May 11, 2009
The logic of
the Matthew Shepard Act is hard to follow. According to sponsoring
Sen. Ted Kennedy, "No members of society—none—deserve to be victims
of a violent crime because of their race, their religion, their
ethnic background, their disability, their gender, their gender
identity, or their sexual orientation." But as Steve Chapman
writes, who exactly does deserve to be the victim of a
violent crime? Moreover, Chapman continues, the bill targets
actions we would all like to eliminate—physically injuring or
trying to injure someone with "fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon,
or an explosive or incendiary device." But it's hard to imagine
that it would reduce the prevalence of such conduct, which is
already 1) really, really illegal and 2) subject to harsh
penalties.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245