This
fall, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Alvarez v.
Smith, a challenge to Illinois' particularly brutal asset
forfeiture law. The law allows the police to keep property seized
in warrantless searches for up to six months before giving even a
preliminary hearing, even if no criminal charges are filed. As
Senior Editor Radley Balko explains, even if the Supreme Court
rules correctly on the time issue, other, equally nasty portions of
the law are likely to remain intact.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.