Reason Magazine

Print|Email

New at Reason: Radley Balko on the Supreme Court Forfeiture Case Alvarez v. Smith

This fall, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Alvarez v. Smith, a challenge to Illinois' particularly brutal asset forfeiture law. The law allows the police to keep property seized in warrantless searches for up to six months before giving even a preliminary hearing, even if no criminal charges are filed. As Senior Editor Radley Balko explains, even if the Supreme Court rules correctly on the time issue, other, equally nasty portions of the law are likely to remain intact.

Read all about it here.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.

Leave a Comment

advertisements

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:


(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245