October 28, 2009
In his new book The Will of the
People, NYU law professor Barry Friedman argues that the
Supreme Court never gets too far ahead of (or behind) public
opinion, even when it comes to its most controversial decisions.
But as Associate Editor Damon W. Root writes, the whole point of
having a written constitution is to offer a permanent check
against the shifting desires of the majority. So if it’s indeed
true that the Court eventually just gives way to public opinion,
how much independent meaning does the Constitution actually
retain?
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245