The cap-and-trade carbon rationing
proposal just introduced in Congress aims to address the problem of
man-made global warming. Proponents claim that it will also "create
jobs by spurring investment in renewables and efficiency." Not so,
says Science Correspondent Ronald Bailey. The cap-and-trade scheme
functions like a tax, which even the head of President Obama's
Council of Economic Advisors says will reduce economc growth. And
reduced economic growth means fewer jobs, not more.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.