your own admission?

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 7:58am | #

DDP, a libertarian? Are you joking? He's even too much of a pussy to post comments under his own name. He has to use bullshit initials.

Get the fuck out of my libertarian movement you coward.

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:00am | #

DDP, ever serve in the Military fuckface?

We Military guys had to go through far worse in basic and other training than waterboarding. Try sitting in a gas chamber for 10 minutes, and being ordered to take off your gas mask the last 10 seconds, and count slowly to 10.

Good enough for our Military Personnel, abso-fucking-lutely good enough for terrorists.

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:02am | #

Yup, Ron Paul WAS more libertarian before May of last year. I was even moderately supportive of him.

Then he made the most idiotic statement of any Presidential candidate in the entire field, blaming the United States for the attacks of 9/11 at that debate with Giuliani.

Nothing less than conspiracy theory extremist leftist America-hating treasonous statement.

Anyone who blames America for the attacks of 9/11 and not the Terrorists and Islamo-Fascists DOE NOT DESERVE TO CALL ONESELF A LIBERTARIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They are rather a FASCIST!

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:07am | #

Edward, sorry you feel that way. I think endorsements in a Presidential race are extremely important.

Look, next to PJ O'Rourke, William Weld is one of the all-time heros to the libertarian Republican movement, and most specifically the Republican Liberty Caucus. I don't want to get into a long drawn-out RLC history here, but I'll just say that William Weld did some things in the early 1990s to endorse RLC's efforts, that put us on the map. I'm eternally grateful for that.

I'm not even sure that the term "libertarian Republican" would be half as popular as it is today, were it not for Weld. He was the VERY FIRST mainstream politician to get any play out of it whatsoever.

You cannot imagine how joyful us RLCers were in the early 1990s to pick up Time or Newsweek, or the Wall Street Journal, featuring an article on Weld, with the term "libertarian Republican" next to his name.

Thus, when William Weld endorses Mitt Romney for President, I listen. Not enough to swign me over from Rudy, but certainly enough to make me consider him as my second choice.

dpotts | December 4, 2007, 8:09am | #

Dondero, you twit... when you went through it you had the absolute certainty that the folks administering the water or the gas had your best interests in mind. That's why they were doing it. If you're really sitting here advocating torture, you absolutely have no comprehension of the legitimate use of force by the government, and YOU are the one that needs to "get the fuck out of my libertarian movement..."

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:11am | #

Great Franklin! Than we are agreed. You should stop calling yourself a "libertarian" and switch to something like leftist liberal, or "occasionally free market supporting hard leftist," or "anti-American, Islamo-Fascism loving, Paul-tard." Something along those lines would be appropriate for you, but not "libertarian."

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:14am | #

Yes, it is our foreign policy stupid. And even John Murtha the other day admitted that the Surge "has worked."

Just about every Dem out there, except for Kucinich is now admitting the same. Yet, Anti-War Libertarians are so saddled with their extremist position, that they're no escape for them. They're becomming the laughing stock of American politics, with their continual denunciation of our Troops, Patreus, and our Victory in Iraq.

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:19am | #

dpotts, what constitutes torture in your mind?

How about when the GIs surrounding Noriega's compoud in Panama City were blaring Heavy Metal music all day and all night long, to get Noriega to leave. Was that torture?

How about sleep deprival?

Or, maybe push-ups?

How about standing in place for an hour?

Walking a straight line, or being forced to touch your finger to your nose?

So, you think water-boarding IS torture, yet Gas Chambers ARE NOT?

When someone who was water-boarded is done they're just a little wet, and their hair is out of place.

A Military recruit in a gas chamber, leaves the chamber with snot streaming out of their nose, vomit coming out of their mouths, eye reddened and itchy and streaming of tears. Skin burning like a flame.

I remember it took about 45 minutes for us to recover. I saw some of the toughest mother-fuckers wimpering like little babies when they left that chamber. And every single one of us had to do it, including the Officers.

So don't cry to me about a little water sprinkled on someone's face.

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:23am | #

Chad, Giuliani on drugs?

Why not pose that question to former Maryland Governor, Republican Bob Ehrlich. He is a big supporter of Medical Marijuana reform, even backing such legislation in Annapolis. Most recently, he not only endorsed Giuliani, but is now State Chairman for his Maryland Campaign.

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:26am | #

Brandybuck, Mike Huckabee has some fanatical Christian supporters running ads now in Iowa, not approved by the Huckabee campaign.

This morning there's news that Huckabee has denounced them in the strongest terms possible, and has completely dissassociated himself from the ads and the group.

Wow! And these are just Christian Rightists. Imagine if some NeoNazi groups started running ads for Huckabee. He'd probably hunt them down, smack 'em down, and have them arrested.

Why won't Ron Paul do the same? Where's the outrage from Ron Paul to his NeoNazi supporters?

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:32am | #

AfricanAmericans4Paul,

(Yet another pussy boy who doesn't post under his own name? What the fuck is up with that? I mean Edward, Franklin, Bob and others here at least do that. Why such cowardice on this Forum?)

Anyway, guess you haven't been turning into the news as of late. The War in Iraq has been won, and it's a glorious victory, perhaps the greatest victory in the history of the United States.

Even Murtha, of all people, admitted the other day that "the Surge has worked."

