New at Reason: Read Our Complete November Issue

November 3, 2009

Our entire November issue is now available online. Don't miss Matt Welch on the defeat of Communism, Brian Doherty on the movement to curtail the Federal Reserve, Greg Beato on surviving without newspapers, plus our Artifact, the complete Citings and Briefly Noted sections, and much more.

Click here to read our complete November issue.

Comments

John Tagliaferro|11.3.09 @ 8:31AM|#

You guys really are trying to get shut down by the new administration. Impressive!

Xeones|11.3.09 @ 8:34AM|#

It's ok, John. Reason is "not a real news source."

John Tagliaferro|11.3.09 @ 8:38AM|#

The FOX of pulp?

Your Unbiased Administration|11.3.09 @ 9:04AM|#

Brown: Do you think Fox News is biased?

Jarrett: Of course they’re biased. (laughs)

Brown: Well, do you also think MSNBC is biased?

Jarrett: Well, you know what? This is…this is the thing. I don’t want to generalize and say Fox is biased or another station is biased. I think what we want to do is to look at it on a case-by-case basis. And when we see a pattern of distorition, were going to be honest about that pattern of distortion.

Brown: But you only see that at Fox News. That’s all that you’ve spoken out about.

Jarrett: That’s actually not true.

Xeones|11.3.09 @ 10:51AM|#

The FOX of pulp?

The FOX of potheads?

MANIAC|11.3.09 @ 11:09AM|#

I saw a pothead the other day who was quite the fox.

Isaac Bartram|11.3.09 @ 1:39PM|#

Ah, the memories...

30 Years Ago in reason
From the November 2009 issue

“With the unwitting cooperation of shallow news reporting, Chrysler is fostering the impression that bankruptcy means disappearance—as if the company’s physical assets were literally going to be liquidated, never to be seen again.”

—Robert W. Poole Jr., “Rescue Chrysler?”

From here.

John Tagliaferro|11.3.09 @ 2:32PM|#

They had not yet invented vaporization in 1979? Guess I was reading too much SciFi then.

Isaac Bartram|11.3.09 @ 3:05PM|#

Sitting here today recalling the "bailout to end all bailouts" one just gets deja vu all over again.