October 1, 2009
It has been only a year and a season
since the Supreme Court shook the world of Second Amendment
jurisprudence with the historic
D.C. v. Heller decision. In that case, the Court
declared for the first time that against the federal government,
the Second Amendment does protect an individual right to bear
arms.
Now the Court has taken up the case of McDonald v. Chicago, which will settle whether the Second Amendment applies to states and localities as well. And as Senior Editor Brian Doherty writes, Heller lawyer Alan Gura is now arguing McDonald, and in doing so he's attempting to revive the 14th Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause. If he succeeds, Doherty explains, it will create a powerful new weapon for vindicating all sorts of rights, not just the Second Amendment.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245