What happened to all those "hundreds of thousands of body bags" that were going to be needed, according to the Leftists and the Anti-War Libertarians when we invaded Iraq?

Turns out it amounted to 3,800, less than the deaths of American soliders, sailors and Marines, in a single hour on the beaches of Normandy.

Keep to your line, that the War in Iraq is a "disaster." You'll become an even bigger clown than you are now, and will further discredit Anti-War Libertarianism. As a Pro-Defense libertarian, I'm hoping that you and others stick with that line.

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:35am | #

AfricanAmericans4Ron Paul (read, I'm too much of a pussy boy to post under my own name),

You say Ron Paul has a "wide coalition."

Really? He can't even get libertarians to back him.

There are libertarians supporting John McCain (Don Murphey of MD), there are libertarians supporting Romney (James Bonham and the guys at Race42008.com), many supporting Fred Thompson (Quentin Langley), even one or two behind Huckabee (Ted Nugent), and a host of libertarians supporting Rudy Giuliani.

If you can't even get libertarians behind you in a coalition, and you're identified as the "most libertarian candidate" in the GOP race, than you've got serious problems.

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 8:38am | #

Let me translate for you Bob.

Many people who support Ron Paul are NOT libertarians. Rather they're people like the NeoNazi StormTroopers, Don Black, David Duke, and Whacko David Macko. They're otherwise known as White Supremicists, Anti-Semites, or more derisively Jew Haters.

Huckabee has strongly denounced his errant Christian Right extremist supporters. Why can't Ron Paul do the same with his extremists?

Kaligula | December 4, 2007, 9:00am | #

KoЯn joins the rEVOLution

Edward | December 4, 2007, 9:34am | #

"But be assured that Dr. Paul’s Rainbow Coalition has room for everyone – Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Jains, atheists, agnostics, [insert name of unpopular sports team] fans, you name it" -- Mad Max

This is the sort of delusional bullshit that's typical of cults. It's as though desperate libertarians have been blinded by a school-girl crush on this wacko. Ron Paul is a garden-variety right-wing Christian who happens to oppose and unpopular war. Big fucking deal.

ed | December 4, 2007, 9:44am | #

Yes, yes, all the name-calling is witty and tedious...but back to reality for a moment (if indeed we were ever there): when does the pie-in-the-sky Paul campaign finally crash? After Iowa? New Hampshire? Guam? Any predictions? I like Paul, and I believe in voting one's principles, but come on. Better start bracing yourselves now for the inevitable letdown, don't you think?

Ali (aka iih) | December 4, 2007, 9:44am | #

Franklin-

Ali: word.

Huh?

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 9:58am | #

"Unpopular War" Edward?

Latest polls show that the American public is evenly divided, with a slight edge to the Pro-Defense side on whether we're winning.

An overwhelming majority now say the Surge has been a success.

This War is only unpopular on leftwing Blogs like Huffington Post, and Daily Kos, and on Rosie O'Donnel's The View.

In fact, it was never really that unpopular to begin with, even in the tough days about 10 months ago when casulaties were high.

Polling just asked "Do you oppose the War." They never asked "Why?" If they had they would have gotten the response from many like me, "I oppose the War cause Bush is being wimpy and isn't fighting it hard enough."

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 10:02am | #

Ed, I worked for Ron Paul for 12 long years. Let me give you a bit of advice. When it comes to Ron Paul, there's only one rule: Follow the Money!

He'll milk this thing for as long as he can. Long after Feb. 5, and long after Duncan Hunter, Tancredo, Fred Thompson and other also-rans have dropped out, Ron Paul will still be hanging in there.

His intention is to go to the Republican Convention in Minneapolis and seek a speaking slot in prime time.

He does the exact same thing here in Texas with the Texas GOP: He pressures them to give him speaking time.

This will get the Paul-bots opening their wallets for Paul even more.

After August, who knows? But from now until the Convention in August, Ron Paul will be hanging around duping campaign contributors, and getting interviews on leftwing radio and TV shows bashing the Republicans.

In other words, he'll be a royal pain in the ass for another 8 months or so.

Edward | December 4, 2007, 10:20am | #

But Eric, the war is unpopular--and not just among left-wingers--not because Bush isn't fighting it hard enough, but because he lied to us going into it. Saddam had no connection to 9/11. Ron Paul is right about that. Libertarians and some on the left are so anxous to have an anti-war candidate that they're willing to overlook Ron Paul's extremist religious positions (The founding fathers envisioned a robust Christian nation) and Tancredo-like demonization of immigrants--the very things the Nazis like about him. He's a nutjob, and his libertarian supporters are either delusional or stupid.

fish | December 4, 2007, 10:20am | #

Polling just asked "Do you oppose the War." They never asked "Why?" If they had they would have gotten the response from many like me, "I oppose the War cause Bush is being wimpy and isn't fighting it hard enough."

This sounds like a job for Dondero! Hey you fat tub of guts there's nothing stopping you from reenlisting and really taking it to the swarthy hordes!

C'mon who's with me........AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! (He run,s Belushi like from Omega House)

Edward | December 4, 2007, 10:21am | #

Oh, and he can't win diddlysquat.

Eric Dondero | December 4, 2007, 10:28a