Snooze and You Lose
Juliet Samuel | July 11, 2007, 5:03pm
John Kass in the
Chicago Tribune brings us the story of Sam Hardison, the window cleaner charged with "sleeping dangerously" on the Chicago subway:
"I looked the officer right in the eye and said, 'You've got to be kidding. I have to go to court on this?' And he said, 'Yes, you do,'" Hardison, a West Sider, told us the other day about his June 5 ticket on the Red Line....
"And the other officer said, 'If you don't be quiet, we will take you to jail right now. We'll arrest you,'" Hardison said. "I let them write their citations. I felt that it was not right, but what can I do?"
Apparently City Hall is hard up and looking to extract cash from innocent bystanders. Fines are a good way to do it because, as Kass says, most people who receive a fine just grumble and pay it. Not Hardison, who instead went to a hearing to dispute the charge.
The City dropped the case today, but Hardison complains that he lost a day's wages to attend the hearing. And his friends have another theory as to why he, of all the other comatose subway riders, was picked up:
"Absolutely, absolutely, if you look at him, you might think he was homeless, a black guy with a pretty scraggily beard," Dahl said. "If it was me, a short Jewish guy, sleeping on the train, they are not going to write me a ticket."
Which would suggest that either City Hall is demanding money from homeless people or it's spending money to kick them off the subway.
TrappedEastOfTheBigMuddy | July 12, 2007, 2:27am | #
I don't know what is more disturbing... that a bunch of people thought the guy must be a "homeless kidnapper" because he had a beard... Or that not one of these "concerned citizens" who were convinced they were witnessing a kidnapping bothered to help the kid.
Since I suspect that this is simply a manifestation of the current
Reign of Fear and Paranoia gripping the good ole US of A, I'll go with the former.
Here is how I see it happening:
They saw something that wasn't
exactly what they were used to and expecting. So it was suspicious and their duty was to
do something. Then they start thinking...
Going to help the kid means a confrontation, which they don't want and aren't any good at. And besides that nice Officer Bob who came to the school assembly told us to leave the law enforcement to the professionals.
In anycase, what would they do to help the kid?
Approach them? "Excuse me sir, could I have a word with the young lady? You see, I'm worried that you might be kidnapping her." Probably won't get them hurt, but it is not going to go well.
Follow them around waiting to see something actionable? Waste of time, and besides, he might call the cops on them.
Just tackle the guy? That's dangerous if he is a baddie, and
worse if he isn't.
But they simply must
do something.
So they call the cops.
Nothing new here, it's just that we are living in the Crazy Years.