September 14, 2009
When Vermont
computer consultant Kevin Kadamus mistakenly shot and killed his
son on a hunting trip last May, a rift opened up between the local
community—who generally supported Kadamus—and police and
prosecutors, who wanted to charge him with a felony. As Senior
Editor Radley Balko explains, the case reveals how public choice
theory plays an increasingly influential role in how prosecutors do
their jobs. While not bringing charges in a high-profile
case might be the right decision, it doesn't allow prosecutors to
wield the powers or enjoy the benefits of public office.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.