Watch below, or follow the link, which divvies up the hour-long chat into digestible segments and offers a lively comments section.
December 7, 2009
Watch below, or follow the link, which divvies up the hour-long chat into digestible segments and offers a lively comments section.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
|12.7.09 @ 8:50AM|#
I can't sit through this. Did the leftie actually criticize Hopey McChange, or did he meet my expectations?
-jcr
Matt Welch|12.7.09 @ 9:15AM|#
Yes, there was criticism....
|12.7.09 @ 9:23AM|#
So, he's not a total hypocrite like Obama is? Good for him. He's boring as hell, though.
-jcr
|12.7.09 @ 9:51AM|#
Afghanistan is a JOKE. The US has no business there and has enough of its own problems to deal with!
RT
www.be-anonymous.bg.tc
|12.7.09 @ 3:06PM|#
In the central-planning fantasy of American lefties like Christopher Hayes, it's always assumed THEY themselves would have a role on the People's Planning Committee, financed by a nice, fat government stipend.
It never occurs to them their own personal freedom and livelihood would ever be at stake; only someone else's.
Sadly, history disagrees..."intellectuals" were usually the first to be shot.
Paul|12.9.09 @ 2:31AM|#
Was Hayes being agreeable because you guys are old friends? Interesting discussion, but I didn't see much debate here. I didn't detect any rah-rah Obama on his part.