September 9, 2009
When Siobhan
Reynolds thinks a doctor has been unfairly targeted
for prosecution based on his narcotic prescriptions, she tries
to counter the official narrative by highlighting the patients he
has helped and dramatizing the conflict between drug control and
pain control. By portraying Reynolds' advocacy as obstruction of
justice, Senior Editor Jacob Sullum argues, a
federal prosecutor threatens the freedom of anyone who dares
to suggest there is more than one side to a criminal case.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.