Beginning in
the late 1980s, the U.S. saw a surge in the number of people
prosecuted for shaking infants to death. Research at the time
suggested that the presence of three particular symptoms could only
mean a child had been vigorously shaken to death, and the that the
assault took place just before the infant lost consciousness.
But as Senior Editor Radley Balko explains, in the early 2000s, the medical consensus on shaken baby syndrome began to shift. In the meantime, thousands of people have been convicted based on science that most researchers now believe was misleading or incorrect. Balko argues that the shaken baby cases show how a criminal justice system that puts a high value on finality is slow to recognize advances in science and medical research.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.