Ronald Bailey | May 28, 2009
From a front page article
in the New York Times yesterday reporting the imminent
Federal government takeover (70 percent ownership) of General
Motors:
There are cultural challenges, too. Can the government help turn around a company known for its bureaucratic approach to business?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
==== InterracialChats.Com ==== The wonderful place where you can mingle with hot singles who are looking to date outside their race. Find your partner here whether they reside within your own neighborhood or abroad.
"Can the government help turn around a company known for its
bureaucratic approach to business?"
When the right people are in charge of the machine, it'll run
correctly.
not nearly as ironic as a black fly in your chardonnay, dontcha think?
Can the government help turn around a company known for its
bureaucratic approach to business?
Who better to root out waste, fraud, and abuse?
GM is screwed. What moron would buy a car from Government
Motors?
There are only so many NYT reporters in the world.
Can the government help turn around a company known for its
bureaucratic approach to business?
To ask the question is to answer it.
Aright then, Xeones. I'll do it myself.
Yo, fuck the New York Times.
When the Treasury Dept accountants get done cooking
cleaning up the books, GM will be profitable from day
one.
The feds running GM will redefine the term Chinese fuck story.
If it were not such a waste of taxpayer money and an affront to
those like me who think that failure should go unrewarded it would
be funny as hell to watch.
The almost schizophrenic conflicting goals of the
Obama administration vis a vis the big three almost guarantee a
terabuck of wasted taxpayer money by fools too stubborn to face
reality.
Spelling Nazi: Thanks. Fixed. And yes. But even that doesn't explain how that pesky 's got in there.
Warty-
I see that you are giving the Times the Lonewacko treatment. As you
probably know, IMO, such treatment is far more justified when
directed at the former-hey, the New York Times pisses me off far
more than 24DotCom.
Forty-Two, the Alanis Morissette references are NOT HELPING. Let the hurting stop and the healing begin.
libertymike, I figured that if Xeones was going to drop the ball, I might as well give my catchphrase some work.
As a gubermint employee, I can see the gov putting all their
resources into electric cars...and suceeding!!! When the President
orders a solution, the employees solute!!!
Department of Transportation announces electric car
breakthrough!!!
"With out of the box thinking, we discovered that the solution was
relatively simple...long, long, long, ...extension cords."
GM is screwed. What moron would buy a car from Government
Motors?
There are only so many NYT reporters in the world.
Nah, they still buy Volvos and Prius's.
Sug, if you venture away from the many SF hotties- into, say, the pop music industry- you enter dangerous territory indeed. Not sure why the NYT feels the need to do further damage to the word "ironic." Alanis beat them to it.
"Can the government help turn around a company known for its
bureaucratic approach to business?"
Can a crackhead help me quit smoking?
What moron would buy a car from Government
Motors?
Liberals will always need limousines.
There was a news analysis earlier on CNN I think that said GM
was going to kill at least 4 high performance cars (including the
new Camaro) to meet the new CAFE standards.
It will be interesting to watch a governemnt-influenced (if not
-run) GM run into the brick wall of the new government-imposed CAFE
standards.
Xeones-
"A dude needs a break sometimes." I imagine the junior senator from
Illinois must feel the same way.
I imagine the junior senator from Illinois must feel the
same way.
Probably, Michael. But he's just the president -- i CREATED A
MEME.
It will be interesting to watch a governemnt-influenced (if
not -run) GM run into the brick wall of the new government-imposed
CAFE standards.
It will be Teh Market's fault. Teh Market is the end result of the
decisions of the cattle. If the cattle don't behave as expected,
then any resulting problems are their (and thus the market's)
fault. If they did as they were told, all would be golden.
From the article, "Aides to President Obama have consistently said they would be reluctant shareholders, and they plan no operating role in the company." ... and that the UAW would retain 20%. So, who, exactly, IS going to run it? The remaining 10%? I leave this question for others.
"""Liberals will always need limousines."""
Are you calling Limbaugh and O'Reilly liberals?
I think Government Motors should come to an end by the people not
buying another out of protest. Like that will ever happen.
I think Government Motors should come to an end by the
people not buying another out of protest. Like that will ever
happen.
I won't buy a car from GM or Chrysler. Encourage everyone you know
to also avoid them and mock any who don't.
Department of Transportation announces electric car
breakthrough!!!
"With out of the box thinking, we discovered that the solution was
relatively simple...long, long, long, ...extension
cords."
Reminds me of an old joke:
Trabant brought out a new eco-car: Immediately available for
delivery, cheap, quiet, environmentally friendly - with electric
power train. The only problem was, the extension cord was only 20
meters long and not in stock.
After all these years, what's good for General Motors truly is
good for the United States, and vice versa, because General Motors
IS the United States -- an arm of its federal government, at
least.
Coming soon, the Chevrolet Federale, and the resuscitated
Oldsmobile's Amero (our answer to the Yugo!). For survivalists and
suburbanites, no more Hummer. It's now the friendlier, smaller,
more fuel-efficient Humor! ("Cause when the sky is falling, ya
gotta laugh!")
Help me, Mr. Wizard!
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245