The logic of
the Matthew Shepard Act is hard to follow. According to sponsoring
Sen. Ted Kennedy, "No members of society—none—deserve to be victims
of a violent crime because of their race, their religion, their
ethnic background, their disability, their gender, their gender
identity, or their sexual orientation." But as Steve Chapman
writes, who exactly does deserve to be the victim of a
violent crime? Moreover, Chapman continues, the bill targets
actions we would all like to eliminate—physically injuring or
trying to injure someone with "fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon,
or an explosive or incendiary device." But it's hard to imagine
that it would reduce the prevalence of such conduct, which is
already 1) really, really illegal and 2) subject to harsh
penalties.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.