January 13, 2010
Scott Roeder, whose trial
begins this week in Wichita, Kansas, wanted to argue that killing
the abortion doctor George Tiller was necessary to prevent a
greater evil: the murder of unborn children. Since that is not how
the law views what Tiller did for a living, it is not surprising
that the judge would not let Roeder present a “necessity” defense.
But Senior Editor Jacob Sullum says it is surprising that
so many people who proclaim that fetuses have a right to life
reject Roeder’s argument out of hand.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245