If You're Reading This, You're (Probably) a Terrorist

Nick Sibilla | February 8, 2012

You're in the latest hot spot in the war on terror. computer terrorism

A new report from the UK Home Affairs Committee claims the Internet is the "main forum for radicalisation" for terrorists and right-wing extremists. Even more than prisons, universities, and places of worship, "the internet does seem to feature in most, if not all, of the routes of radicalisation." The Home Office describes how people are radicalized by this series of tubes:

The internet "plays a role in terms of sustaining and reinforcing terrorist ideological messages and enabling individuals to find and communicate with like-minded individuals and groups."

Of course, that's true with any political or religious viewpoint. Just replace the word "terrorist" with conservative/libertarian/progressive/evangelical/atheist, etc. and you've basically described the entire Internet and its appeal. Congrats.

Loz Kaye, leader of the UK Pirate Party, tweeted his disappointment with the Committee's report:

Violence is born of too little information, not too much. We need a free functioning Internet if the aim is to engage.

But the fact that the Internet facilitates freedom of expression is troublesome for statists. The Home Affairs study also reports that the Internet is "now one of the few unregulated spaces where radicalisation is able to take place." Ergo, regulation. Right on cue, Keith Vaz, the chairman of the committee (who has a long history of censorship), argues:

More resources need to be directed to these threats and to preventing radicalisation through the internet and in private spaces. These are the fertile breeding grounds for terrorism.

Because of this, the Home Affairs Committee wants Internet service providers (ISPs) to actively monitor and remove "extremist" content and websites, even without a court order. Jim Killock, executive director of the Open Rights Group, argues that content take-downs would be very ineffective, and, of course, Orwellian:

Very little can be done to take down websites that are extreme: because they are rarely hosted in the UK...The alternative to takedown is censorship, which is both ineffective and hands a propaganda victory to the targets of that censorship.

Obviously, defining terrorism and extremism can tricky. One darkly comic example was when the London police labeled the Occupy movement as terrorists and extremists, on par with al-Qaeda and FARC.

But the invocation of terrorism and right-wing extremism is really just the pretense for greater control of the Internet. Indeed, that very same Home Affairs report also notes:

Most radicalisation does not take place in fora at all; it takes place in private premises.

Not to mention that its findings:

...seemed to be contradicted by more recent Home Office-commissioned research, which concluded that the internet "does not appear to play a significant role in Al Qa'ida-influenced radicalisation." Even those witnesses who attributed a significant role to the internet tended to support that report's conclusion that some element of face-to-face contact was generally essential to radicalisation taking place, including with regards to the extreme far right...

Since al-Qaeda has been rendered "operationally ineffective," new scares are needed. Hence, the renewed focus on the far right and even links to "criminal gangs."

Reason on the Internet, terrorism, and censorship. Back in December 2011, Glenn Greenwald detailed a similar attempt by the Obama administration to control the Internet to eradicate the scourge of "Twitter terrorism."

Reason needs your support. Please donate today!

Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.

Brandon|2.8.12 @ 4:53PM|#

Good thing libertarians are moderate, unlike those extremist Ancaps.

Killazontherun|2.8.12 @ 5:32PM|#

When they first came for the Occupiers, I did not listen because those fuckers are idiots.
When they next came for the Ancaps, they get their asses handed to them, and they never get the chance to go after the Libertarians.
Did the Minarchist bother to thank us? No.

Killazontherun|2.8.12 @ 5:40PM|#

I can't even make my self sing 'I Fought the Law' with the original lyrics. I tried, and I can't do it. It's more repulsive than drinking a glass of donkey semen.

AlmightyJB|2.8.12 @ 7:25PM|#

If you say so.

Fist of Etiquette|2.8.12 @ 4:53PM|#

The alternative to takedown is censorship, which is both ineffective and hands a propaganda victory to the targets of that censorship.

There's also a third thing you could say about censorship.

RoboCain|2.8.12 @ 4:55PM|#

It sucks ass?

Keith Vaz|2.8.12 @ 9:40PM|#

No, you can't.

o3|2.8.12 @ 4:55PM|#

"...terrorists and *OTHER* right-wing extremists."
_
nick was being redundant.

that is all.

Earth Liberation Front|2.8.12 @ 6:02PM|#

Your check is in the mail, o3.

PR|2.8.12 @ 4:56PM|#

you know who wasn't on the internet?

Ice Nine|2.8.12 @ 4:59PM|#

Carlos the Jackal?

Konfounded Kristen|2.8.12 @ 8:38PM|#

A True Lies reference? Golf clap to you, sir.

Rich|2.8.12 @ 5:28PM|#

Ted Stevens?

Godwell|2.8.12 @ 8:12PM|#

Hitler?

|2.8.12 @ 5:00PM|#

Maybe by giving people a place to blow off steam and air their grievances, we get less terrorism?

We will never know how many people didn't become terrorists because after reading the radical sites decided that perhaps blowing themselves up wasn't for them.

Joe M|2.8.12 @ 5:02PM|#

You want clean energy? Just hook a turbine up to Orwell spinning in his grave.

|2.8.12 @ 5:27PM|#

read his collection of essays "Why i write"

Orwell was a fascist.

AlmightyJB|2.8.12 @ 5:04PM|#

Just replace the word "terrorist" with conservative/libertarian/~~progressive~~/evangelical/~~atheist~~/, etc. and to the media you've basically described the ~~entire Internet and its appeal~~ same thing as a terrorist.

|2.8.12 @ 5:05PM|#

are there no left wing extremists? or are they just not worth worrying about?

|2.8.12 @ 5:06PM|#

They run the government now. You know one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

AlmightyJB|2.8.12 @ 5:26PM|#

Exactly. There is no such thing as too far to the left to them.

Earth Liberation Front|2.8.12 @ 6:03PM|#

Don't make us torch your Hummer!

|2.8.12 @ 5:26PM|#

I thought the internet enabled the Arab spring and Obama to get elected and unicorn puppies.

AlmightyJB|2.8.12 @ 5:28PM|#

Yeah, you think you would like unicorn puppies until they stick their nose in your crotch.

PETA|2.8.12 @ 5:29PM|#

Don't be threatening unicorn puppies!

left-wing totalitarians|2.8.12 @ 8:31PM|#

I thought We told ya to quit breathin' our air.

You're breathin' our air. You must be terrorists.

Michael S. Langston|2.8.12 @ 9:13PM|#

So I've got this going g for me, huh?

rather|2.8.12 @ 9:27PM|#

Obviously, defining terrorism and extremism can tricky
Facebook knows how to determine terrorizing tits

imhotep|2.8.12 @ 9:32PM|#

Can the government stay solvent longer than we can stay free? I say no. Fuck the government. I hope thay all go to hell. Also fuck tha police.

cynical|2.8.12 @ 9:48PM|#

I suppose a guy who leads a march of Muslims demanding the banning of the Satanic Verses probably knows more about terrorism and extremism than you or I.

Hmmm... Supports banning of The Satanic Verses. Supports banning of violent video games. Supports censorship of the Internet. I'm sensing a pattern here with Mr. Vaz.

What a fucking asshole.

Barack the Jaunty Future King|2.8.12 @ 10:39PM|#

I've already summoned Vaz to My Office. We're gonna have a beer summit!

Ghost |2.9.12 @ 10:30AM|#

The far right, it's always the far right isn't it? You know those good chaps on the far left killed a few million (or a hundred million people) last century.

Reason.com