July 8, 2009
Republicans and Democrats alike
have been calling for South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford's
resignation since he admitted to an affair last month. Writing in
the Columbia, South Carolina-based newspaper The State,
Amanda Carey argues that forcing Sanford to resign is neither
necessary or best for the state of South Carolina.
Read the whole thing here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I gotta love seeing a reason staffer is getting
published in a newspaper known colloquially as La
Socialista.
Progress!
I don't think he should resign, but he has made himself look a little wacky and not a little dishonest. Which likely kills his national office hopes.
The fact that Mark Sanford had an affair bothers me not one
whit.
But if I were a South Carolinian the question of whether he had the
state pay some of his personal travel expenses would.
I sometimes find it strange what will destroy a pols career.
If he has to resign, should not every politicion who cheated on his wife also resign?
The fact that Mark Sanford had an affair bothers me not one
whit.
But if I were a South Carolinian the question of whether he had the
state pay some of his personal travel expenses
would.
Same here...
I don't care who he's fucking, but the fact that he pushed to add
destinations to taxpayer funded trips in order to be with his lover
is why he should resign.
The violation of the public trust and treating public monies as if
it were his own is why he should resign, not the infidelity.
She keeps talking of "forcing" Sanford's resignation, without
specifying how he would be forced. I can see arguing that he should
resign, I can see arguing that he shouldn't, but ultimately it is
his decision and how one feels about whether he should or shouldn't
will affect how one feels about him. It seems she is using the
"force" term to imply some sort of coercion that I am not
grasping.
Here in Portland, OR, there is an effort underway to force a recall
of our Mayor, who lied about an affair he had with a young state
capitol intern prior to his election. Personally, I'd have been
happy if Mayor Adams had resigned, but he didn't. At the same time,
I don't support and won't vote for recall, which seems an
extraordinary step for what amounts to bad judgement. In other
words, IMO voluntary resignation - good; forced removal/resignation
- bad. I think Ms. Carey is being disingenuous in trying to blur
the distinction.
I don't care who he's fucking, but the fact that he pushed
to add destinations to taxpayer funded trips in order to be with
his lover is why he should resign.
As my old boss used to say "travel is a perk".
I've got to say on general principles, I'm in favor of governors
having all kinds of scandals to distract them. I wish Arnold would
get caught banging an intern or something.
-jcr
If I lived in his State, I wouldn't necessarily want him to resign. All I would ask is that he reimburse the State for all of his Argentinian mistress-related expenses, and that henceforth he get paid the minimum wage,and then only for hours actually worked.
I wouldn't want him to resign for political reasons. But morally, I'd really only believe he was sorry if he took himself out of the situation which gave him the power, influence, and taxpayer money to do this. I'll take his tearful apology as crocodile tears for being caught until he does so. (Not that this is a good political reason for him to resign, unless he wants to look sorry to the more discerning of the populace).
"If he has to resign, should not every politicion who cheated on
his wife also resign?"
Not a bad idea. That would mean every legislator loses their job
tomorrow. And then we would have no congress.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245